There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Given the long list of worthwhile things to protest about why the fuss about a perfactly sensible switch to representing odds in a language that is far more familiar to the general public
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 22
|
By:
Whats on your tipping line today laddie????
|
|
By:
.
Yes BUT an even money chance should be shown as 2.0, not 1.0. THEN there would be consistency with Betfair, and, more particularly, with the Tote. The latter is vital for new racegoers. B-) |
|
By:
what logical reason is there for keeping fractions
decimals so much easier to understand for noive/infrequent punters |
|
By:
Tradition, for which we are very fond of in this country, is often the enemy of progress.
|
|
By:
I don't think my clients would be too happy if spilled our bets out on here Zebadi
|
|
By:
euro next
|
|
By:
joshuag,they may get better prices if you did ;)
|
|
By:
.
|
|
By:
Fractions far more advantageous to bookies than punters.
|
|
By:
It's nt een 'proper' decimal odds!
|
|
By:
need to rid this keyboard of crumbs...
|
|
By:
Mcririck and the rails bookie on earlier couldn't even work out the decimal odds back to fractions so not sure it's any easier for public. certainly a pr disaster if done a different way to the tote and betfair.
|
|
By:
FFS racing, drag yourself into the 21st Century and stop making a fuss about every single change. You've hardly changed for 200 years and you wonder why you're in a sorry state. Get with the times or die.
|
|
By:
i can just see it , haydock on a summer saturday afternoon .jimmy and his mates on the pub trip have eleventeen pints of lager and then a tenner apiece on the fav at 2 , murders occur when they are paid £20 and not £30
|
|
By:
According to todays trial, decimal odds in use would be 3.0 = 3-1, 2.0 = 2-1, 1.0 = evens etc
|
|
By:
AT the moment every race is measured in Furlongs , wait till they change that to Meters . That will put the cat among the pigeons . If we joint Euro ,the furlongs will have to go .
|
|
By:
Is there anyone out there that is so f*cking stupid that they don't know what 11-8 is but understand immediately what 1.375 represents.
|
|
By:
the thing with decimal is its far easier for punters to work out what the bookies over round is. thats why they dont like it.
|
|
By:
If the said punter can't make out what 5/2 is how the f*ck is he going to work out an overround?
|
|
By:
Yes these "new punters" that are going to be attracted by this decimal nonsense will immediately be checking out the overround after having their first bet.
:^0 |
|
By:
deep, given that all the objections are coming from long established players, would your question not be better phrased as "Is there anyone out there that is so f*cking stupid that they don't know what 1.375 represents but understand immediately what 11/8 represents"?
|
|
By:
personally I couldn't care less because like most people on here I grew up with fractions and work daily with decimals ... I can see the point that telling someone that they are going to get 1.375 to 1 is may be clearer than telling someone that they will get 11 back for every 8 that they bet but I can't see it fundamentally affecting turnover. I can see there being a problem if the decimal odds that the bookies in Tatts are showing are different than the odds shown on the Tote because most new players usually start on the Tote and then make their way into the ring as they get more confident.
|