Forums
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
ghostwriter11
11 Mar 12 08:13
Joined:
Date Joined: 28 Jan 12
| Topic/replies: 83 | Blogger: ghostwriter11's blog
Why is it  fraudulent for an owner /trainer to lay his own horse to lose ? Yet not fraudulent for them to back another horse in the same race to win ? What's the difference ?
Pause Switch to Standard View Owners / Trainers - Laying their own...
Show More
Loading...
Report ghostwriter11 March 11, 2012 7:24 AM GMT
Ok simple equation 4 horse race all trading @4 owner backs the all horses except his own - in reality lays his own horse @4- Why is that acceptable ?
Report ghostwriter11 March 11, 2012 7:28 AM GMT
Ok next observation - If its fraud to lay your own horse to loase is it ok to back all the others with a bookmaker ?
Report frog2 March 11, 2012 7:45 AM GMT
Not all bookmakers have MOU with the HRA and those that do are not as open as Betfair. Also they all untraceable cash betting. So it would be unenforceable.
Report ghostwriter11 March 11, 2012 9:07 AM GMT
Frog my point is to ban people who lay their own horses to lose and not those backing others to win is plain stupid
Report ghostwriter11 March 11, 2012 9:09 AM GMT
When those who make rules don't think them through (like the whip rule ) it ends up in a mess.
Report Stake & Chips March 11, 2012 9:13 AM GMT
It's amazing that no one has spotted this before,ghostwriter11!?
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com