Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Feck N. Eejit
16 Oct 11 14:18
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Jan 02
| Topic/replies: 8,841 | Blogger: Feck N. Eejit's blog
Second was struck about 11 times inside the final furlong, including twice when clearly held and clear of the 3rd. Is that acceptable?

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 6
By:
stopper
When: 16 Oct 11 14:19
only in the rest of the world
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 16 Oct 11 14:23
Don't you mean only in the rest of the racing world?
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 16 Oct 11 14:33
Nothing more than love taps - and nothing compared to Spencer on Cape Blanco.

This is where the discretion of the stewards should come in - most of us agree some whippings deserve a ban - like the one Spencer handed out to Cape Blanco.

For the Cape Blanco ride I would have banned Spencer for 7 consecutive grade / group 1 race days. For that ride in Ireland, a 1 day ban with a warning of a heavier ban the next time.
By:
GEORGE.B
When: 16 Oct 11 14:41
That is where they have got it wrong with bans for offences in big races, imo - the jockey should then be banned for future big race days, not days when there is only bread + butter stuff on.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 16 Oct 11 14:48
George, I agree about the penalties. It's also pointless banning someone for 15 days if they only have 1 mount a month. There will be a lot of opportunities coming up for such jockeys on gambled horses if the BHA don't act. I also think they should consider amending the result wrt prize money (i.e. not the betting result) where they think extra hits have affected the result.
By:
BobSievier
When: 16 Oct 11 15:02
Bans for Group races is an interesting idea .
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com