There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 95 comments are related to the topic:
c4 coverage shocking
c4 coverage shocking
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 95
|
By:
agree johonny it did seem very flat didnt it, and they tried to make it exciting but it came over as false , it was poor
|
|
By:
Too many aerial shots for my liking.
|
|
By:
and people thought that jonny francombe-big mac-tommo-fat al-were past there sell by dates ? jesus wish they would all come back
|
|
By:
take one out postmannick please
|
|
By:
Come on, name and shame who said "betting suggests its a two horse race "
|
|
By:
tanya
9-2 joint  |
|
By:
Terrible coverage.Just been on a lesbian sports website and even they were turned off....
|
|
By:
balding's chin enough to turn you off women-probably even turn women off women
|
|
By:
Cheers, couldnt hear a thing round here with half the family turning up about an hour before the race
|
|
By:
thought camera work was awful
|
|
By:
Camera angles and re=run of the race were terrible. Much too learn
|
|
By:
Couldn't agree more.Half my family turned up to watch the race and Dopey picked the winner fawwon
 |
|
By:
Not a sniff round here, think the closest was 5th
|
|
By:
The aerial shots were diabolical & totally pointless. You want to see close up the field taking on The Chair. What we got instead were 40 tiny specs that appeared like ants from that overhead angle. Pathetic & not what viewers want.
|
|
By:
Rubbish coverage to many gimmicky cutaways, Fitzgerald is rubbish as is Thomas ..bring back Highclear!..this lot have no idea
I will be watching RUK in future, William Hill have a gem in Kate Miller , one to watch.. all in all a total disaster a great occasion ruined |
|
By:
on the midmay course we dont want shots from the inside of the track ,you have persception of where the home straight,bend etc are ridiculous ,i watched ruk
|