|
By:
how do we interpret the results rollo ?
|
|
By:
rcing,
Each hop is in milliseconds. The less hops you have and the faster your slowest hop, then the faster your connection to the destination site. What you don't want is one hop or more that takes ages and slows you down. |
|
By:
thanks rollo
|
|
By:
17 hops but each one had 3 diff ms nxt to it
eg 7 23ms 27ms 82ms is it the final ms fig that's significant? |
|
By:
Nice thread. Some oldtimers on here from before Betfair lost its way.
|
|
By:
aspy
how did it go for you yesterday with the online feed . was it faster than RUK on sky ? |
|
By:
online ruk was same speed as turf tv.... and about 1 sec infront of ruk tv (sky ty) i from north east uk
|
|
By:
aspy - where abouts in North East as that contradicts all other people I have spoken to in North East ?
|
|
By:
Doubled what do the people you have spoken to say ?
|
|
By:
FWIW I purchased it yesterday and could barely get it ahead of ruk sky. In the odd time it might have been ahead it was under half a second and possibly not worth the hassle of constant refreshes to get a smidgeon ahead and have a worse picture. That said the picture quality is decent.
|
|
By:
most say level with Sky RUK or a fraction behind
|
|
By:
most say level with Sky RUK or a fraction behind
|
|
By:
from thornaby... and use 50 meg line... the picture speed same as turf like i said. picture can jump a little but would rather pay £150 per annum than the 8k or so per annum for turf tv will keep checking over the coming weeks and update !
|
|
By:
Why not just FT it ?
Simples ![]() |
|
By:
Its about half a second quicker than RUK here after 14 hops, it never falls behind RUK but the picture is a little jerky.
Im using it for the sound atm but wont continue with it after month is up. |
|
By:
same here dusty .
picture is jerky which puts me off , but about 0.5 ahead of ruk on sky . is it jerky for everyone that uses it ? |
|
By:
I know what you mean about the jerkiness putting you off rcing.
although its not falling behind, the slight pauses in the picture isnt ideal Im just wondering whether half a second for sound is worth 15 quid a month ??? |
|
By:
if sound is helpful to you go for it . i would pay the £15 a month for a 0.5 quicker pics , but the jerkyness is more off putting than the advantage gained . that's just for me . others may might be able to put up with it though .
|
|
By:
how far ahead is ruk online of bf live video
|
|
By:
Despite claims on here,Turf TV is still ahead of RUK Online.
RUK is 0.5 seconds ahead of RUK TV (depending on your BB speed). |
|
By:
If RUK online is the 0.5 seconds ahead of RUK TV then it is level with Turf TV
![]() |
|
By:
I am confused .... a pretty diagram would be nice
![]() |
|
By:
Anyone know the latest on how RUK compares with Turf TV?
|
|
By:
same speed exactly
|
|
By:
Many Thanks DOUBLED.
|