|
By:
Hadn't noticed that, Stevie. So much racing it's difficult to keep on top of scrutinizing all the poor stuff. I find that the RP times are usually the correct ones when there's a discrepancy, it's also the only site that states when hand times have been used. Just had a very quick look at the video and it looks to me that RP time is correct.
|
|
By:
cheers fig, I only noticed it because Simon rowlands gave the horse a much bigger speed figure than me in his sectional debrief and he was using 85.56 as well.
http://betting.betfair.com/horse-racing/timeform-debate/simon-rowlands/sectional-debrief-kempton-thursday-august-29-300813-43.html |
|
By:
Kempton one of my least favourite tracks.
|
|
By:
I've just done a hand time of 86.3 so I'll go with the RP time as well
|
|
By:
My ratings also point to the RP time being correct, the bunched finish wouldn't fit comfortably with ratings a second faster. I have Shafrah running below his debut form and Intermedium disappointing once again after a promising debut. The winner was well backed though and may be capable of better.
|
|
By:
anything to add sin ?
|