There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Why is it fraudulent for an owner /trainer to lay his own horse to lose ? Yet not fraudulent for them to back another horse in the same race to win ? What's the difference ?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 6
|
By:
Ok simple equation 4 horse race all trading @4 owner backs the all horses except his own - in reality lays his own horse @4- Why is that acceptable ?
|
|
By:
Ok next observation - If its fraud to lay your own horse to loase is it ok to back all the others with a bookmaker ?
|
|
By:
Not all bookmakers have MOU with the HRA and those that do are not as open as Betfair. Also they all untraceable cash betting. So it would be unenforceable.
|
|
By:
Frog my point is to ban people who lay their own horses to lose and not those backing others to win is plain stupid
|
|
By:
When those who make rules don't think them through (like the whip rule ) it ends up in a mess.
|
|
By:
It's amazing that no one has spotted this before,ghostwriter11!?
|