|
By:
now 7s and tomorrow maybe 10s as predicted
4/1 ffs, what a joke |
|
By:
I must admit to being confused with this one. I must be the only person who thinks the horse will actually be better off on soft ground. The dam hasn’t had many top class horses but the other couple rated above 100 have excellent form on soft.
STS wasn’t ground dependant and some of his best progeny have absolutely excelled on soft ground. Harzand being a prime example. The extra emphasis on stamina will surely help too? Of course she may well not be good enough, but I just can’t understand why she was backed in as low as 3/1, but now some rain is forecast, she’s out to 13/2? Unless of course it’s something else and she just hasn’t travelled over particularly well? |
|
By:
Now, she's available at 7/1 probably due to her adverse draw, persistent support for Waldgeist and possibly the forecast of 8mm of rain tonight into tomorrow; 7/1 a price worth chancing given her proven ability and potential?
|
|
By:
Can't Catch Me
Date Joined: 02 Apr 03 Add contact | Send message 06 Oct 18 20:24 Joined: 02 Apr 03 | Topic/replies: 27,310 | Blogger: Can't Catch Me's blog I must admit to being confused with this one. I must be the only person who thinks the horse will actually be better off on soft ground. The dam hasn’t had many top class horses but the other couple rated above 100 have excellent form on soft. STS wasn’t ground dependant and some of his best progeny have absolutely excelled on soft ground. Harzand being a prime example. The extra emphasis on stamina will surely help too? Of course she may well not be good enough, but I just can’t understand why she was backed in as low as 3/1, but now some rain is forecast, she’s out to 13/2? Unless of course it’s something else and she just hasn’t travelled over particularly well? should never have been 4/1. nothing to do with travelling. |
|
By:
Lion King 29 Sep 18 21:27 Joined: 21 May 05 | Topic/replies: 163 | Blogger: Lion King's blog
Wow you could go bankrupt very quickly. She gets a lot of weight and has a good turn of foot. Won't be 5/1 on the day imho if no Cracksman. no she won't |
|
By:
That’s not really the point though Charlton.
|
|
By:
Paddy obviously know something. Can’t get her price out fast enough.
|
|
By:
ccm, isnt the point the "drift"?
the price was just wrong. thats why i made the thread, to point that out. why a few mugs are happy to take way under the odds, well this won't be the first time that's happened surely. ![]() |
|
By:
if cracksman was in the race, she would have ended 20/1 on the french pari
|
|
By:
Personally, I don’t think the drift is merely a ‘correction’.
|
|
By:
well i can tell you i don't have any knowledge of whats going on yet i predicted exactly this move, so for me it is a correction
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
better draw and it would have won!
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Lovely filly with a high cruising speed and turn of foot, unfortunately for connections she was beaten by the draw.
|
|
By:
All about the draw.
|
|
By:
Hope you will be reassessing your opinion of her now Charlton. Mighty run.
|
|
By:
indeed. i was totally wrong and lucky to still be in the game.
|
|
By:
takes a big man to step up and admit he was wrong. wd.
|
|
By:
Yes fair play Charlton. Thought she was definitely going to get there with a couple of hundred yards to go
Miraculous performance where you see where she was off the final bend. |