That will get thrown out ?

Has to be thrown out cannot be much clearer than that shirley.
In saying that Paddy Brennan has made a **** of it

layout of track at fault and won by far enough. will keep it id think..

this is the last thing fence sitter Enzo needs....extremely dangerous tbf...no odds in any other jurisdiction, UK who knows

Keeps it

why would paddy decide to go up through that side with the rail to come? error.

our rules are a farce and will allow it to keep it

Massive price to keep it, never seen one that won by that far thrown out.

"won by far enough"?

Only won that far because it put the other over the rail

I think he will keep it, and I've had a little bet on it

spot on Biscar...

I've seen it four times now, Tuscan Gold keeps the race for me.

Watching live I thought Paddy would switch to the stands side once the leader jumped across him at the last.

Really I suppeose the winner should go, but there's a part of me that thinks Paddy got what he deserved.

the winner keeps it. the jock on the second misjudged the rail which sticks out a bit...that's my interpretation...and I have no financial interest.

the winner keeps it. the jock on the second misjudged the rail which sticks out a bit...that's my interpretation...and I have no financial interest.

no play for me.....

Runner up never in front, went for a gap that wasn't there primarily because of the rails cutting in, no way to me should the winner be thrown out.

No guarantee the second would have gone past imo, has a history of weak finishing.

Brennan should get a ban for that.

if the winner keeps it then our rules are bollocks...unfortunately I think the stewards will bottle it yet again...the 2nd horse was trading 1.14 when it was virtually knocked over the rail...will cost me if the winner keeps it.

I am on winner
..brown underpants time
any betting anywhere?

errrrr, on here??

slight conflict of interest larnplay

1.59
2.66

Horses get dq'ed for intimidation imho

in reality 2nd went for a gap that was not there

if you are on pre race gery, then surely take advantage of getting out at around 1.6..no brainer tbf..

RESULT STANDS WD

can't actually see where the winner has moved off a straight line...surely, result stands, here!

http://www.britishhorseracing.com/resources/disciplinary/GuidetoPenalties2012.pdf

all there decide for yourself

The interference was that severe the distance is irrelevant. it  was very likely the second would have won and on this occasion imo he will get the race which even given the current rules would be correct.

went for a gap that was not there-surely rider of 2nd gets a ban

Any time this month would be lovely.

"Generally speaking, the longer the Panel discusses
whether the placings should be altered, the less likely it is that they should be. If
the Panel is unable to conclude one way or the other, the result should stand"

What a rule that is!!!

stands............our rules are patethic

RESULT STANDS

Easy peasy

And NOW WE KNOW knows feck all

If u don't get thrown out for that stewards are a waste of time

Cannot believe that written into the rules is the fact that the longer the panel debate the less likely they should be to change the result

Oh yes.. pay me the money

thank you layers

The IR market tells the story but the stewards would not be looking at that. Very hard to say the second would not have won and I still say that is the wrong decision.

complete waste of time i.m.o

the stewards uphold the rules...the rules are wrong...that leaves a lot of disgruntled punters.

you are probably right now we know...did not look good
but times are hard...a winner is a winner...so apologies
Skinto has been letting me down lately
...I am having to pick my own

u/l 2nd backers

ta sheikh you was right..covered me stake
wd george

the rules are becoming ludicrous. The stewards banned the jockey on the winner for going left when he was not far enough in front - in other words he was less than a length in front when he veered left. He nearly puts the 2nd over the rails 50 yards out and wins 3 lengths. The inning distance should have absolutely no bearing on the result of the inquiry in this case imo as the 2nd had no chance to get running again.
Benefit of the doubt should have been with the 2nd imo.