typical, according to full race result on sporting life the full result shows the fav came stone last, why the hell did the commentator state he pulled up after approx 5 bloody fences therefore!
typical, according to full race result on sporting life the full result shows the fav came stone last, why the hell did the commentator state he pulled up after approx 5 bloody fences therefore!
PU Raphiell (IRE) 3/1J 8 11-6 Robin Dickin 94 * * Charlie Poste
Soon pushed along in rear, mistake 7th, behind and driven along 8th, tailed off when pulled up before 11th (op 11-4)
he did pull up mooeny back it is - void bet PU Raphiell (IRE) 3/1J 8 11-6 Robin Dickin 94 * * Charlie Poste Soon pushed along in rear, mistake 7th, behind and driven along 8th, tailed off when pulled up
I can definately see what you are saying, if that was a gentlemans agreement down the pub you would have been paid out, but dealing with betting firms neither horse finished if your horse had finished the course even if it was walking, you would have been or should have been paid out, I've had that more than once I can tell you, and it is not how things panned out in the race, it's if they finished the complete course... not my rules you understand, or my idea of how it should be, but this is how I was dealt with in same circumstances...... if neither complete I agree it should be void.... GL
I can definately see what you are saying, if that was a gentlemans agreement down the pub you would have been paid out, but dealing with betting firms neither horse finished if your horse had finished the course even if it was walking, you would have