|
By:
GOOD LUCK
|
|
By:
maybe roy and maybe not especially on big days,personally wish there were no new areas but there will obviously be more if the racecourses think they can sell them,dont blame anyone for going in them if they are there(wish i had last saturday),but just pointing out bookies aint going in them to give anything away so you could argue the racecourses are just as culpable by seeking a few extra quid in giving the paying public a raw deal.
|
|
By:
I bet on the Scottish National at Newbury. 1/4 Odds 1234. Sounds like the only place it was 1/5th 1234 was at Ayr itself!!!
Even at Newbury they all wanted to be on the winner, all rates from 20/1 down :( |
|
By:
1st race at Stratford today I had to go win only, which I dont like to do, especially on a Sunday. Even though there were 7 runners it was 1/7, 8/1, 50/1 bar. I was going to offer 1/4 odds 1-2 and adjust the win odds accordingly but the book next to me went 1/6th odds 1-2 & exploded the prices. What can you do?
|
|
By:
WASNOT..WOULD IMAGINE THE FIRST RACE WOULD BE A DISASTER FOR MOST OF THE BOOKS..
|
|
By:
40-1 & 16-1 winners made up for it am sure
|
|
By:
I managed to take £7 out of the favourite, and I dont lay on here :(
|
|
By:
RR - 40/1 came in to silence. 16/1 well backed in the ring (£200 EW laid next door to me).
|
|
By:
stratford still good ring wise then wassy?
|
|
By:
RR - we get on OK with Stratford, but we have some good midlands punters from our dogs days.
|
|
By:
We also dont fk them about with 1/6th odds and the like.
|
|
By:
yotally agree with all you say RIBERO.
will probably see less and less bookies when the courses charge premium rates on good days, which could lead to pick values depreciateing in value |
|
By:
roy certain pick numbers yes i.e the high numbers might have the effect of increasing the low numbers even more
|
|
By:
how many bookmakers do you think would turn up if it was £1000 per pick to bet at AINTREE on grand national day
|
|
By:
roy777 18 Apr 20:51
yotally agree with all you say RIBERO. will probably see less and less bookies when the courses charge premium rates on good days, which could lead to pick values depreciateing in value I think i see what you are driving at roy.. but surely if less books attend that would increase the value of the picks! |
|
By:
if the bookies start betting at 2% per runner this would give the punters a raw deal which could result in less punters attending the meetings, staying at home and using the exchanges
|
|
By:
The same logic doesnt stop them stiffing the caterers who then have to stiff the public with food & drink prices. Difference is that they have an alternative to betting with the bookmakers. They cant ring for a burger.
Big rents good for those in good picks only. Majority of bookmakers go out of business, course worse off overall, punters MUCH worse off. |
|
By:
Which bookies Roy?
If you added up the percentages available in the ring at Ayr on Sat.. or indeed on virtually ANY racecourse on any day the total would be WELL under 100% in the win book. In many place books it would be nearer 90%. The value for the punter is still very much on course. No commision, premium charge or repetitive strain syndrome. No £23 available at 36.00 when you wat a onner on! And fresh air and banter to booy! COME RACING! :) |
|
By:
roy:"this could result in less punters attending the track and staying at home using the exchanges"lol,where have you been for the last 6 or 7 years roy?seriously roy i realise what you are trying to say but i think both the stay at home punters will always stay at home and recegoers will continue to go racing,both having found their levels.
|
|
By:
How was Donny ribero1? Gave it a swerve as not getting on very well with it at the moment.
|
|
By:
we didnt go either wasnot although i understand tatts was ok,much better than last year,24 in tatts,9 on rails which was useless apparently.
|
|
By:
Last year was hopeless rib, hence the swerve this year. I'm going a week on friday for the Racing For Change effort, but going to swerve it on the Saturday again.
|
|
By:
cue 40 books in tatts in 2 weeks time in fairness to donny they seem to be trying re the admissions,£13 in tatts yesterday for a decent card,£10 on some friday afternoons,lets hope last night is the sign of things to come.
|
|
By:
so Ayr has made the main ring difficult to bet to? ah, so the solution pay their 750 pounds. perfect. GUTLESS lot. Boycott the place, then see how the track reacts. Apathy will throttle you long before the track does
|
|
By:
yes we took 3k last year,but as i say much better last night.
|
|
By:
Looked a fair crowd at Stratford in the middle wassy. I was too knackered after 8 hours in the car! :(
|
|
By:
11 books in the middle Paddy. I was not one of them.
|
|
By:
Must admit that the so called Scottish senior bookies who are trying to create a Scottish association to look after the Scottish books appear to be very shalolow and hypocrytical if you ask me.Only a couple of weeks ago they were downing tools and not attending Ayr racecourse due to the ring shifting towards the hospitality and new areas.These afore mentioned bookies were the first to pay the premier charge by the parade ring!!In some cases occupying two pitches??!Nice one lads!The word fickle and two faced comes to mind.Not only do they want to stop so called south of the border bookies venturing north,they also want to enlighten all other race courses that they can charge want they want on big race days and get the price they want.Nice one lads you cant beat sticking together!
|
|
By:
Place wasnt buzzing like it is in mid-summer Paddy. Also, dont think they'd have bet you the 7s on in the first out these LOL.
One fun idea they had was kids races on the track. Under 10s and over 10s. Really fun, except the sprint was too far for the under 10s & the winner of the over 10s would have given Linford Christie a race :^0 |
|
By:
Wassy.
My boys in training for this event but we are aiming at the under10s in 2017. He may have a few runs down the field in the preceding years. I do not want to overface him early on. |
|
By:
Must admit that the so called Scottish senior bookies who are trying to create a Scottish association to look after the Scottish books appear to be very shalolow and hypocrytical if you ask me.Only a couple of weeks ago they were downing tools and not attending Ayr racecourse due to the ring shifting towards the hospitality and new areas.These afore mentioned bookies were the first to pay the premier charge by the parade ring!!In some cases occupying two pitches??!Nice one lads!The word fickle and two faced comes to mind.Not only do they want to stop so called south of the border bookies venturing north,they also want to enlighten all other race courses that they can charge want they want on big race days and get the price they want.Nice one lads you cant beat sticking together!
we are poorly led |
|
By:
MrsPinno
Looked like a right result for you when big gal pulled down after the second! :) |
|
By:
we are not poorly led at all,kj and others are working incredibly hard for us all,they have absolutely no power to stop bookmakers acting independantly,sa i often agree with your comments although most are critical of bookies,dont know who you are but you are way off mark here imo.
|
|
By:
ribero. i fundamentally disagree. kj for example leads with 1/5 the odds on 16-21 runner handicaps. whatever the arguments for this, in his (and those alike) they ignore the constant complaints from our customers, and have introduced an unlevel playing field against leading books such as my own, who lay substantial bets at regular terms
It's certainly true to say it's often difficult to lead such a selfish group, but said leader and others who set themselves up as leaders, should be more vocal else they are so many sheep. we lack the strength at the top |
|
By:
we will have to agree to differ sa,kj works tremendously hard and we are lucky to have him,anyhow not really the place for this talk,good luck and goodnight all.
|
|
By:
kj for example leads with 1/5 the odds on 16-21 runner handicaps. whatever the arguments for this, in his (and those alike) they ignore the constant complaints from our customers
I do 1/5 odds in 16-22 runner h'caps & I do bigger odds than those who offer 1/4. I get zero complaints from my customers and my turnover is increasing. The only ones who bleat are the stay at home "punters" one here. I also have zero complaints about kj. If you knew the amount of work that goes on behind the scenes by kj, bj & rg you would get a shock. There are not many in this game you could trust with bookmakers livelihoods. I trust kj. |
|
By:
regarding ayr on saturday plenty of books bet 1st 4 1/4 on the national ,yet as ever this forum is lead to believe otherwise.
|
|
By:
I have found KJ to be the fairest man in the job i have seen.It is probably a labour of love but the main thing i have noticed with him is that he has all bookies interest at heart,opposed to certain so called committee members looking after there own a*rse.As a bookie with average numbers there is nothing worse in my view,with people who are supposed to be looking after the majority do things for there own ends meet.In my view KJ sees the overall picture and is endevouring to look after all bookies objectives.
|
|
By:
we agree to disagree lads, especially as it's apparent you offer a fifth on large field handicaps and the complaints of punters about the same hold little merit to you. Personally I see little future in blundering on with terms the public dislike- regardless of the argument that they are better off on the win book(and my win odds are no worse at a 1/4 than those betting to a 1/5). At the end of the day-only the bookies know how betfair prices a race up- and it's those same bookies hell**on taking every penny available to convey it on here that are the problem. I'll sign up to the initiative from RFC and we'll see how you match up then!
|
|
By:
as already stated theres plenty betting full place odds just have a look around.
|