Forums

Horse Antepost

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
The Big O
26 Jul 12 04:36
Joined:
Date Joined: 05 Dec 06
| Topic/replies: 413 | Blogger: The Big O's blog
He is probably rubbish at boxing and therefore completely unproven as a sportsman..... Wink

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 4
By:
Desmond Orchard
When: 26 Jul 12 14:34
At the risk of sounding churlish (and I certainly 'get' where you're going with this one), I reckon Federer would be a brilliant boxer.
As one of the most outstanding athletes the world has ever seen, blending a potent mixture of  limitless stamina, speed, power, reaction time, footwork and hand-eye co-ordination, I think you would be hard pressed to find a none boxer more perfectly suited to the demands of that sport. Of course, he could have a glass jaw, but that didn't stop many from becoming a world champion and he doesn't lack for courage.
In fact, for the few historical figures who have achieved a level of greatness in any sport comparable to what Federer has acheived, it's almost certain that they would've 'made it' in almost any other sport, the talent transcends. Had it been their sole focus from an early age, I've little doubt that Don Bradman, Michael Jordan, Ed Moses etc etc could've won Wimbledon.
And yes, Frankel would gag up over 10-12F.
By:
The Big O
When: 27 Jul 12 04:15
Haha terrific post
By:
flyingbolt
When: 28 Jul 12 15:04
Frankel would never beat Federer at Wimbledon imo.
By:
The Big O
When: 30 Jul 12 03:29
I don't think Frankel would have been asked to step up to 5-set competition as yet.

Happy just to keep winning 3-set tournaments.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com