Ok not everyone will blame them but they will be the ones who refused to compromise without an alternative solution. Obviously I bet as im logged into a gambling site. The other questions a bit too ridiculous to answer.

What about the clown on page 6 of the RP, he just confirmed what said about juranalists, tyring to make a name for themselfs, saying something so rediculous, he should be laughted off the Paper, and join the Murdoch now defuncked sunday beano.

How many rides did Rooby have, before he decided he decided that he couldn't ride under the new rules?

Arklearkle, I understood that the PJA commitee thing were happy with the open negotiations with the BHA and the PJA/jocks had recommended to scrap the final furlong lunacy and restrict punishments to bans rather than money. Both of which they got. But since then jocks are still getting on their high horses though?

I know in reality it wasn't a 'compromise' because the first set of rules were so wrong that they never would have worked anyway but by backing down a little the BHA seem to have bought themselves a month.

So what do you think will happen next month? Jockeys accept the current rules? Demand to go back to the old rules? Propose new rules?