Forums

Horse Antepost

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
HENRY THE ATEF
28 May 10 19:00
Joined:
Date Joined: 28 Feb 06
| Topic/replies: 288 | Blogger: HENRY THE ATEF's blog
No not talking through my pocket but the way they are playing punters is a black day for them a stain indeed

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 57
By:
turnip turns
When: 28 May 10 19:06
They think they can do what they like and when they like imo,take last years Derby,his horses didn't enter the parade ring until very late,very poor behaviour ,no class at all imo.[smiley:crazy]
By:
Kevbetting superstar
When: 28 May 10 19:15
They are under no obligation to do anything for punters.
By:
Prima Donna
When: 28 May 10 19:22
Thats true they operate for their own interests only.And why should it be any different,people are very naive if they ever think otherwise.
By:
Bullwinkle
When: 28 May 10 19:24
No worse than Jim Bolger
By:
Terminal Perversion
When: 28 May 10 19:25
Prima Donna has nailed it, the naivety of people on here thinking that trainers let alone multimillionaire breeding operations give a fiddlers about punters is astounding. It's a jungle out there....
By:
hippie
When: 28 May 10 19:31
He's not the Messiah, he's a very naughty boy!
By:
HENRY THE ATEF
When: 28 May 10 19:35
WITHOUT US THE GAME IS FINISHED
By:
zilzal1
When: 28 May 10 19:36
Yep it is true that no one in the racing business seems to care about its customers

Remind me how racings share of the gaming market has gone down compared to other products.

As long as they dont bleat about the levy when punters lose faith in the product and switch to other forms of gambling where there is more transparency
By:
HENRY THE ATEF
When: 28 May 10 19:37
They didnt want a vet to look at cape blanco after dante why could there be more than the lameness a vet might have found
By:
elisjohn
When: 28 May 10 19:41
good question henry, ive had my suspicions for ages
By:
HENRY THE ATEF
When: 28 May 10 19:41
I think it would be even more damaging for Ballydole if JM rides SNA now pr ballsup if he does
By:
Prima Donna
When: 28 May 10 19:43
IMO because the vet may find that injury was worse than was stated.
By:
HENRY THE ATEF
When: 28 May 10 19:47
Media luvvies are to scared to ask any decent questions of big stables dont want to upset them,bloody Emma Spencer wouldnt even interview Haley Turner ffs like she is irreplaceable lol
By:
Graeme83
When: 28 May 10 19:47
Good thread Henry. The contempt these people have for us cannot be ignored. Jock Stein once said that football without the fans is nothing. The same would apply to horse racing.
By:
Terminal Perversion
When: 28 May 10 19:50
Henry & Zilzal I agree with you about the punters importance in financing the game but that doesn't mean the trainers/owners/breeders do, the game is tilted in their favour and always has been, that's what bugs me people acting as if this is a new thing.
With regards to the cape blanco affair, playing devils advocate here, O'Brien wasn't at the track and was unaware of how potentially serious (or not) the injury was so letting a bha vet take him for a trot on an injured leg probably didn't sound like the best idea. remember these are stallions with values in the millions and if I was an owner I would be backing the trainer every time.
By:
HENRY THE ATEF
When: 28 May 10 19:55
absolutely they have all become more media freindly for one reason to keep us interested in racing like they are giving us a real insight .........how patronising...does anyone really beleive owners and trainers and jockeys dont lay horses through 3rd 4th 5th parties giving them a wage in the process,yes they are seen to be doing something to clean up racing, wow we are treated like thickos at every turn
By:
zilzal1
When: 28 May 10 19:59
Terminal, its mostly my gripe the way Ballydoyle operate now. I have followed racing for around 40 years now and cant remember MVOB running his operation like they do. The most he had in the Derby was three(if i remember rightly in 1977) and i cant remember the who will run saga we have now these days from the yard.

Yep a yards loyalty must be to its patrons, but its a big operation with worldwide supporters and must realise its own importance within the racing world
By:
A_T
When: 28 May 10 19:59
It's such a game. The way it's presented now they have 4 potential Derby winners. Can't all be champions - most likely they will all be average.
By:
Terminal Perversion
When: 28 May 10 20:00
Agree again but for me instead of letting it piss me off I incorporate it into my betting and analysis of markets especially the antepost classics, most of what comes out of these camps is disinformation/hype in order to protect the future STUD value of the horse not to aid the ordinary punter  in winning cash...
By:
HENRY THE ATEF
When: 28 May 10 20:03
Cape Blanco wasnt unsaddled on the track or anything nor was he  mortally wounded so a little trot would surely have not made anything worse big time charlie they would have thrown the library at them if it was dandy nicholls for example
By:
turnip turns
When: 28 May 10 20:06
Lets put this another way,do you think the way they behave is good for racing ?
By:
Terminal Perversion
When: 28 May 10 20:06
I agree with you but that says more about the yellowness of the BHA than the behaviour of either trainer you mention.
By:
elisjohn
When: 28 May 10 20:10
i really detest coolmore, not you SOF AND OTHERS, just their empire of ruling the world,
By:
A_T
When: 28 May 10 20:11
To be fair though nothing they've done comes close to Bolger's antics with Teofilo and New Appproach.
By:
Horsesforcourses
When: 28 May 10 20:11
I personally find it very sad that they screw this game for everything it's worth to THEM and give sweet FA back.

Not surprising given how they conduct themselves in business (just look at Mtchells and Butler most recently)but still disapointing all the same.

By the time the next trainer comes in the eventually replace AOB I would dread to think what state the sport of kings will be in. The sport of paupers more like...
By:
Terminal Perversion
When: 28 May 10 20:13
Turnip if you read my previous posts you will see that I think the game is completely distorted in their favour, I disagree with it and with some of their behaviour but I am far from shocked by it, but it isn't anything new so instead of punters pissing against the wind and directing their ire at the aforementioned culprits why aren't they attacking the authorities and system that allows them to flourish..
By:
lobster luck
When: 28 May 10 20:15
Imagine what we would have been subjected to if they had Sea the Stars?????  Conections had a superstar and you didn't get this hype and bull from them.  25k bet on here tday on SNA after negative publicity makes me question if the wheels have really come off.
By:
Figgis
When: 28 May 10 20:18
Ballydoyle will do whatever suits their own interests, which they're entitled to do. However, to answer TT's question, then I don't see how the way they operate is doing racing any favours. Ante post betting helps to generate interest in racing, but their shenanigans end up turning many people off getting involved. Personally I don't really care however much they arse about, I will still just back whatever I fancy, they've been chucking horses at the Derby for the last eight years without any success.
By:
turnip turns
When: 28 May 10 20:19
TP,totally agree about the Authorities,bunch of gutless w a n k e r s imo,and Coolmore know it,if this was a lesser operation we were talking about do you think they would get away with it,i think not.
By:
hippie
When: 28 May 10 20:25
what is it they're supposed to be getting away with?
By:
Kevbetting superstar
When: 28 May 10 20:32
Almost too funny to post.  what a load of tripe.

SNA backers talking thru their pockets.
By:
zilzal1
When: 28 May 10 20:34
zilzal1     10 May 10 16:37 
That is the 64k Question, 3yos can suddenly leap forward and bridge a gap. Another question being do you trust SNA's form at his price, we still have the Dante and the Irish 2000 to go yet, and as much as i was taken by him in the RP, i have this nagging feeling that hes going to be one of those two year olds that cost people money at three.


Hardly a SNA backer here
By:
Figgis
When: 28 May 10 20:35
I'm a SNA layer actually.
By:
turnip turns
When: 28 May 10 20:35
Not getting their horses in the parade ring in the Derby until the last minute,not allowing vets to look at their horses,etc,they seem to think they can do as they wish,it doesn't look good does it.
By:
turnip turns
When: 28 May 10 20:36
Kev,haven't had a bet in it yet.
By:
Kevbetting superstar
When: 28 May 10 20:37
Figgis - where do you have JV in your speed ratings please?
By:
bestmate
When: 28 May 10 20:42
SNA out . Loving it. Absolutely loving it purely for the anticipated financial gainsSilly
However agree with TT. Went to Epsom last year & felt so cheated at the time when 5 horses didn't turn up. In hindsight it wasn't a bad thing to keep looking at the great STS instead
By:
Figgis
When: 28 May 10 20:45
I have him on a good figure when winning the Criterium, Kev, the Gallinule though was a farce as far as times are concerned, as they crawled. I think some people are getting a bit carried away by what was pretty much a non event. Although, I've backed Bullet Train and that trial was also slowly run.
By:
The Headmaster
When: 28 May 10 20:47
Slow run debut good for JV though, maybe?  Wouldn't want him throwing up a big number two weeks before the Derby imo..
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com