|
By:
I.e 3 Dogs that ran Yarmouth Wednesday Night ,that will Not see a dog track again IMVHO , thats one Night 12 Races
Not Singleing out Yarmouth BTW Never mind the Amount of Dogs carrying injuries that are running day in day out That figure provided by the GBGB is a blatant lie END OF |
|
By:
All shouting and roaring about a New Track , Do we need a new Track ? Over Half the Tracks we have are racing Empty daily , Its blatant animal exploitation IMO
|
|
By:
notts replacing PB sat night before DP takes over
|
|
By:
lots of tracks racing sat night does make sense imo
what doesn't make sense is 5 meetings on a fkin monday afternoon |
|
By:
Yes agree Hopefully there are people attending , plenty of the Meetings ending by 9.30
The 1 % injury rate , What does that Cover ? Because the figure is a Mile out |
|
By:
Are 5 dog races safer than 6 dog races?
Not enough dogs to fill most races at many the meetings. The Industry would be better served by ditching at least 1 am meeting and 1 afternoon meeting daily. |
|
By:
its a slippery slope TG because 0 dog races are safer than 5 dog races
|
|
By:
the sport is 6 dogs over here what most tracks are putting on is a complete sh1tshow imo
|
|
By:
I'd say there's enough dogs for 2 morning meetings, 2 afternoon meetings & 3 evening meetings most days
all tracks should be racing fri and/or sat night regardless whether its on pgr/sis |
|
By:
Agreed, agreed, agreed.
|