Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
anyone
Show More
Try making your own selections by buying the paper,and putting some effort into getting a winner instead of following like blind sheep lol!
Dont think thats his game ,just after the mug money , arbing 
Suppose few quid a day profit is better than nought, i prefer to make money by working and putting time into selections.
Anyway good luck with with back/lays for today.
Anyway good luck with with back/lays for today.
Good price Con good luck mate, finishing my 12 hr shift now thank god,pick up my post on way home maybe ant may have found out pricewise selections time i get home will check.
Conditor .. Raul the man is on board. 33's and i'll have a tenner each way of that. Does jimbo still own the beast?
Noble Citizen Ascot 3.55 25s with Bolyes (allegedly) 22/1 Lads
Al Muheer 3.55 Ascot 20s with Boyles (allegedly) 18/1 generally
Dunaden 4.35 Ascot 8/1 Corals
Good luck and have a good Saturday.
Al Muheer 3.55 Ascot 20s with Boyles (allegedly) 18/1 generally
Dunaden 4.35 Ascot 8/1 Corals
Good luck and have a good Saturday.
noble citizen 3.55 ascot 25/1 spoilsports 22/1 badcrooks 20/1 the rest
al muheer 3. 55 ascot 20/1 spoil 18/1 billy
dunaden 4.35 ascot 8/1 £10 joe.7/1 375 boar paddy billy
good luck
al muheer 3. 55 ascot 20/1 spoil 18/1 billy
dunaden 4.35 ascot 8/1 £10 joe.7/1 375 boar paddy billy
good luck
Hi -pricewise's main selection in the 3:55 is noble citizen as he says in his article have a few quid on al muheer
Good Luck
Good Luck
Dunaden 11-2 from 7s with billies by 9 last nite
This is the idea of the column...
This is the idea of the column...
no good me phoening spoils for best prices, just had letter on thurs informing me i wont get pricewise selections
, any special offers, no guarantee odds, and no fon a bet anymore, it seems that i participated in an offer at punchestown when they were offering ,HAVE A BET ON THIS 35 RUNNER HCAP AND WELL MATCH YOUR STAKE UP TO 50 QUID ON THE EURO 2012 OUTRIGHT. i did this, now having reviewed my acct it seems im a big liability to the firm . this after a few days of been closed down by powers ,CAN I HAVE A BET ANTE POST ON DANEDREWM PLEASE 10/1 KING GEORGE, ANSWER WAS , YOU CANT HAVE ANY BET ON THIS RACE .
, any special offers, no guarantee odds, and no fon a bet anymore, it seems that i participated in an offer at punchestown when they were offering ,HAVE A BET ON THIS 35 RUNNER HCAP AND WELL MATCH YOUR STAKE UP TO 50 QUID ON THE EURO 2012 OUTRIGHT. i did this, now having reviewed my acct it seems im a big liability to the firm . this after a few days of been closed down by powers ,CAN I HAVE A BET ANTE POST ON DANEDREWM PLEASE 10/1 KING GEORGE, ANSWER WAS , YOU CANT HAVE ANY BET ON THIS RACE .
elisjohn .you know the rules
you are not allowed to win
ALL bookies the same
all got overheads
no winners allowed
should be in thier adverts
you are not allowed to win
ALL bookies the same
all got overheads
no winners allowed
should be in thier adverts
Ladbrokes £10 max on noble citizen @ 22/1
Will just take the 20's
Will just take the 20's
Ladbrokes £10 max on noble citizen @ 22/1
In the recent 'Sir Tom' Twitter PR drive, the Racing Post official Twitterer said that the column is meant for £10 or £20 punters.
This is the perfect outcome for the RP and its bookmaker business partners/owners - the value gets redistributed from the shrewd to the clueless, and the bookmakers are very happy thank you to take bets only from those they know are going to lose any winnings back to them in the end...
In the recent 'Sir Tom' Twitter PR drive, the Racing Post official Twitterer said that the column is meant for £10 or £20 punters.
This is the perfect outcome for the RP and its bookmaker business partners/owners - the value gets redistributed from the shrewd to the clueless, and the bookmakers are very happy thank you to take bets only from those they know are going to lose any winnings back to them in the end...
badcrooks same as £10 joe
we lay any bet to lose 10 grand but only for pianos
we lay any bet to lose 10 grand but only for pianos
Millhouse has been so on the money regarding Pricewise for years , whilst i was getting my bets on i doubted him , but i am not now and neither is anyone bar the £10 brigade , so hats off to millhouse i can now see were you were coming from all those years ago.
elisjohn
21 Jul 12 08:00 Joined: 15 Jun 03 | Topic/replies: 6,979 | Blogger: elisjohn's blog
no good me phoening spoils for best prices, just had letter on thurs informing me i wont get pricewise selections, any special offers, no guarantee odds, and no fon a bet anymore, it seems that i participated in an offer at punchestown when they were offering ,HAVE A BET ON THIS 35 RUNNER HCAP AND WELL MATCH YOUR STAKE UP TO 50 QUID ON THE EURO 2012 OUTRIGHT. i did this, now having reviewed my acct it seems im a big liability to the firm . this after a few days of been closed down by powers ,CAN I HAVE A BET ANTE POST ON DANEDREWM PLEASE 10/1 KING GEORGE, ANSWER WAS , YOU CANT HAVE ANY BET ON THIS RACE .
Check out where both of these firms are based not 500 yards from each other.Surely there cannot be any swapping of client information...Their staff must meet in a social environment....
21 Jul 12 08:00 Joined: 15 Jun 03 | Topic/replies: 6,979 | Blogger: elisjohn's blog
no good me phoening spoils for best prices, just had letter on thurs informing me i wont get pricewise selections, any special offers, no guarantee odds, and no fon a bet anymore, it seems that i participated in an offer at punchestown when they were offering ,HAVE A BET ON THIS 35 RUNNER HCAP AND WELL MATCH YOUR STAKE UP TO 50 QUID ON THE EURO 2012 OUTRIGHT. i did this, now having reviewed my acct it seems im a big liability to the firm . this after a few days of been closed down by powers ,CAN I HAVE A BET ANTE POST ON DANEDREWM PLEASE 10/1 KING GEORGE, ANSWER WAS , YOU CANT HAVE ANY BET ON THIS RACE .
Check out where both of these firms are based not 500 yards from each other.Surely there cannot be any swapping of client information...Their staff must meet in a social environment....
Willies shows them accountants at Joes who can hold the price the longest. Well done.
This is the perfect outcome for the RP and its bookmaker business partners/owners - the value gets redistributed from the shrewd to the clueless, and the bookmakers are very happy thank you to take bets only from those they know are going to lose any winnings back to them in the end...
Why this assumption - it purveys throughout gambling - that all big punters are shrewd and all £10 punters are mugs? The biggest mugs I've known are those that bet big, have the odd win, large it up when that happens, carry on betting big to appear they know wheat they are doing (and love to tell people about it) but don't end up 'winning' any more than smaller punters and when they lose the lose a lot more.
The assumption that big staking punters are shrewd has kept bookies in clover for years and years. With gambling it aint what you put in but what you take out that matters!
Why this assumption - it purveys throughout gambling - that all big punters are shrewd and all £10 punters are mugs? The biggest mugs I've known are those that bet big, have the odd win, large it up when that happens, carry on betting big to appear they know wheat they are doing (and love to tell people about it) but don't end up 'winning' any more than smaller punters and when they lose the lose a lot more.
The assumption that big staking punters are shrewd has kept bookies in clover for years and years. With gambling it aint what you put in but what you take out that matters!
The £10 max(available for minutes)is only available to ordinary losing punters.On account,any punter who does not bet in the only way bookmakers now allow i.e never look for value and bet like a mug,will not be allowed to bet on Pricewise or anything else.In the shops bookmakers have made it pointless to make the trip by only allowing £10 or £25 max on Pricewise (and are quickly turning cash into loser only also).So ordinary punters who bet in the way that is the whole point of having the column i.e. are price..wise can't bet.The prices are in effect only available to punters who are price..stupid.The Post has allowed(or worked with its bosses)the column to be turned full circle and become part of the bookmakers loser only scam working against their readers not for them.
PS big staking losing punters will be allowed to bet far more.Most of these mug punters probably do not have the patience and discipline,give up after one long losing run and miss the winner so also lose on Pricewise.
The racing media ofcourse are rewarded for services rendered by being allowed to bet to bet on Pricewise or anything else.They are like those little fish that attach themselves to big fish and feed on their sh ite.
The racing media ofcourse are rewarded for services rendered by being allowed to bet to bet on Pricewise or anything else.They are like those little fish that attach themselves to big fish and feed on their sh ite.
The Racing Post Pricewise tub thumping, when the only possible endgame for anyone who backs the selections and wins is account closure/restriction, is truly obscene, imo...
toronto - most punters are happy to back a winner at any have decent odds ,so your logic dosent stack up,if they miss 10/1 can still get 8/1 ,also £ to £25 is the majority of peoples saturday staking plan ,the people who no doubt pay your salary (if you work in the industry).
what are they meant to do stand there giving out 100/1 all day to any amount of money,which would close them down ,which would close racing down ,then this forum,
then you d no doubt be moaning that pricewise closed racing down and the column was a waste of space.
what are they meant to do stand there giving out 100/1 all day to any amount of money,which would close them down ,which would close racing down ,then this forum,
then you d no doubt be moaning that pricewise closed racing down and the column was a waste of space.
most punters are happy to back a winner...if they miss 10/1 can still get 8/1
100% the idea of the column, as far as the RP and its bookmaker owners/business partners are concerned...
100% the idea of the column, as far as the RP and its bookmaker owners/business partners are concerned...
if shops put a sale on a popular item - they run out ,same principle.
CHill
Just because your customer is not shrewd does not mean you should be allowed to scam him.Would it be ok if you bought a savings plan that was advertising 3% interest but instead you were offered 2% when you filled in the application form.Your argument is exactly the way bookmakers now act."Its OK to scam punters because they are stupid and we have the media in our back pocket so we can get away with it".Anyway why do you think a punter would be ok with picking up 225 when it was advertised he would pick up 275.
Yet again,no one is saying bookmakers should lay huge amounts on popular horses.Just as they used to,when they were still making large profits,reasonable bets.They are not laying anything on account unless you are a long term proven loser and in the shops not worth the hassle and petrol to get 10 or 25 on in the few minutes they lay it.So far from having huge liabilities,they only lay tiny amounts to proven losers.
What is the bigger picture is not just them manipulating price wise to be a tool for them but the fact that they are now getting away with a loser only policy.
Bookmakers have operated for years before the fobts by being bookmakers and would in the future.By taking bets and making a book they would make far more money than driving all their mid range punters to here .
Just because your customer is not shrewd does not mean you should be allowed to scam him.Would it be ok if you bought a savings plan that was advertising 3% interest but instead you were offered 2% when you filled in the application form.Your argument is exactly the way bookmakers now act."Its OK to scam punters because they are stupid and we have the media in our back pocket so we can get away with it".Anyway why do you think a punter would be ok with picking up 225 when it was advertised he would pick up 275.
Yet again,no one is saying bookmakers should lay huge amounts on popular horses.Just as they used to,when they were still making large profits,reasonable bets.They are not laying anything on account unless you are a long term proven loser and in the shops not worth the hassle and petrol to get 10 or 25 on in the few minutes they lay it.So far from having huge liabilities,they only lay tiny amounts to proven losers.
What is the bigger picture is not just them manipulating price wise to be a tool for them but the fact that they are now getting away with a loser only policy.
Bookmakers have operated for years before the fobts by being bookmakers and would in the future.By taking bets and making a book they would make far more money than driving all their mid range punters to here .
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539