There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
fontwell and curragh were only about 2 seconds behind ATR here . usually live video is 3.5 - 4.5 seconds ahead
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 49
|
By:
I eventually got a fraction over 3s ahead at fonters, but no sign of the 4+ we have been getting....
|
|
By:
Maybe better to slow it down for them rather than keep cutting out 2 to go?
2 to go to obvious and many clicking on |
|
By:
York fine (same as RUK as usual).
|
|
By:
Yep Lamott, same thing happened when ATR behind the red button was same speed as SIS. They soon put an end to that
|
|
By:
Around 3.4 secs here.
|
|
By:
deffo 1.5 secs behind sis at fonters
|
|
By:
It's a second behind at the curragh. Have had it to .2 of a second before. Definitely slower
|
|
By:
Behind SIS that is
|
|
By:
stop complaining , its only a fiver a race
 |
|
By:
At the risk of adding further fuel to the conspiracy fire, why is the relative speed to RUK unaffected?
|
|
By:
Because SIS charge 8k a year ?
|
|
By:
duffy 06 Sep 12 17:47
If they were intent on sabotage they'd slow the pics down on the lv feed . This is one conspiracy theory i definitely subscribe too, in truth i am surprised it hasn't happened sooner.....have to monitor it closely. |
|
By:
Fontwell is near a second behind SIS. As said previously used to get live video to near .2 of a second behind so there has been a definite increase in Live video speeds lately.
It could be however that SIS have speeded up a tad lately since some tracks went fibre optic. |
|
By:
That wouldn't explain the difference between LV and ATR contracting though.
|
|
By:
Back to 4s at Newcastle....
|
|
By:
yep , seems better than yesterday
|
|
By:
Was fine yesterday as it is today. Sure it's not your PC rcing?
|
|
By:
bilbo , the speed of the pictures were slower yesterday , the reliability was good .
pc is fine here |
|
By:
Rcing is correct.
|
|
By:
I thought it was behind yesterday tbh, the speed is better today although , the general quality is a tad spluttery i think.
|
|
By:
It was definitely a bit slower yesterday. It seems fine today touch wood.
|
|
By:
it was also slow at stratford on saturday could only get it to 3s ahead of atr despite reloading numerous times during race
NA looks ok today |
|
By:
gone slower here now.....approx 2.5sec infront atr
|
|
By:
 gone |
|
By:
Just lost Bath, did this happen to aynone else?
|
|
By:
Yes
|
|
By:
If they do not provide the service, maybe we should all demand our money back?
|
|
By:
lost bath also - come back on again 5strides past the winning line - handy!
|
|
By:
yes...then came back after they had crossed the line..
|
|
By:
Sorry, I put my chair down on the cable.
|
|
By:
ttt
|
|
By:
I reckon it's slowed down again today.
|
|
By:
without a doubt slower
1 sec ? they do not want us to make money and they will do anything |
|
By:
galway was ok tbh but uttox and donny are slower and with the odd stutter thrown in to take a few more fractions off which only levels out when you're down to a couple of secs, it ain't good.
|
|
By:
so we've had no loss of pics today and in fact it's been a little better this week
but they couldn't have that , so lop a second or so off the speed always something in place to fk it up what's interesting is nobody knows why it cuts out during a race but the supplier has seen fit to put an extra delay in smells |
|
By:
Cutting out 2 furlongs out every other race was far too obvious,better to just gradually slow the feed hoping people are non the wiser.
|
|
By:
we never used to get the cut out
before that it was the ridiculously obvious pausing to bring it back to ATR speeds |
|
By:
abt a seconds diff with ATR come the finish at uttox.
woe |
|
By:
Ok guys - posted earlier in the thread that I thought you were mistakes but have taken my own readings today and completely agree with you -it's about a second bloody slower that it has been and should be which can only be deliberate.
|