There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
30 Apr 13
19:51
Joined:
Date Joined:
03 Sep 08
Dangerous
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 48
|
By:
Has to be thrown out cannot be much clearer than that shirley.
In saying that Paddy Brennan has made a **** of it |
|
By:
layout of track at fault and won by far enough. will keep it id think..
|
|
By:
this is the last thing fence sitter Enzo needs....extremely dangerous tbf...no odds in any other jurisdiction, UK who knows
|
|
By:
Keeps it
|
|
By:
why would paddy decide to go up through that side with the rail to come? error.
|
|
By:
our rules are a farce and will allow it to keep it
|
|
By:
Massive price to keep it, never seen one that won by that far thrown out.
|
|
By:
"won by far enough"?
Only won that far because it put the other over the rail |
|
By:
I think he will keep it, and I've had a little bet on it
 |
|
By:
spot on Biscar...
|
|
By:
I've seen it four times now, Tuscan Gold keeps the race for me.
|
|
By:
Watching live I thought Paddy would switch to the stands side once the leader jumped across him at the last.
Really I suppeose the winner should go, but there's a part of me that thinks Paddy got what he deserved. |
|
By:
the winner keeps it. the jock on the second misjudged the rail which sticks out a bit...that's my interpretation...and I have no financial interest.
|
|
By:
the winner keeps it. the jock on the second misjudged the rail which sticks out a bit...that's my interpretation...and I have no financial interest.
|
|
By:
no play for me.....
|
|
By:
Runner up never in front, went for a gap that wasn't there primarily because of the rails cutting in, no way to me should the winner be thrown out.
|
|
By:
No guarantee the second would have gone past imo, has a history of weak finishing.
|
|
By:
Brennan should get a ban for that.
|
|
By:
if the winner keeps it then our rules are bollocks...unfortunately I think the stewards will bottle it yet again...the 2nd horse was trading 1.14 when it was virtually knocked over the rail...will cost me if the winner keeps it.
|
|
By:
I am on winner
..brown underpants time  any betting anywhere? |
|
By:
errrrr, on here??
|
|
By:
slight conflict of interest larnplay
|
|
By:
1.59
2.66 |
|
By:
Horses get dq'ed for intimidation imho
|
|
By:
in reality 2nd went for a gap that was not there
|
|
By:
if you are on pre race gery, then surely take advantage of getting out at around 1.6..no brainer tbf..
|
|
By:
RESULT STANDS WD
|
|
By:
can't actually see where the winner has moved off a straight line...surely, result stands, here!
|
|
By:
http://www.britishhorseracing.com/resources/disciplinary/GuidetoPenalties2012.pdf
all there decide for yourself |
|
By:
The interference was that severe the distance is irrelevant. it was very likely the second would have won and on this occasion imo he will get the race which even given the current rules would be correct.
|
|
By:
went for a gap that was not there-surely rider of 2nd gets a ban
|
|
By:
Any time this month would be lovely.
 |
|
By:
"Generally speaking, the longer the Panel discusses
whether the placings should be altered, the less likely it is that they should be. If the Panel is unable to conclude one way or the other, the result should stand" What a rule that is!!! |
|
By:
stands............our rules are patethic
|
|
By:
RESULT STANDS
|
|
By:
Easy peasy
|
|
By:
And NOW WE KNOW knows feck all
|
|
By:
If u don't get thrown out for that stewards are a waste of time
|
|
By:
Cannot believe that written into the rules is the fact that the longer the panel debate the less likely they should be to change the result
|