I had £100 each way three grands 8/1 with spoilsports earlier today 1/5 the odds first 3
RULE 4: Birdie Queen was withdrawn. Price at time of withdrawal 12/1. Rule 4 applies to all bets - deduction 5p in the pound.
The above was taken from the RP site
Yet spoilsports have only paid £1,064 instead of £1,112 which i believe should be the returns. Having just spoken to someone on the live chat they are claiming a 10p rule 4 is correct.
You may have heard about Rule 4 c deductions. What are they?
1/9 or shorter - 90p
2/11 to 2/17 - 85p
1/4 to 1/5 - 80p
3/10 to 2/7 75%
2/5 to 1/3 - 70p
8/15 to 4/9 - 65p
8/13 to 4/7 - 60p
4/5 to 4/6 - 55p
20/21 to 5/6 - 50p
Evens to 6/5 - 45p
5/4 to 6/4 - 40p
13/8 to 7/4 - 35p
15/8 to 9/4 - 30p
5/2 to 3/1 - 25p
10/3 to 4/1 - 20p
9/2 to 11/2 - 15p
6/1 to 9/1 - 10p
10/1 to 14/1 - 5p
over 14/1 No deduction
Tattersalls Rule 4(c) You may have heard about Rule 4 c deductions. What are they?1/9 or shorter - 90p2/11 to 2/17 - 85p1/4 to 1/5 - 80p3/10 to 2/7 75% 2/5 to 1/3 - 70p 8/15 to 4/9 - 65p 8/13 to 4/7 - 60p 4/5 to 4/6 - 55p 20/21 to 5/6 - 50p Evens to
23 Apr 2012 15:42 24/25 Windsor 17:25 - Outright Betting Threes Grand e/w Single 8/1 50.00 266.00 Won Won 23 Apr 2012 15:41 23/24 Windsor 17:25 - Outright Betting Threes Grand e/w Single 8/1 150.00 798.00 Won Won
23 Apr 2012 15:42 24/25 Windsor 17:25 - Outright Betting Threes Grand e/w Single 8/1 50.00 266.00 Won Won23 Apr 2012 15:41 23/24 Windsor 17:25 - Outright Betting Threes Grand e/w Single 8/
this has cropped up on many occasions & unless it's a genuine error the only explanation is.........
Company software can differ from applying an amendment when a horse is withdrawn as opposed to applying when the bet was placed. The withdrawn horse on the shows went 17/2-9/1-10/1-11/1-12/1
Don't know when your bet was placed but my guess is it was when the withdrawn horse was showing 17/2 or 9/1 or earlier in the day when it was showing under 10/1 in their EP book , not saying it's correct or not but the variation from company to company does exist & it'll work for you when the horse retracts in price and against you when the horse drifts , as is the case in question.
Well done on the winner anyway
this has cropped up on many occasions & unless it's a genuine error the only explanation is.........Company software can differ from applying an amendment when a horse is withdrawn as opposed to applying when the bet was placed.The withdrawn horse on
Thanks for that Hayden, i placed my bets at 3.41 and 3.42 so that will explain it! Ill still have another bash at em in the morning as they told me there horse traders arent in now!
Thanks for that Hayden, i placed my bets at 3.41 and 3.42 so that will explain it! Ill still have another bash at em in the morning as they told me there horse traders arent in now!
You could have the same bet tomorrow but the withdrawn horse shrinks from 12/1 ( when you place your bet ) in to 9/1 which at SP applies to all bets..
In that example the general R4 would be 10p but you'd only be liable for 5p as it was 12/1 when your bet was placed.
Good luck with them tomorrow
Look at it from the reverse angle mailroad...You could have the same bet tomorrow but the withdrawn horse shrinks from 12/1 ( when you place your bet ) in to 9/1 which at SP applies to all bets..In that example the general R4 would be 10p but you'd o
If you're ahead with them, accept it, kicking up a fuss will just draw attention to yourself and the account will be closed sooner.
If you're down, they will want to keep you. Suggest they check the official result: "Price at time of withdrawal 12/1..... deduction 5p in the pound". All bookmakers are governed by this. IBAS would find in your favour.
Two options:If you're ahead with them, accept it, kicking up a fuss will just draw attention to yourself and the account will be closed sooner.If you're down, they will want to keep you. Suggest they check the official result: "Price at time of withd
Had exactly the same argument in a Laddies shop this morning. Had £100 @ 10/1 the same horse in the morning and was offered a grand at the payout counter rather than £1,050.
I was referred to a screen which claimed the price was 7/1 at the time of withdrawal and that was the end of the matter.
At the very least this sort of case, where a horse is withdrawn for refusing to enter the stalls, is open to abuse by bookmakers. On the other hand, Rule 4 usually works so much in the punters' favour that you don't really want to tarnish it with any sort of controversy. Plus, with shops being the only place I can any longer have a bet with a bookmaker, and the Laddies shop in question offering BOG up top £100 win or £50 ew, I'd rather not draw attention to the fact I've backed an unraced 2yo winner.
If you're lucky enough still to be allowed to take a price with S****, I'd grin and bear it, if I were you.
Had exactly the same argument in a Laddies shop this morning. Had £100 @ 10/1 the same horse in the morning and was offered a grand at the payout counter rather than £1,050.I was referred to a screen which claimed the price was 7/1 at the time of w
Delta, are you saying that because the OP placed his bet at an early price, the board prices subsequently offered are irrelevant in determining the rule 4?
Sound advice screaming.Delta, are you saying that because the OP placed his bet at an early price, the board prices subsequently offered are irrelevant in determining the rule 4?
Its a new account (only opened saturday morning) ive decided to leave it and just get on with the punting until they shut me down! thanks for the help
good luck boys
Its a new account (only opened saturday morning) ive decided to leave it and just get on with the punting until they shut me down! thanks for the helpgood luck boys