There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Had a £20 treble with ladbrokes on 3 unnamed
favourites first two won unfortunately marked my slip on last leg as 3.25F as meant 3.25N (Naas) only one 3.25 will I be settled on the 3.25 at naas wininng fac at 2/1 thanks in advance
favourites first two won unfortunately marked my slip on last leg as 3.25F as meant 3.25N (Naas) only one 3.25 will I be settled on the 3.25 at naas wininng fac at 2/1 thanks in advance
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 27
|
By:
sorry meant winning fav not fav
|
|
By:
I'm sure they will be able find a 3-25 F -
- somewhere in the World - to stuff you. Is there a Cartoon Racing track, beginning with an 'F' - for starters?   |
|
By:
any concrete views
|
|
By:
void bet money returned , had it myself with a dog bet ,
|
|
By:
you'll be ok
|
|
By:
OK
|
|
By:
thanks mange etc so seems ill get paid on three winners will let you know how i go thanks for your advice
|
|
By:
have just been told poss wont get paid can anybody confirm or not
|
|
By:
shirley they will try to dodge it
 You need to get some advice ..... |
|
By:
would imagine last leg is void, as you can't expect the bookie to assume you wrote the single letter abbreviation incorrectly.
Just as likely that you put the time down incorrectly? |
|
By:
pedrobob yeah that's a fair point ..... settle as a double the likeliest solution ....
|
|
By:
Right guys,have just downloaded ladbrokes SHOP rules.
Rule [e] error regarding the meeting or race time [i] TIME OF THE SELECTION STATED BUT NO MEETING........ all selections in the multiple will stand for the meeting which does have a race at that time So go forth and collect your winning treble with confidence. |
|
By:
that's the logic i thought last night
time has always been the deciding factor, unless clashing races of course. |
|
By:
that rule dont apply here, that says
TIME OF THE SELECTION STATED BUT NO MEETING there was a meeting stated as in F |
|
By:
you will be fine....just checked the archive, no duplicate meetings at scotsville or the german meeting yeaterday....1.01 to collect a treble
|
|
By:
i'd be a heavy layer at 1.01 tbh
|
|
By:
i must admit when i read this last night i didn't notice that F was an actual meeting that day (fontwell), you'd still like to think that goodwill would prevail but i'd have real concerns that it may not.
|
|
By:
very worse case scenario, split stake with one if the fontwell races and the 3.25
|
|
By:
OPshould definitely be paid full winnings on treble as having looked again rule[v] states that if a meeting is stated but inncorrect time then selection will gonto a meeting with that time.
so the bet can be settled as treble using either of the rules i have stated. i suspect that 1234 maybe you got confused with fairyhouse being a recent irish meeting. anyway don't settle for anything less than full payment. |
|
By:
i would just like to thank you all for your posts very much appreciated when i went to shop they said that bet had been settled as a loser but thanks to info on her argued the point and got paid many thanks 1234
|
|
By:
glad to hear it, was wondering earlier how you got on, fair play to the shop too.
 |
|
By:
ribot's information there very useful, they had to pay out armed with that knowledge.
|
|
By:
must admit went into a shop where i had not placed the bet (bargoed south wales) and the chap there most helpfull ladbrokes should consult the chap there called WILL on how to improce customer relations
|
|
By:
must admit went into a shop where i had not placed the bet (bargoed south wales) and the chap there most helpfull ladbrokes should consult the chap there called WILL on how to improce customer relations
|
|
By:
RESULT
 |
|
By:
Thank you striding.
Knowledge,especially in gambling,is power. Althogh any one could have done it had they gone to ladbroke's site and down loaded their shop rules. |
|
By:
Pity ladcrooke's staff can't look at and interprete their own rules.
Why am i not surprised though. |