Forums

Classics 2016

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 50 comments are related to the topic:
Camelot-Zero chance of winning the Guineas.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 50
By:
ilikewavingatbuses
When: 28 May 12 17:00
yes i love st nic prima, have always been a fan , how could u not after his 2 yr old season. i even remember his maiden where he was backed as tho defeat was out of the question and was very very impressive.

the reason i mentioned him was because BANJACKST implied camelot couldnt be beaten or was special. whether he is or not i dont know but it was the usual day at the office  for aidan spinning his yarns! i was impressed with camelots guineas and didnt think he'd win tbh but he did and i can live with that but its no good BANJACKST telling us the dogs knew AFTER hes wonCrazy

i look forward to his derby run, i hope he wins handsomely!
By:
Monksfield79
When: 29 May 12 22:08
Banjackst didn't imply what your saying Waves, he states its lunacy to lay a certain horse on the strength of a different horse failing ( in this case a montjeu horse winning a 3yr + mile race ) . thats what this topic is about and he makes sense. You completely miss the point.
By:
baNjackst
When: 29 May 12 22:40
Monks it wasn't even the laying part that was disturbing, everyone is entitled to an opinion but when a reported special horse is given a Zero Chance of winning egg should be splattered on their face because the foundation of the argument didn't apply to this specific animal. Theres always another bus to come round the corner to wave at though.
By:
BoxFresh
When: 30 May 12 22:38
baNjackst,did u also read Camelot would win a July Cup,You MUG!!
i think he will be beat on saturday,his price is a joke,far too short
By:
baNjackst
When: 30 May 12 22:52
theres being braindead and having an opinion, face up to it. who mentioned july cup. Im simply telling they gobshhh1ts who said camelot had zero chance know zip. freshie
By:
baNjackst
When: 30 May 12 22:56
Zero Chance and there still arguing, how long you out for?
By:
baNjackst
When: 30 May 12 23:01
this topic is over because the original posters proved they know Zero. and boxfresh finish school, not a good idea to drop out at junior infants
By:
ilikewavingatbuses
When: 31 May 12 11:35
Monksfield79
29 May 12 22:08
Joined:
04 Jan 12
| Topic/replies: 2 | Blogger: Monksfield79's blog
Banjackst didn't imply what your saying Waves, he states its lunacy to lay a certain horse on the strength of a different horse failing ( in this case a montjeu horse winning a 3yr + mile race ) . thats what this topic is about and he makes sense. You completely miss the point.
Rate reply:
| report block user
baNjackst

baNjackst
29 May 12 22:40
Joined:
20 Jun 11
| Topic/replies: 37 | Blogger: baNjackst's blog
Monks it wasn't even the laying part that was disturbing, everyone is entitled to an opinion but when a reported special horse is given a Zero Chance of winning egg should be splattered on their face because the foundation of the argument didn't apply to this specific animal. Theres always another bus to come round the corner to wave at though.




i didnt imply the camelot COULDNT win the derby. but u (BJ) were talking (after the raceCrazy) that the dogs were barking about how special he was Laugh (again all this AFTER hes feckin won pmsl). u obviously thought the same thing about st nic abbey too as he was as impressive in winning the RP eased down, so please dont imply u are some sort of judgeCrazy

you obv back all the ballydoyle hype machines on the back of your 'even the dogs knew' theoryLaugh.

let me guess you didnt back OR lay so abbeyLaugh ffs u after timing ****. i post on the main forum, stick your opinions/ tips up there BEFORE  the race so we can all have a good laugh, cheers.
By:
baNjackst
When: 01 Jun 12 07:19
My opinion nothing to do with horse, I stating obvious. Zero chance means under NO CIRCUMSTANCES. No wonder some people cant read form.
By:
baNjackst
When: 01 Jun 12 08:05
For the persons who need some of the six inch space filled between their ears, I never stated after the fact that I believed Camelot would win the Guineas nor did I have an expressed opinion before the race. I have simply stated since the race the reasons why I believe it was not very clever to go down the road of stating a strong favorite had Zero chance.
At least the original posters are embarrassed but some just won't let go and the best way of describing em type are CHASERS and professional losers
By:
ilikewavingatbuses
When: 01 Jun 12 11:23
i never stated he had 'ZERO' chance, this isnt my thread and i always had the utmost respect for Camelot.

its funny u talking about dogs barking after hes won thoPlain

u sound shrewdWhoops
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com