If i choose 6 horses, how many lines will i have to cover for a combination tricast?? Probably simple maths but im too busy trying to work out the puzzle in the jlt tomora
ok mad for doing the bet maybe... but please tell me how the hell you came up with 120 lines for any of 6 horses to finished in the first 3 of any order?? your the mad one!
ok mad for doing the bet maybe...but please tell me how the hell you came up with 120 lines for any of 6 horses to finished in the first 3 of any order??your the mad one!
Suppose between them they fill the first 3 places.
You want to collect no matter what order they finish in.
Here are the possibilities with 'a' winning:-
abc abd abe abf acb acd ace acf adb adc ade adf aeb aec aed aef afb afc afd afe
Count them. there's 20 combinations, and that's just with 'a' winning.
Now multiply by 6, because any of the 6 could have won.
Ok - suppose your horses are a,b,c,d,e,fSuppose between them they fill the first 3 places.You want to collect no matter what order they finish in.Here are the possibilities with 'a' winning:-abcabdabeabfacbacdaceacfadbadcadeadfaebaecaedaefafbafcafdaf
there is 20 combinations if you dont need them in the right order. ----------------
To paraphrase Eric Morecambe......
irish_guy_13 - is backing all the 6 horses - "but not necessarily in the right order."
irish_guy_13 11 Mar 13 17:03 there is 20 combinations if you dont need them in the right order.----------------To paraphrase Eric Morecambe......irish_guy_13 - is backing all the 6 horses - "but not necessarily in the right order."
Thanks so its 20 cominations then X6 for finishing in any order which makes 120. ok thanks for the help much appriciated just couldnt get my head round the last bit i was just working it out on my total bet for each combination
what the feck is ur beef saddo??
Thanks so its 20 cominations then X6 for finishing in any order which makes 120.ok thanks for the help much appriciated just couldnt get my head round the last biti was just working it out on my total bet for each combinationwhat the feck is ur beef
ok sorry for calling u mad! was no need for that...but 20 was the answer i was looking for...i already knew the total stake for a single c/t. so was no need for why indulge the idiot let him understake was there?
ok sorry for calling u mad! was no need for that...but 20 was the answer i was looking for...i already knew the total stake for a single c/t. so was no need for why indulge the idiot let him understake was there?