its because the jockey couldnt claim - but i would agree that taking the quality of the jockey into consideration when handicapping is never usually done so why do it in this instance.
its because the jockey couldnt claim - but i would agree that taking the quality of the jockey into consideration when handicapping is never usually done so why do it in this instance.
also it was good of the owners to let the young lad keep the ride when he couldnt claim - but who would do that now knowing the handicapper will punish them for it.
also it was good of the owners to let the young lad keep the ride when he couldnt claim - but who would do that now knowing the handicapper will punish them for it.