Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
BJG
04 Oct 12 12:40
Joined:
Date Joined: 20 Aug 07
| Topic/replies: 29,810 | Blogger: BJG's blog
with serious breaches of the Rules of Racing





Following an investigation into suspicious betting activity on a number of races, the British Horseracing Authority has charged nine individuals with serious breaches of the Rules of Racing. The allegations focus on horses being laid to lose on betting exchanges in races that took place between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011.

Former licensed jockey Andrew Heffernan (who is currently licensed to ride in Australia) and eight unlicensed individuals (Rocky Michael Chopra, James Coppinger, Paul Garner, Kelly Inglis, Yogesh Joshee, Douglas Shelley, Pravin Shingadia and Mark Wilson) have all been charged with a breach of Rule (A)41.2 of the Rules of Racing in that they conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by:

In the case of Heffernan, communicating directly or indirectly to one or more Betting Exchange account holders information relating to the prospects in the race of that horse
In the case of the unlicensed individuals by placing bets and/or causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to to place bets on the horse Andrew Heffernan rode in the race using information they had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse.
Andrew Heffernan is also charged with breaches of:

Rule (A)36.1 in that he communicated directly or indirectly to one or more account holders on betting exchanges, for material reward, gift, favour or benefit in kind, information relating to the prospects of his rides, which was or included Inside Information knowing, such information was Inside Information
Rule (A)33.4 in that he offered to receive or receive a bribe
Rule (B)59.2 in that he intentionally failed to ensure that a horse ridden by him was run on its merits (Wanchai Whisper, Gallantry, and/or Silver Guest).
Of the unlicensed individuals, Rocky Michael Chopra, Paul Garner, Yogesh Joshee, Douglas Shelley and Mark Wilson have also been charged with breaches of Rule (A)33.1.2 in that they offered bribes to Andrew Heffernan.

Kelly Inglis is also charged with a breach of Rule (A)33.4 in that she connived with Andrew Heffernan to offer to receive a bribe or bribes from Rocky Michael Chopra, Paul Garner, Yogesh Joshee, Douglas Shelley and Mark Wilson.

Paul Garner is also charged with a breach of Rule (C)64.2.1 in that he placed lay bets on horses trained by Alan McCabe at a time when he was entered on the Register of Stable Employees at Alan McCabe’s yard.


THE CHARGES

In relation to the running of:

1. WANCHAI WHISPER on 28th January 2011 at 15.25 at Lingfield, and/or
2. GALLANTRY on 2nd February 2011 at 19.20 at Kempton and/or
3. SILVER GUEST on 9th February 2011 at 13.55 at Lingfield.

AND in the period between about 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011.

AND in respect of the Races identified in the Table in Notes for Editors.


Andrew Heffernan

Did ANDREW HEFFERNAN on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by communicating directly or indirectly to one or more Betting Exchange account holders information relating to the prospects in the race of that horse which was or included information (i) obtained in his capacity as a licensed person and (ii) which was not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’) specifically that he would take steps or omit to ride the horse so as to prevent the horse from achieving its best possible placing, knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case and knowing that such information would or might be used to gain an unfair advantage in the betting market?

2. Did ANDREW HEFFERNAN on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit corrupt or fraudulent practice by communicating directly or indirectly to one or more Betting Exchange account holders information relating to the prospects in the race of that horse which was or included information (i) obtained in his capacity as a licensed person and (ii) which was not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case and knowing that such information would or might be used to gain an unfair advantage in the betting market?

3. In relation to WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, SILVER GUEST, and/or the horses named in the appended Table and/or other races unidentified in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011, did ANDREW HEFFERNAN on, and/or before, the date of the race act in breach of Rule (A)36.1 in that he communicated directly or indirectly to one or more account holders on betting exchanges, for material reward, gift, favour or benefit in kind, information relating to the prospects of his rides, which was or included Inside Information knowing, such information was Inside Information?

4. In the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 did ANDREW HEFFERNAN offer to receive or received a bribe or bribes from ROCKY MICHAEL CHOPRA, MARK WILSON, PAUL GARNER, DOUGLAS SHELLEY, YOGESH JOSHEE, and/or persons unknown in breach of Rule (A)33.4

5. In relation to WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST, did ANDREW HEFFERNAN act in breach of Rule (B)59.2 by intentionally failing to ensure that the horse was run on its merits?


Rocky Michael Chopra

1. Did ROCKY MICHAEL CHOPRA on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by placing bets and/or causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to to place bets on the horse ANDREW HEFFERNAN rode in the race using information he had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse which was or included information (i) obtained by the Jockey or other licensed person in their capacity as licensed persons which was (ii) not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), and knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case, and that such information would provide an unfair advantage in the betting market?

2. In the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 did ROCKY MICHAEL CHOPRA offer a bribe to ANDREW HEFFERNAN in breach of Rule (A)33.1.2.


James Coppinger

1. Did JAMES COPPINGER on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by placing bets and/or causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to place bets on the horse ANDREW HEFFERNAN rode in the race using information he had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse which was or included information (i) obtained by the Jockey or other licensed person in their capacity as licensed persons which was (ii) not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), and knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case, and that such information would provide an unfair advantage in the betting market?


Paul Garner

1. Did PAUL GARNER on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended Table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by placing bets and/or causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to place bets on the horse ANDREW HEFFERNAN rode in the race using information he had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse which was or included information (i) obtained by the Jockey or other licensed person in their capacity as licensed persons which was (ii) not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), and knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case, and that such information would provide an unfair advantage in the betting market?

2. In the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011, did PAUL GARNER offer a bribe to ANDREW HEFFERNAN in breach of Rule (A)33.1.2

3. In the period 9th January 2011 to 18th February 2011, at a time when he was entered on the Register of Stable Employees at Alan McCabe’s yard did PAUL GARNER act in breach of Rule (C)64.2.1 in that he placed a lay bet on horses that Alan McCabe trained namely:

(i) CITY LEGEND in its race on 10th January 2011 at 14.05 at Wolverhampton and/or
(ii) ELUSIVE WARRIOR in its race on 17th February 2011 at 14.20 at Southwell.


Kelly Inglis

1. Did KELLY INGLIS on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that she conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to place bets on the horse ANDREW HEFFERNAN rode in the race using information she had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse which was or included information (i) obtained by the Jockey or other licensed person in their capacity as licensed persons which was (ii) not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), and knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case, and that such information would provide an unfair advantage in the betting market?

2. In the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011, did KELLY INGLIS connive with ANDREW HEFFERNAN to offer to receive or receive a bribe or bribes from ROCKY MICHAEL CHOPRA, MARK WILSON, PAUL GARNER, DOUGLAS SHELLEY, YOGESH JOSHEE, and/or persons unknown in breach of Rule (A)33.4


Yogesh Joshee

1. Did YOGESH JOSHEE on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by placing bets and/or causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to place bets the horse ANDREW HEFFERNAN rode in the race using information he had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse which was or included information (i) obtained by the Jockey or other licensed person in their capacity as licensed persons which was (ii) not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), and knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case, and that such information would provide an unfair advantage in the betting market?

2. In the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011, did YOGESH JOSHEE offer a bribe to ANDREW HEFFERNAN in breach of Rule (A)33.1.2


Douglas Shelley

1. Did DOUGLAS SHELLEY on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by placing bets and/or causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to place bets the horse ANDREW HEFFERNAN rode in the race using information he had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse which was or included information (i) obtained by the Jockey or other licensed person in their capacity as licensed persons which was (ii) not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), and knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case, and that such information would provide an unfair advantage in the betting market?

2. In the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011, did DOUGLAS SHELLEY offer a bribe to ANDREW HEFFERNAN in breach of Rule (A)33.1.2


Pravin Shingadia

1. Did PRAVIN SHINGADIA on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by placing bets and/or causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to place bets on the horse ANDREW HEFFERNAN rode in the race using information he had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse which was or included information (i) obtained by the Jockey or other licensed person in their capacity as licensed persons which was (ii) not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), and knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case, and that such information would provide an unfair advantage in the betting market?


Mark Wilson

1. Did MARK WILSON on, and/or before, the date of the races of WANCHAI WHISPER, GALLANTRY, and/or SILVER GUEST and/or in the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011 and/or in relation to the horses named in the appended table act in breach of Rule (A)41.2 in that he conspired with other persons to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice by placing bets and/or causing one or more other Betting Exchange account holders to place bets on the horse ANDREW HEFFERNAN rode in the race using information he had received directly or indirectly from the Jockey or other licensed person relating to the prospects in the race of the named horse which was or included information (i) obtained by the Jockey or other licensed person in their capacity as licensed persons which was (ii) not publicly available or authorised for such disclosure by the Rules of Racing (‘Inside Information’), and knowing that (i) and (ii) were the case, and that such information would provide an unfair advantage in the betting market?

2. In the period between 1st November 2010 and 31st March 2011, did MARK WILSON offer a bribe to ANDREW HEFFERNAN in breach of Rule (A)33.1.2


Notes to Editors:

1. A comment from Paul Scotney, Director of Integrity Services, Compliance and Licensing, will be issued separately. Please note that it is BHA policy not to comment further on ongoing investigations or pending a Disciplinary Panel hearing.

2. The date of the hearing will be announced in due course.

3. Details of Rules and guideline penalties for the offences in question are as follows:

Rule (A)41.2
A Person who conspires with any other Person for the commission of such a practice shall be taken to have contravened a requirement imposed on him by these Rules.
Entry Point: Disqualify/Exclude 3 years
Range: 6 months - 10 years

Rule (A)36.1
Inside Information is information about the likely participation or likely performance of a horse in a race, which
36.1.1 is known by an Owner, Trainer, Rider, stable employee or any of their service providers as a result of acting as such, and
36.1.2 is not information in the public domain.
A Person must not communicate Inside Information directly or indirectly to any other Person for any material reward, gift, favour or benefit in kind.
Entry Point: Disqualify 3 years
Range: 18 months - 5 years

Rule (A)33
A Person must not give or offer a bribe, or promise a bribe, to a Person who is a Trainer, Rider, agent or other Person having charge of, or access to, a horse must not accept or offer to accept any bribe in any form.
Entry Point: Disqualify 3 years
Range: 3 months - 10 years

Rule (B)59.2
A Rider of a horse shall be taken to have contravened the requirement imposed on him by Rule 58.1 where the Stewards or the Authority consider that the Rider has intentionally failed to ensure that his horse is run on its merits.

a) Deliberately not riding a horse to obtain the best possible placing for personal reward or knowing that it had been layed to lose
Entry Point: Disqualify 8 years
Range: 5 - 25 years

b) Deliberately preventing a horse from winning
Entry Point: 3 years
Range: 1 - 5 years

c) Purposely not riding out a horse that would otherwise have won
Entry Point: 3 years
Range: 1 - 5 years

Rule (C)64.2.1
A Person whose name is or has been entered on the Register of Stable Employee Names must not lay with a Betting Organisation any horse under the care or control of the trainer for whom he is employed to lose a race,
Entry Point: Disqualify 18 months
Range: 3 months - 10 years

4. Table of Races

No.

Date

Course & Time

Race Details

Horse

4.12.10

Southwell 12:20

Toteplacepot Win Without Backing A Winner Maiden Auction Stakes

MUJAPISTE

10.12.10

Southwell 11:20

Toteplacepot Win Without Backing a Winner Selling Stakes

HIGH KICKIN

11.12.10

Southwell 13:10

40 Live Football Markets At Totesport.com Selling Stakes

CROCODILE BAY

28.1.11

Lingfield 15:25

Fred & Ron Gibson Memorial Handicap

WANCHAI WHISPER

2.2.11

Lingfield 16:40

Play Rainbow Riches At Bluesq.com Handicap

JUNGLE BAY

2.2.11

Kempton 19:20

**** Mobile Apps Handicap

GALLANTRY

4.2.11

Wolverhampton 18:30

Stay At The Wolverhampton Holiday Inn Handicap

PETOMIC

9.2.11

Lingfield 13:55

Ashurst Wood Classified Claiming Stakes

SILVER GUEST

8.3.11

Southwell 13:40

Hospitality at Southwell Racecourse Handicap (Div I)

IT’S A MANS WORLD



For more information contact:

Robin Mounsey
British Horseracing Authority
t:02071520048
m:07584171551
e: rmounsey@britishhorseracing.com

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 101
By:
salmon spray
When: 04 Oct 12 12:41
Bloody footballers at it now       Mischief
Allegedly.
By:
BJG
When: 04 Oct 12 12:44
Poor skint fkers dem footballers Plain
By:
Roger De Bris
When: 04 Oct 12 12:46
theyre all at it....ffs..
By:
wee eck
When: 04 Oct 12 12:51
This passing of this type of information imo is happening many times a day.
By:
Blades
When: 04 Oct 12 12:57
TIP OF THE ICEBERG!!!!
By:
wee eck
When: 04 Oct 12 12:59
Rife.GrinGrin
By:
pixie
When: 04 Oct 12 13:02
Been going on for years and will continue to go on for years. Probably happening more now that it easier to profit from non-triers since the advent of exchanges but easier to catch them now tho with an audit trail rather than in the days of Banks throwing brown envelopes into the back of John Francome's car.
By:
guinness2dear
When: 04 Oct 12 13:05
I suppose it's a coincidence that these were AW meets..
By:
BJG
When: 04 Oct 12 13:06
U are correct wee eck
By:
wee eck
When: 04 Oct 12 13:09
pixie, it is impossible through lack of manpower and finance to police horseracing properly

where one or two supposed or alleged crooks might be investigated hundreds of others who may

or may not have been detected are filling their boots.
By:
shudacuda
When: 04 Oct 12 13:10
Always trying.
By:
barry dennis
When: 04 Oct 12 13:15
wee eck, before exchanges they came to us on-course bookmakers and asked us to take a couple of grand out of a 10/1 chance at lingfield on a january a/w meeting,  there were loads of mugs with readies just waiting to back drifters.
By:
wee eck
When: 04 Oct 12 13:20
barry, I agree with what you say, but the scenario you paint, with the advent

of the exchanges has escalated a hundredfold.
By:
barry dennis
When: 04 Oct 12 13:23
agree,wee eck, but the blind cannot see
By:
Do wah Diddy
When: 04 Oct 12 13:25
THESE TYPE OF PEOPLE ARE OUT THERE IN THE COMMUNITY ,THEIR DRESSED AS JOCKEYS,PLUMBERS ELECTRICIANS,NEIGBOURS FRIENDS AND DRESSED AS NAPOLEAN ANDTHE SPICEGIRLS AT FANCY DRESS PARTIES ALL TRYING TO GET MONEY FROM YOU BY DECEIPT

YOU CANT TRUST ANYONE WHO YOU DONT KNOW AND THERES VERY FEW WHO YOU CAN TRUST THAT YOU KNOW
By:
Do wah Diddy
When: 04 Oct 12 13:27
ITS A VERY CORRUPT WORLD THAT WE LIVE IN ,AND PEOPLE WALK ABOUT AS THOUGH THEIR LITTLE ANGELS
By:
shudacuda
When: 04 Oct 12 13:29
Just wait till judgement day
By:
Anaglogs Daughter
When: 04 Oct 12 13:36
03 Oct 2012 12:55


British Horseracing Authority comment following betting-related charges being issued

 



 







Paul Scotney, Director of Integrity Services, Compliance and Licensing for the British Horseracing Authority (BHA), said:

“The charges BHA has issued today are the result of a long and complicated investigation. This process has taken significant time and resources. However, investigations such as these are very similar to fraud investigations and as such are complex and time consuming. Furthermore, we encountered difficulties in obtaining telephone records from certain individuals who refused to co-operate. This resulted in us having to make a number of applications to the High Court for orders against their mobile telephone service providers for disclosure of the relevant records.

“We hope that today’s announcement demonstrates our commitment to deterring and detecting wrong-doing and taking action against those who we believe to have breached the Rules. However, racegoers and those betting on British Racing should be reassured that instances of this nature are extremely rare and that the overwhelming majority of races are free of suspicion.”


Notes to Editors:


1. It is BHA policy not to comment further on ongoing investigations or pending a Disciplinary Panel hearing.

2. The full notice detailing the charges issued can be found here: http://www.britishhorseracing.presscentre.com/Press-Releases/Former-British-licensed-jockey-Andrew-Heffernan-and-eight-unlicensed-individuals-charged-with-serious-breaches-of-the-Rules-of-Racing-303.aspx





For more information contact:



Robin Mounsey
British Horseracing Authority
t:02071520048
m:07584171551
e: rmounsey@britishhorseracing.com
By:
bobbybocala
When: 04 Oct 12 13:40
anybody betting on AW racing deserves to be taken to the cleaners.......its as plain as the nose on yer face......its rotten to the core.....jockeys ......owners....trainers..........they are all the same......the north of england flat isnt far behind......but the AW is out on its own......if ya get caught then put the license in the wifes name......and carry on regardless.......
By:
Anaglogs Daughter
When: 04 Oct 12 13:41
Andrew heffernan has been stood down by racing New South Wales stewards on Wednesday. Ray murrihy says these are very serious charges
He will have to return to England to face the charge which include not letting horses run on their merits and soliciting and taking bribes
By:
alun2005
When: 04 Oct 12 13:43
I can't wait to see ATR (and RUK for that matter) getting to the very bottom of all this. My guess is that they have carried out their own fearless investigations into this matter, doorstepping every name involved at the very least, and getting some on-camera quotes from all concerned.

Not for ATR the easy option of having presenters on shows like 'Get In' telling us all that jockeys, trainers and owners are all 'lovely lads'. Perish the thought.
By:
wee eck
When: 04 Oct 12 13:47
alun, when one of these varmints gets suspended for breaking

the rules the Momsers on ATR and RUK form a guard of honour

to welcome the midgets back when their suspension ends.
By:
bobbybocala
When: 04 Oct 12 13:47
AW racing is the equine version of WWF.......most of it is simulation......the pictures should carry a warning.......
By:
Lightbulbs Fan Club
When: 04 Oct 12 13:47
Word reaches me that Mick Fitzgerald will head up the crack team of investigators, with the unrelenting support of Zoey Bird and Simon Mapletoft to assist him in cracking down on such wrong-doing.....
By:
Roger De Bris
When: 04 Oct 12 13:50
until the penalties are stiffer, they will carry on regardless.
By:
alun2005
When: 04 Oct 12 13:52
My guess is that  hard men of ATR, Weasel and Lukewarm will tear up every tree to find and publicise any wrongdoers in racing. No way back for any miscreants when these lads get hold of their prey.
By:
pixie
When: 04 Oct 12 14:08
wee eck 04 Oct 12 13:09 
pixie, it is impossible through lack of manpower and finance to police horseracing properly

where one or two supposed or alleged crooks might be investigated hundreds of others who may

or may not have been detected are filling their boots.


I couldn't agree with you more. Roger has a point too tho, if they massively increased the penalties and dished out life bans less may be inclined to risk making an easy buck.
By:
boyce
When: 04 Oct 12 14:08
l
By:
maxheadroom
When: 04 Oct 12 14:15
owner of wanchai wisper on that day KOO!!!
By:
greedkillsmybankagain
When: 04 Oct 12 14:17
Shocked
By:
ima_mazed66
When: 04 Oct 12 14:27
No this can't be true, they wouldn't target a struggling low profile jockey like Andrew Heffernan, they would obviously use a then current and 6 times champion, multiple Derby and Group 1 winning jockey Like Kieren Fallon, just as they clearly did with Ballinger Ridge. Laugh
By:
sparrow
When: 04 Oct 12 14:27
The idea that it is all to do with the AW and the exchanges is ridiculous. The difference is that we get to know about the skullduggery these days. Do people really think, that in the old days little went on and the bookmakers would tell us all about it?
By:
yorkie1
When: 04 Oct 12 14:30
what a fookin mess - you wonder if you can believe what ye fookin watchin sometimes.....
By:
unbiased
When: 04 Oct 12 14:30
What I will continue to disagree agree with is people blaming the introduction of the exchanges for wrongdoings.
  There always has been,and always will be,means of doing wrong,in one form or another.However it doesn't mean you have to do wrong.
Money creates corruption,not the exchanges.
As an example how many of us have said no to adultery,but the opportunity was there,and ,in many cases,no chance of getting caught out.Speed if we know there isn't any radar around.
So opportunities always abound for wrongdoing,with or without exchanges,just that it has become a bit easier to break the law,and that is quite simply what it is.Breaking the law.
I wholeheartedly agree that the penalties are nowhere near severe enough,and the time it takes to bring a case to a hearing is totally farcical.
  Blame people,NOT the exchanges.
By:
bobbybocala
When: 04 Oct 12 14:31
The AW is where it is most prevalent.......low grade horses......running regularly.......trained ridden and in many cases owned by lowlife.......
By:
Aviboyd
When: 04 Oct 12 14:42
It is a certainty that Weaver and Harvey will have a good chuckle, mention 'cookie jars' and continue to say that any guilty verdict could be the making of Heffernan.  In other words treating ATR viewers with the usual contempt and sticking up for 'a good lad who've they've shared a beer with'...
By:
Aviboyd
When: 04 Oct 12 14:48
unbiased - surely the existence of exchanges has made it 'a bit easier to break the law' - so in effect are largely responsible for what many suspect is rife corruption since their inception...
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 04 Oct 12 14:57
I used to say blaming exchanges is liking blaming airlines for terrorism but let's face it, the exchange interface effectively allows THEM to monopolise trading on their horses. If 10,000 people wanted £100 @ 2.0 on heads and 10,000 people wanted to lay heads for £100 @ 2.0 then if someone (who was able to manipulate the coin) offered heads for a million at 2.1 betfair would accomodate them at the expense of the 10,000 customers who were only laying at 2.0.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 04 Oct 12 14:57
*like (not liking)
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com