Anyone bought Stand Out Stats last week?

James I'm going to spam your inbox to Death Fitzmaurice.

You were 'impressed'? Can you not spot backfitting when you see it? eg "If you'd have backed all trainer A's horses at track number 32 over 7 furlongs on Wednesdays when ridden by a jockey whose surname begins with 'S', riding at a weight between 8-6 and 8-10, you'd have made a 24.6% profit on your stake over the last 10 years". Whoopee!!!

You're going to need a lot of help.

Nigel Droke
March 16, 2013 at 3:33 pm
A work colleague purchased this……and is now actively pusueing the vendor for his money back. Say no more.

David
March 17, 2013 at 3:16 pm

Hi all,
I just stumbled across this article. For any one wanting to know what’s stand out stats is all about and are worried with parting with £300.
DONT SIGN UP FOR IT!!!

Well im not going to spend £299 but if anyone wants to mail me a copy I would be prepared to pay £50.
You can PM me here fourmysins@googlemail.com
Thanks

Oh and I forgot it did make a LSP at the festival last week including 50/1 Carrickboy.

^ net - he pockets £249 - great deal and marketing

Sorry Delta I do not understand you have lost me with that last comment

He sayed thinly veiled £50 cash back offer, I think.

Fitzmaurice got my email somehow and I was swamped with **** from the fat c*nt. even if i blocked them in the junk they still kept coming. I had to unsubscribe about 5 times from various spam that kept been sent.

In respect of anyone using stats, profiles, pointers or anything that relies on the Cookie cutter method of

finding past profits and expecting future ones, well if you were making real cookies the equivalent

product would be that the cookies sure look cookie shaped but the content is poor and contains no choc chips.


Method failure or poor recipe for success, take your pick.

You will be paying £300 to be told that Tom Queally does very well when riding Frankel

if the stats indicate a trainer behaviour i think they can be useful, if as pointed out earlier they are showing complex variables (that have no common sense logic) behind them, you can basically back fit any group of data to show profitable lays or backs and these are just the normal variation in distributions of statistics.

half the battle is knowing if a horse (especially in the rank fare which consists of most racing) is off. if you can identify the way a trainer operates from stats that show clear preferences of getting winners, i think this can be useful.

ie some trainers runners you wouldn't touch on their 3rd start qualifying for hcps, others actually have better records 3rd time out.

unfortunately most stats highlighting profitable relationships of variables usually become aware by the market and the prices adjust over time.

ie mick appleby's turf stats for the last 5 seasons show a profit of over £200 to £1 lsp from about 220 odd runners, there's no way this is going to last

I've kept stats since 1994.
Do I make money?
Sometimes but not regularly
However if I had people paying me for my stats (or tips) then
I WOULD have the stake money to bet on my selections and have a NO LOSE situation. (Or not bet at all and have an income)

Todays best stat concerns a Nmkt stable and 7f maidens with a 3yo colt/gelding in class lower than 4.
Back KOHLAAN to win 5.45

I appreciate all the words of warning but my offer is genuine and still stands to anyone out there who purchased last week and wants to recoup a little bit back. I am at the end of the day a stats nut and even if they sit there gathering dust I still want a copy.

.