|
By:
Andrew in Sweden
10 Jun 12 05:18 Joined: 10 Nov 07 | Topic/replies: 1,501 | Blogger: Andrew in Sweden's blog i like henry as much as everyone else but he got frankels campaign wrong, So one of the best trainers of all time is wrong ..... and you're correct. I didn't realise this forum had posters of such high esteem. andrew, its just my opinion, henry is an all time great trainer, one of the best, esp of fillies, and frankel is one of the best milers ive ever seen but i dont think he got it right with frankel, yes hes unbeaten, hes been given poor rides and still won but i believe they have been too conservative with him. im not saying they should have run him in the derby, he prob wasnt ready, but its hard to argue that up until now the horse really hasnt been allowed show what he is truly capable of. there is no reason why he shouldnt have been stepped up after last years brilliant sussex performance and imo shouldve been stepped up before then. henry obv believes he will stay at least 10f now so i still dont get why he isnt running in the prince or wales. im just keeping this debate alive, i stick to what ive said and by no means do i think I could train any racehorse better than henry or anyone else for that matter but its a forum and we should be allowed express or views openly. i dont understand why frankel is still running over a mile, no idea, i wish i did but i dont, whats the point, he'll beat whatever lines up against him and will start 2/7. |
|
By:
jonibake
10 Jun 12 09:25 Joined: 18 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 323 | Blogger: jonibake's blog The problem with your earlier rant ILWAB is that your one reasonable arguement loses all credibility because of all the moronic tripe you posted with it. joni i dont know why YOU feel the need to abuse ME about what i post. i express my VALID view, but u dont seem to be able to see past frankel and will not accept ANY criticism of the horse or how hes been campaigned. and instead u come back from my well thought out posts with a post like this.. jonibake 09 Jun 12 21:36 Joined: 18 Nov 10 | Topic/replies: 323 | Blogger: jonibake's blog It can't be that clever a ploy of Henry's if you've worked it out ILWAB. why are u bothering to post that? i hear the argument about how frankel is a champ at 3 and the likes of sea the stars was retired after his 3 yr old season. the reason he was retired is because he won everything, he did it all, frankel is still on level 1 when sts won all the races at multiple distances including the guineas and derby and then the arc. do u honestly think we wouldve seen frankel had he won all the races sts won? get real. |
|
By:
join versatility IS the main characteristic that defines a champion. thats why people dont talk about dayjur in the same breath as they do nijinsky or dancing brave.
going up in distance is the whole point once you have achieved all there is at a particular distance. frankel hasnt achieved half of what sts has. the susses, sjp, queen eliz all over a mile against the same horse, u must be feckin joking. by the time frankel beat up excelebration for the3rd or 4th time in the queen liz, sts had dominated EVERY horse over all distances. to absolutely incomparable achievements. rock of Gibraltar couldve done what frankel did last year, but there isnt a horse since dancing brave that couldve done what sts did, perhaps camelot who imo has already achieved more imo than frankel winning both the guineas and derby, thats an incredible achievement, not beating excelebration again again and again. immortal verse is an average miler, nothing special, and dream ahead is a sprinter, and of course i give frankel credit for beating nathaniel and TB but as i mentioned, lets see him beat them over THEIR TRIPS and not HIS for bloody once. |
|
By:
I'm sorry ILWAB but I stand by what I say. Your post (not you) was moronic tripe for reasons I detailed. I am not going to get drawn into something with you because whatever i say will make little difference to you as whatever you say will certainly make no difference to me. I DONT think versatility is the main characteristic and I am quite prepared to accept criticism of the horse as I have twice posted that you have a perfectly valid point with his campaign. I agree with you on that. Please read that sentence this time.
Many people will always hold STS in higher regard and I understand that perfectly. Others like me will disagree. What I would never do is put down that great horse (STS) and it annoys me when you do that to Frankel. Good luck anyway. |
|
By:
The big problem with Frankel's campaign as I see it is that he could run in the Juddmonte and very little
could oppose him and the race could end up proving very little. Cecil could then aim the horse at the Champion stakes on say Good to soft ground with the likes of Cirus des and a top end Ballydoyle horse in the field and end up destroying them and finishing the race with plenty of energy. If this happened then the horse may well have been up to winning the best races 1 1/2m races, yet they've left it too late to realise this posiblity and wasted a lot of time by running Frankel against the same horses at a mile over and over and over again. If this happened then Cecil would be guilty of not allowing Frankel to show his versatility and as such the races he's run in don't do full justice to the horse. |
|
By:
I agree wholeheartedly Tinkler. I would have love to see him run in the Eclipse because if he were to win easily they could start thinking about races like the Arc. In an interview during the winter HRAC said Frankel would even get an entry in the King George as all options were open. They have certainly gone back on things they said over the winter. I just wonder if he has serious doubts about whether he actually will get a strongly run 10f.
This is a game of opinions and it is interesting to hear the likes of Kieron Fallon saying why bother stepping him up at all? He says why not just win a whole host of group 1's over a mile as he is so dominant. I am not saying I agree with that but everyone has their own views. |
|
By:
He may well not stay a fast run 1 1/4m especially at Ascot with some give under foot and I suppose it's
possible Cecil could by-pass the Champion and take in the QE2. If Frankel run's at York on fast ground with a small field he may not have his stamina put to the test but if he lines up in the Champion he almost certainly will. The Prix Jacque de Marois and Breeders Cup Mile would have been interesting races for Frankel to run in if they do a u-turn and decide not to go beyond a mile. |
|
By:
Like a lot of people I think Frankel would run away with the POW winning by four or five lengths ,so why not run him .The answer probably lies in Cecil not wanting to play the Frankel stamina Card before Camelot enters the fray ....if Camelot enters the fray at York . To do so would be to expose to the Coolmore team the limits of Frankels staying ability , which would come under acute post race scrutiny by the opposition ....was he going away at the finish or was he being hauled in ...when did he make his move , what tactics could be engineered to bring about his downfall and so on and so forth .The initiative would one way or another be with the Camelot Team ...but what can coolmore
do without such information ? They have excelebration to test against their champion , the plot thickens in lieu of the mighty showdown |
|
By:
Certainly have no problem with the way Frankel has been campaigned to now, though he has proven all there is to prove at a mile now, his talents are there for all to see.
It is time to step him up and prove himself the champ at 10. What better way to start than at Royal Ascot in what should be a good field. Take the Wales, the Eclipse, the International, the Irish Champ and then step up and beat a triple crown winner in the Arc... that would stamp him as the greatest... |
|
By:
The PoW would be an ideal time to test Frankel's stamina - if he doesn't stay or struggles to get the trip then that still leaves a mile programme for the rest of the season.
|
|
By:
Legendary status not yet certain
Taking on Frankel must be balanced against the danger of Camelot losing his record, says Ian McClean Like a climber reaching base camp, it is time to momentarily pause and reflect before looking ahead to the final summit. The ripple of Camelot's achievement in winning the Epsom Derby reached as far as the following day's New York Times where it trumped even I'll Have Another's Triple Crown bid for precious column space in a broadsheet not renowned for its racing coverage. The frailty of the thoroughbred and the transience of opportunity were sadly mirrored in that horse's 11th-hour withdrawal from the Belmont and the possibility of accomplishing a feat last achieved in the US by the mighty Affirmed in 1978. America will have to wait at least another year. It only serves to bring into even sharper focus Camelot's future and what it might entail. One thing is for certain -- with a CV beginning to match his christening and reputation (now unbeaten in four races including three Group Ones, two of them Classics) Camelot is big box-office. Between Friday evening and last Wednesday (after the extended UK Diamond Jubilee bank holiday), fuelled by the whiff of a Triple Crown, tickets for the premier enclosure at Doncaster sold out online. Two Camelot questions are being hotly debated: What has he accomplished so far and what should he do next? The hyperbole surrounding his Derby victory is not entirely reflected in the cold slide rule of the handicapper's rating -- falling short of Workforce, Authorized and even Aidan O'Brien's last winner, High Chaparral. In victory last Saturday, Camelot defeated the smallest field since 1907. At least half the field will struggle to win a Group race of any kind and his main market rival, Bonfire, floundered on the tricky Epsom contours. In four races Camelot has defeated a total of 34 rivals. Between them all, his victims have won just four races -- two of those on the all-weather. It is easy, seductive almost (and compulsive when it comes to the media) to dilute perspective. After all, Marcel Duchamp walked into a plumbing suppliers in New York in 1917, bought a urinal, signed it and called it art. That is not to say Camelot is not as 'magical' as connections have always claimed. Or that there isn't something sacred in the unblemished perfection of flawless accomplishment. Camelot has effectively reached base camp; to conquer Everest he needs to overcome his elders. When 'the boys at Coolmore' sit down at the table this week there are a number of options for Camelot. After all, he is currently favourite for the Irish Derby, King George, St Leger and the Arc -- and if they'd priced up Crufts or the 1,500m at the Olympics he'd be favourite for those as well. I'm certain the top two items on the agenda will read 'Triple Crown' and 'Frankel'. It was interesting to hear John Magnier say after the Derby when asked about the pursuit of a Triple Crown: "We're all so old but if you'd asked me 30 years ago I'd have looked the other way". But a lot has changed and Coolmore (and those who make it up) is a different beast now. Historically, winning a St Leger has been inimical to the reputation of a young stallion. However, Coolmore has migrated from a fledgling challenger brand back in the day to its position as world-leading brand today. Where it once followed, it now leads, and it could in that capacity single- handedly restore a creaky Leonard Cohen of a Leger back to cool high fashion. Another cheery conundrum to spice up the Camelot round-table is the accompanying squad of Group One horses presently in the yard and how to deploy them. Magnier, as a postscript to the Derby, also referred to the fact that the Ballydoyle operation is presently going through "a good patch". Yes, and I also hear Michelangelo did a spot of painting and decorating. Aidan O'Brien has already won seven Group Ones this year including all four UK Classics and one in Ireland. The world record number in a season is 25, held by Bobby Frankel. O'Brien's best total was 23 back in 2008. At this stage of that season he had won six. In the wings, the yard holds older horses of the calibre of So You Think, St Nicholas Abbey and Excelebration, all of whom operate in Camelot's range, not to mention Fame And Glory. So while Camelot is the headline act, his chosen targets will be calculated as part of an overall grander scheme. The Triple Crown might represent the very pinnacle of a three year-old's achievement, but Camelot v Frankel would be the ultimate Everest for racing. |
|
By:
Its quality threads like this that make the forum such avid reading,I marvel at the depth of knowledge of the subject matter and the thought processes of some posters. This is really a non-thread as the "clash" will never happen sport doesnt really exist its cash and ego that dictates this "clash wont happen".
Frankel is a wonderhorse we all know it but its not likely to be proved as there is no 3yo champion at a mile and he is unlikely to tackle anything more challanging than a soft 10F to take on before returning to a mile. Camelot is no wonderhorse but a horse that will (hopefully win the triple crown via the Curragh and retire undefeated,Coolmore know what they have and more importantly what they DONT have,in a very average 3yo crop so the "clash will never happen" very sad from a sporting POV but thats the economics of the times we live in. |
|
By:
What was unlikely before, is unimaginable after todays performance. I can't see how another 2f will inconvenience Frankel to the extent that he runs 10lb below his best, which is what would be required for any horse currently in training to challenge him.
|
|
By:
I am not sure Frankel achieved much more than he did before as Excelebration was possibly below his best. He beat the 4th placed horse (a 113 horse) by 25lbs easing up, so its probably another effort worth rating 140+. (ONLY 140+... AGAIN!!!)
If there was any prospect whatsoever of Camelot meeting Frankel, it just went down the pan. I remember Brigadier Gerard and Mill Reef and saw Shergar live at Ascot. I have seen the video of the great Sea Bird. I am certain Frankel is the best flat horse I have ever seen and possibly the best horse anyone alive today will ever see. The frightening thing is that he may be quite a bit better than we have yet seen. |
|
By:
Cryoftruth
I agree that Excelebration must have been a bit below his best but that was highly likely because he tried to keep pace with Frankel. On the clock the performance is every bit as impressive as the visual display, it looks huge, Frankel's fastest run yet and well above anything I've ever rated before. |
|
By:
I have to admit it was an astonishing performance and he simply did to Excelebration what he did to the Guineas field for daring to go with him - its that raw power that simply sets him apart.
That MUST prove though its time to step him up, and at least Cecil mentioned the Eclipse post-race |
|
By:
He will be even better over 10f and there has been some nice talk today about him possibly racing as a 5 yo
the prince may even want this to happen |
|
By:
I'm expecting So You Think to win the POW impressively tomorrow and iirc his last race in Europe is definitely going to be the Eclipse. I reckon Cecil will bypass the Eclipse (citing it's too close to Ascot perhaps) and wait for the only really top class older 10f horse to go back to Australia before he steps Frankel up (if he ever does).
The Juddmonte will then be the next possible race over 10f but again he could instead go for a cake walk in the Sussex. In the Juddmonte the only realistic half decent opposition would be St Nicholas Abbey (unless Carlton House proves much better than I think he will) though SNA seems better at 1m4f these days. The race we all really want to see is Frankel against Camelot over 10f+ in the Juddmonte. ![]() |
|
By:
uncle if he does go Sussex ( which unfortunately is still the most likely ), he will still go Juddmonte
|
|
By:
^ But the best older 10f horse around is So You Think (as just proven at Ascot
) and his last race here is going to be in the Eclipse before he goes off to Stud in Australia, so Frankel waiting for the Juddmonte means that unless Camelot runs he'll likely be a 1/10 shot at York which will tell us nothing new.Taking on So You Think at Sandown would be a proper test and could enable Frankel to run up a monster mark - but equally the stiff course and a high class opponent may see him beaten (or maybe scrpae home) which will then dent his lofty reputation. If they swerve the Eclipse then that tells me that connections fear the latter scenario. ![]() What would the betting be if they did meet at Sandwon - 4/11 Frankel, 5/2 So You Think? |
|
By:
uncle I agree, he should go eclipse but I think he'll wait for the Sussex and as you say step up to 10F at the Juddmonte.
However don't think he's scared of SYT - I think he'd murder him tbh. The only thing that gives me hope is as I said above he at least mentioned the eclipse post race, and then that he may run up to 4 times more this season |
|
By:
i cannot see anyway that Coolmore will risk Camelot being beaten/thrashed by Frankel
|
|
By:
Got a bad feeling its just going to be the Sussex and QEII this year then retirement.
Get the feeling Henry is more than content to keep pounding Excelebration and keep Frankel unbeaten. |
|
By:
He simply must go to the Eclipse.
I don't think there is any doubt that he would beat SYT but we want to see it. Nathaniel still holds the claim of having been closest to Frankel in a race and he will be there. Some substance to that race. The Sussex, if Frankel runs, could quite literally be Frankel vs his older brother and whichever horse opts to turn up and take the place money... It could actually dent Frankel's reputation by giving substance to the 'beating up on nothing' theory... |
|
By:
Dear God but if he doesn't race against a serious horse soon it will be the biggest waste in Flat racing history
|
|
By:
Agree Sussex likely to be a complete non-event. Must go to the Eclipse.
|
|
By:
Cecil said on Friday: "He seems fine, he went out yesterday for a trot and a walk and we'll feel our way. I'd say at the moment it's more likely he'll go to Goodwood and to York."
........ So that's a line through the Eclipse. Anyone want to bet he doesnt show up at York either? |
|
By:
ELG I share your frustration but I'm sure he will be at York
|
|
By:
The most annoying thing is that now that he has flagged York he has given everyone else plenty of time to set their horses on different paths....
Irish Champion will be strong this year! |
|
By:
These are a poor bunch of 3 yo's that Camelot has dominated worse than Sea The Stars faced, of course Ballydoyle want their horse mentioning in the same breath as an all time great in Frankel for stud purposes to try and elevate Camelot above Sea The Stars.
The only reason they arent laughed out of town is because of Cecil's pitiful lack of ambition with Frankel who would be Champion from 1m to 1m4f if given the chance. His Royal Lodge performance showed he would have easily got 1m2f as a 2yo and I believe he could have won the Derby. I can understand those who think not as it would take a freak to win like a sprinter one day then go away from them over a trip the next, however this horse is a freak but we arent being allowed to see his versatility through lack of ambition. Lets see him over 1m2f used as a stepping stone to the Arc ... they will soon put him above Dancing Brave after that. |
|
By:
As we know HRAC in the past has liked his colts to be specialists at one trip so dont hold your breath.
|
|
By:
The difference here HRAC is you have a once in a lifetime horse and a once in a lifetime opportunity to show he is the best (which must include versatile at trip) flat horse ever.
|
|
By:
also...I was fairly disappointed to hear Sir Henry say Frankel won't be going to the Breeders Cup either.
Suppose that's my fault for being disappointed. Just thought given the name they would've at least graced the Breeders Cup once his career. shame. |
|
By:
Dear God but if he doesn't race against a serious horse soon it will be the biggest waste in Flat racing history
Mr Mischief, I totally agree. |