Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 64 comments are related to the topic:
RUK online now same speed as turf tv ?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 64
By:
rcing
When: 19 Feb 13 17:37
how do we interpret the results rollo ?
By:
Rollo Tomasi
When: 19 Feb 13 17:40
rcing,
Each hop is in milliseconds. The less hops you have and the faster your slowest hop, then the faster your connection to the destination site. What you don't want is one hop or more that takes ages and slows you down.
By:
rcing
When: 19 Feb 13 17:46
thanks rollo
By:
duncan idaho
When: 19 Feb 13 18:10
17 hops but each one had 3 diff ms nxt to it

eg   7    23ms     27ms     82ms


is it the final ms fig that's significant?
By:
frog2
When: 19 Feb 13 20:38
Nice thread. Some oldtimers on here from before Betfair lost its way.
By:
harold_lloyd
When: 20 Feb 13 10:33
aspy

how did it go for you yesterday with the online feed . was it faster than RUK on sky ?
By:
aspy65
When: 20 Feb 13 14:29
online ruk was same speed as turf tv.... and about 1 sec infront of ruk tv (sky ty)   i from north east uk
By:
DOUBLED
When: 20 Feb 13 14:31
aspy - where abouts in North East as that contradicts all other people I have spoken to in North East ?
By:
starfish and coffee
When: 20 Feb 13 14:50
Doubled what do the people you have spoken to say ?
By:
starfish and coffee
When: 20 Feb 13 14:53
FWIW I purchased it yesterday and could barely get it ahead of ruk sky. In the odd time it might have been ahead it was under half a second and possibly not worth the hassle of constant refreshes to get a smidgeon ahead and have a worse picture. That said the picture quality is decent.
By:
DOUBLED
When: 20 Feb 13 15:02
most say level with Sky RUK or a fraction behind
By:
DOUBLED
When: 20 Feb 13 15:02
most say level with Sky RUK or a fraction behind
By:
aspy65
When: 20 Feb 13 15:40
from thornaby... and use 50 meg line...   the picture speed same as turf like i said.  picture can jump a little but would rather pay £150 per annum than the 8k or so per annum for turf tv   will keep checking over the coming weeks and update !
By:
C.F.KANE
When: 20 Feb 13 15:45
Why not just FT it ?

Simples Laugh
By:
dustybin
When: 21 Feb 13 15:33
Its about half a second quicker than RUK here after 14 hops, it never falls behind RUK but the picture is a little jerky.
Im using it for the sound atm but wont continue with it after month is up.
By:
rcing
When: 21 Feb 13 15:54
same here dusty .
picture is jerky which puts me off , but about 0.5 ahead of ruk on sky .

is it jerky for everyone that uses it ?
By:
dustybin
When: 21 Feb 13 16:18
I know what you mean about the jerkiness putting you off rcing.
although its not falling behind, the slight pauses in the picture isnt ideal

Im just wondering whether half a second for sound is worth 15 quid a month ???
By:
rcing
When: 21 Feb 13 16:23
if sound is helpful to you go for it . i would pay the £15 a month for a 0.5 quicker pics , but the jerkyness is more off putting than the advantage gained . that's just for me . others may might be able to put up with it though .
By:
cyprusal
When: 21 Feb 13 22:21
how far ahead is ruk online of bf live video
By:
racingstar
When: 21 Feb 13 22:28
Despite claims on here,Turf TV is still ahead of RUK Online.
RUK is 0.5 seconds ahead of RUK TV (depending on your BB speed).
By:
DOUBLED
When: 22 Feb 13 08:28
If RUK online is the 0.5 seconds ahead of RUK TV then it is level with Turf TV Confused
By:
undern
When: 22 Feb 13 09:41
I am confused .... a pretty diagram would be nice Laugh
By:
commander
When: 20 Aug 13 16:47
Anyone know the latest on how RUK compares with Turf TV?
By:
DOUBLED
When: 20 Aug 13 16:51
same speed exactly
By:
commander
When: 20 Aug 13 16:53
Many Thanks DOUBLED.
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com