|
By:
never understood the point of these threads
you either get on with it and pay for it or you are too f ucking cheap to pay 20 quid and feel like you must tell the world that you wouldnt give the sweat off your balls to anyone |
|
By:
Exactly. No RUK, No Comment. Unless posters can prove that they pay for it they shouldnt be allowed to comment. It is after all a private channel ;)
|
|
By:
Worth the fee just to knock one out over Lydia's chebs.
|
|
By:
Great Whyte 26 Apr 21:39
FACT. RUK costs about the same as a barely decent bottle of win I would like to know what you pay for a decent bottle of wine!? |
|
By:
At 66p a day , a total bargain .
|
|
By:
Muqbil 27 Apr 15:19
Great Whyte 26 Apr 21:39 FACT. RUK costs about the same as a barely decent bottle of win I would like to know what you pay for a decent bottle of wine!? he pays 66p a day obviously |
|
By:
In the post he said barely decent.
|
|
By:
atr should charge ruk subscribers for their stupidity
|
|
By:
That should cost them a lot more than £20.00 per day
|
|
By:
Why, are you paying more than that for your stupidity, Telepathic?
|
|
By:
3735 - as a matter of proportion £200 per day would be cheap in your case.
|