Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
could cost you a lot of money
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/18/judge_tells_man_delete_tweets/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/02/18/judge_tells_man_delete_tweets/
Show More
Don't know the whole story, but I think Toby Pedley lost his job with a bookmaker after having his tweets pointed out by someone, who may well have been Carl Harris. His grievance goes deep.
Allegedly
BTW saying "allegedly" doesn't stop you from being sued, I believe.
Allegedly
BTW saying "allegedly" doesn't stop you from being sued, I believe.
fine line between freedom of speech, and libeling and hounding a man for well over a year
brimardon will be delighted, lets 'they' hound him now.
A Twitter user has been ordered to delete tweets, tweet an apology and pay £7,500 to another Twitter user in a judgment handed down by the High Court of Justice, Leeds Queens Bench Division last week.
Judge Gosnell ordered Toby Pedley to delete all tweets relating to racing boss Carl Harris and his partner, and to pay a hefty sum in damages. Pedley must pay Harris £7,500 in damages and £10,000 in legal costs. Pedley also has to post a correction and apology to Harris on his Twitter account @THFCP1980 by 4pm on the 28 February
Well done the net is closing in libel tipsters at your peril hit them in the pocket hundreds of thousands not a few thousand.
Judge Gosnell ordered Toby Pedley to delete all tweets relating to racing boss Carl Harris and his partner, and to pay a hefty sum in damages. Pedley must pay Harris £7,500 in damages and £10,000 in legal costs. Pedley also has to post a correction and apology to Harris on his Twitter account @THFCP1980 by 4pm on the 28 February
Well done the net is closing in libel tipsters at your peril hit them in the pocket hundreds of thousands not a few thousand.
Well done the net is closing in libel tipsters at your peril hit them in the pocket hundreds of thousands not a few thousand.
Just for anyone who is not well up on the law, can you clarify if it is libel to draw peoples attention to this;
http://www.asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudications/2012/1/Brimardon/SHP_ADJ_169312.aspx
Thanks in advance
Just for anyone who is not well up on the law, can you clarify if it is libel to draw peoples attention to this;
http://www.asa.org.uk/Rulings/Adjudications/2012/1/Brimardon/SHP_ADJ_169312.aspx
Thanks in advance
Oh phukc............you might be guilty of libel.......3 words that might do it.....character,involved and mislead.
Like my first wedding,had a crib board to remember the order of service..............she said just think of me.
Aisle Alter You............chanted it in my sleep and it came out.............I Will Alter You.............phukc me she was right.......................until the festival.
Like my first wedding,had a crib board to remember the order of service..............she said just think of me.
Aisle Alter You............chanted it in my sleep and it came out.............I Will Alter You.............phukc me she was right.......................until the festival.
gt mole you are the biggest troll on betfair by a long way we are targeted because we are very good that causes jealousy to a very few as most would say good luck you must put the work in to have that amount of profit every year.
you do not get successful trolling and forum posting at every oppertunity spend some time on the form become successful at backing horses
you do not get successful trolling and forum posting at every oppertunity spend some time on the form become successful at backing horses
brimardon1 19 Feb 13 12:44
gt mole you are the biggest troll on betfair by a long way we are targeted because we are very good that causes jealousy to a very few as most would say good luck you must put the work in to have that amount of profit every year.
you do not get successful trolling and forum posting at every oppertunity spend some time on the form become successful at backing horses
good point tbf !
gt mole you are the biggest troll on betfair by a long way we are targeted because we are very good that causes jealousy to a very few as most would say good luck you must put the work in to have that amount of profit every year.
you do not get successful trolling and forum posting at every oppertunity spend some time on the form become successful at backing horses
good point tbf !
The asa decision would be overturned in a court of law imo they say for the last 28 years we have not had a ratings system thats easy to overturn we have had a seperate ratings system.
This is a piece of horse racing history the first time ever that a profit of £37,500 has been proven ever
The adjudication from the ASA for fairness as the troll has posted a negative asa adjudication without showing a fair one.
Video proof of the £37,500 won. We placed an advert in The Racing Post with our claim of £37,500 PROFIT 375+ POINTS We had to provide all our evidence over many months to assist the regulators who went over our advertisement with a fine toothcomb. We explained all selections were proofed in advance of the races taking place by time stamped e-mail on a regulated proofing spreadsheet that includes date, time, race meeting, horse, amount of money on the bet, bookmakers price (no exchange prices allowed) and a screen shot to prove that price, to our chartered accountants and to The Racing Post. We sent our master copy of our proofing spreadsheet which contained details of the selected horse, race time meeting and odds as per above, the Chartered accountants provided copies of time and date-stamped emails in support of the claim to the regulator. We also sent screenshots from the relevant bookmaker's websites to prove the availability of the prices on the bookmakers websites. It takes a considerable amount of time to do this everyday to abide to strict regulations and to support any challenge made against any profits or winners we advertise. The regulators stated the proofs were from the Brimardon horse racing selections and they noted that the running total at the end of the period, set out in their master spreadsheet, exceeded the £37,000 figure stated in the ad. (In fact profits had been understated and in excess of £37,500.) Each recommended bet was lodged independently, by e-mail, with The Racing Post and Brimardons Chartered accountants before each race. The regulator requested Brimardon to provide copies of over 100 of the proof e-mails, showing wins, throughout the relevant period. The regulator also requested for The Racing Post to provide a smaller sample of emails received, which we selected at random. The regulator assessed the data and noted that the selections sent to both the accountants and The Racing Post corresponded with Brimardon's master record which verified that the e-mails were sent before the start of the relevant races, which was confirmed by the electronic date and time stamp in the e-mails. Furthermore, the regulator had noted from the sample of sent e-mails provided by The Racing Post that the dates, times and content of the e-mails corresponded with the received versions held by Brimardon's accountants. The regulator also noted Brimardon included screen shots from the relevant bookmaker's website confirming the availability of the recommended odds for the horses Brimardon had advised. Because the regulator considered that the two selections of proofing e-mails provided by the Brimardons accountants and The Racing Post verified the accuracy of Brimardons records concluded that Brimardon had substantiated the profit claims. Our advert was investigated by the regulators who looked at the advert to see if it complied with substantiation, honesty and being truthful we were found to be 100% correct in our profit claim. The advert for the £37,500 profit was truthful, honest and substantiated We believe it's the first time in the history of horse racing that anyone has ever proven by a regulated third party that they made a substantial profit of £37,500. You hear it all the time that tipsters or systems do not make money they are wrong, the best do make money and we now have the full truth in black and white. A full copy of this historic document is available by request. The above is printed as it's openly available on the www. but you will struggle to find it because all the horseracing tipster/ system review websites are corrupt they sell you the tipster/ systems they own/ take a cut themselves. Some racing websites and a lot of horse racing forums frequented by habitual losers and trolls do not want you to know that any good systems and racing services make money so we've have brought it to your attention so you can see the truth. We make money as proof above so never let anyone tell you that systems do not work. Remember only The Racing Post have the required independent proofing system required by the authorities. Other none regulated Tipster/ System proofing sites and the same review websites and all forums should be viewed with caution. It's not regulated on the internet here are the golden rules to save your money. If they do not have a UK office with a normal number like ours 01423 705322 then don't join NEVER A MOBILE NUMBER. If they review other tipsters and systems then it's 100% sure they will sell you something better NEVER TOUCH THEM. All horse racing Forums have many trolls and habitual losers if you take note of losers you will become one yourself, only take advice from winners and they are not on horse racing forums wasting time they are finding the next winners. See our advert in the Racing Post every week
This is a piece of horse racing history the first time ever that a profit of £37,500 has been proven ever
The adjudication from the ASA for fairness as the troll has posted a negative asa adjudication without showing a fair one.
Video proof of the £37,500 won. We placed an advert in The Racing Post with our claim of £37,500 PROFIT 375+ POINTS We had to provide all our evidence over many months to assist the regulators who went over our advertisement with a fine toothcomb. We explained all selections were proofed in advance of the races taking place by time stamped e-mail on a regulated proofing spreadsheet that includes date, time, race meeting, horse, amount of money on the bet, bookmakers price (no exchange prices allowed) and a screen shot to prove that price, to our chartered accountants and to The Racing Post. We sent our master copy of our proofing spreadsheet which contained details of the selected horse, race time meeting and odds as per above, the Chartered accountants provided copies of time and date-stamped emails in support of the claim to the regulator. We also sent screenshots from the relevant bookmaker's websites to prove the availability of the prices on the bookmakers websites. It takes a considerable amount of time to do this everyday to abide to strict regulations and to support any challenge made against any profits or winners we advertise. The regulators stated the proofs were from the Brimardon horse racing selections and they noted that the running total at the end of the period, set out in their master spreadsheet, exceeded the £37,000 figure stated in the ad. (In fact profits had been understated and in excess of £37,500.) Each recommended bet was lodged independently, by e-mail, with The Racing Post and Brimardons Chartered accountants before each race. The regulator requested Brimardon to provide copies of over 100 of the proof e-mails, showing wins, throughout the relevant period. The regulator also requested for The Racing Post to provide a smaller sample of emails received, which we selected at random. The regulator assessed the data and noted that the selections sent to both the accountants and The Racing Post corresponded with Brimardon's master record which verified that the e-mails were sent before the start of the relevant races, which was confirmed by the electronic date and time stamp in the e-mails. Furthermore, the regulator had noted from the sample of sent e-mails provided by The Racing Post that the dates, times and content of the e-mails corresponded with the received versions held by Brimardon's accountants. The regulator also noted Brimardon included screen shots from the relevant bookmaker's website confirming the availability of the recommended odds for the horses Brimardon had advised. Because the regulator considered that the two selections of proofing e-mails provided by the Brimardons accountants and The Racing Post verified the accuracy of Brimardons records concluded that Brimardon had substantiated the profit claims. Our advert was investigated by the regulators who looked at the advert to see if it complied with substantiation, honesty and being truthful we were found to be 100% correct in our profit claim. The advert for the £37,500 profit was truthful, honest and substantiated We believe it's the first time in the history of horse racing that anyone has ever proven by a regulated third party that they made a substantial profit of £37,500. You hear it all the time that tipsters or systems do not make money they are wrong, the best do make money and we now have the full truth in black and white. A full copy of this historic document is available by request. The above is printed as it's openly available on the www. but you will struggle to find it because all the horseracing tipster/ system review websites are corrupt they sell you the tipster/ systems they own/ take a cut themselves. Some racing websites and a lot of horse racing forums frequented by habitual losers and trolls do not want you to know that any good systems and racing services make money so we've have brought it to your attention so you can see the truth. We make money as proof above so never let anyone tell you that systems do not work. Remember only The Racing Post have the required independent proofing system required by the authorities. Other none regulated Tipster/ System proofing sites and the same review websites and all forums should be viewed with caution. It's not regulated on the internet here are the golden rules to save your money. If they do not have a UK office with a normal number like ours 01423 705322 then don't join NEVER A MOBILE NUMBER. If they review other tipsters and systems then it's 100% sure they will sell you something better NEVER TOUCH THEM. All horse racing Forums have many trolls and habitual losers if you take note of losers you will become one yourself, only take advice from winners and they are not on horse racing forums wasting time they are finding the next winners. See our advert in the Racing Post every week
"they are not on horse racing forums wasting time they are finding the next winners"
brimardon , seen as your selections are done by a computer program which can't be replicated , why not show the previous selections and where they finished with SP ?
So from this we can assume every tipster is 100% perfect and never, ever, ever sell duff/made up info.
Wait till i launch my service...."My mole in a top yard told me today to go away and he never would tell me anything even if he knew and to stop pestering him. My service is £1000000000 up to a £1 stake in the last year...blah blah blah"
Wait till i launch my service...."My mole in a top yard told me today to go away and he never would tell me anything even if he knew and to stop pestering him. My service is £1000000000 up to a £1 stake in the last year...blah blah blah"
The bests are filtered through various angles before being sent out compared to the old days the strike rates have improved and we have near enough elimated the age old problem of long losing runs.
The days of the big prices winners are going i will explain below, Kettys warbler? 66/1 the owner rang us up and said the trainer told him it could not win seem to remember the system remembered the form from a few years back it had won on that ground and had it top rated because of the fall in the weights
we had regular 100/1 and 66/1 they no longer seem to be as frequent in horseracing because of betfair.
Our old 2o/1 and 25/1 winners are now 12/1 14/1 16/1 because of betfair but the losers are far bigger prices.
Our strike rates have improved because of betfair.
Betfair has changed horseracing as we knew it and you have to change and understand those changes.
We have a lot of knowledge and quite happy to share it but the trolls spoil it for everyone the likes of gt mole and his lots of user names have ruined the forum so our winning knowledge and help which is very scarce on this forum is lost.
The days of the big prices winners are going i will explain below, Kettys warbler? 66/1 the owner rang us up and said the trainer told him it could not win seem to remember the system remembered the form from a few years back it had won on that ground and had it top rated because of the fall in the weights
we had regular 100/1 and 66/1 they no longer seem to be as frequent in horseracing because of betfair.
Our old 2o/1 and 25/1 winners are now 12/1 14/1 16/1 because of betfair but the losers are far bigger prices.
Our strike rates have improved because of betfair.
Betfair has changed horseracing as we knew it and you have to change and understand those changes.
We have a lot of knowledge and quite happy to share it but the trolls spoil it for everyone the likes of gt mole and his lots of user names have ruined the forum so our winning knowledge and help which is very scarce on this forum is lost.
that post will deffo resul in a tipping challenge from the mole now, you up for it lad.
that's great , but , the question is . seen as your selections are done by a computer program which can't be replicated , why not show the previous selections and where they finished with SP
quite happy to discuss computers in horseracing, betfair,the general we are not here for previous results they dont win you anything now Cheltenham which we have cleaned up on thats up for a chat
why not be transparent ?
have you something to hide ?
any good tipping service shows previous tips and P+L to SP for each tip
have you something to hide ?
any good tipping service shows previous tips and P+L to SP for each tip
Never having been one to take any notice of Tipsters brimardon 1 you make me laugh...
I have never attempted to read in all my life such drivel.Anyone who subscribes to such a service must need parts of their body looked at.
You had regular 100/1 and 66/1 winners (!) and still turned over a profit.
Feck me you must have had some losers !!
I have never attempted to read in all my life such drivel.Anyone who subscribes to such a service must need parts of their body looked at.
You had regular 100/1 and 66/1 winners (!) and still turned over a profit.
Feck me you must have had some losers !!
The asa decision would be overturned in a court of law imo
Will you be taking it to court then?
Will you be taking it to court then?
For the first in living memory, I agree with homefortea.
I will not, however, back with off course bookmakers.
Strange that every tipster has a mole in a yard except that yards that matter. Curley, Prescott, Jones, Best, Quinlan, Butler 
Took your advice Brim,stayed off the forum (never even look during racing hours btw).............looked at form for a while and it made no difference at all..............STILL WON without a computer generated load of bollox or a bet I didnt need to have.
Btw a few questions asked by the forum you failed (again) to answer?
I have one for you........OF THE CLAIMED £37,000 profit (not disputing btw,but to £100/200 staking units is not difficult to achieve).............HOW MUCH have your clients added to their banks SINCE the ADVERT or has there been an erosion?
TIA
Btw a few questions asked by the forum you failed (again) to answer?
I have one for you........OF THE CLAIMED £37,000 profit (not disputing btw,but to £100/200 staking units is not difficult to achieve).............HOW MUCH have your clients added to their banks SINCE the ADVERT or has there been an erosion?
TIA
?
ASA have not received your complaint Brim?
BF are however investigating all your grassing of forumites.
NAP
ASA have not received your complaint Brim?
BF are however investigating all your grassing of forumites.
NAP
Indeed , i recieved a yellow card for accusations about the goings on in his basement
Matters not what he claims...............said more than reasonable and lied...............?
OR................FORUM ruined by trolls.............GTMOLE?
When exactly was this forum ruined Brim?
When you got pis$ed off when your trolling user names SELLING your shyte was exposed?
You are a thieving,lying PIECE OF SCUM..............FACT.
NOW SUE ME?
OR SHOULD I SUE YOU................or just go the simple criminal route?
When exactly was this forum ruined Brim?
When you got pis$ed off when your trolling user names SELLING your shyte was exposed?
You are a thieving,lying PIECE OF SCUM..............FACT.
NOW SUE ME?
OR SHOULD I SUE YOU................or just go the simple criminal route?
??????????????????????????????
Not me worrying Brimardon...........provide something or take me to Court for libel...........Criminal is your only chance of a not guilty.
12 V 1................price it up son?
Bear in mind I might have prejudiced the outcome on here.............1.02 you go inside? Buying money.
Not me worrying Brimardon...........provide something or take me to Court for libel...........Criminal is your only chance of a not guilty.
12 V 1................price it up son?
Bear in mind I might have prejudiced the outcome on here.............1.02 you go inside? Buying money.
1,143 views Brim...........................you are popular.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539