he mentions the obvious that they want proven winners to have accounts for small limits so their card can be marked but refuses to acknowledge that normal punters who want to bet opinion against opinion cant get on and confuses this with examples of fraud?............i would have to agree it was more of a ramble than a valid explanation as to why accounts are closed, and online bets are limited to pathetic levels......it was also disconcerting that he did not believe there was such a thing as a normal punter suggesting there was only some kind of punters republic against bookmakers that we are all part of.....
he mentions the obvious that they want proven winners to have accounts for small limits so their card can be marked but refuses to acknowledge that normal punters who want to bet opinion against opinion cant get on and confuses this with examples of
He’s not said anything we didn’t know how they operate been operating for years He’s had few to many red wines befor going on air Your think he’s been running a shop in Croydon last 10 years had to deal face to face ffs Just got keep going getting them accounts getting that value living off them
He’s not said anything we didn’t know how they operate been operating for years He’s had few to many red wines befor going on air Your think he’s been running a shop in Croydon last 10 years had to deal face to face ffs Just got keep going ge
are firms that bad that they seemingly have no confidence in their odds compilers at all? or is it a sign of how little confidence there is in greyhound racing integrity that you can only get shirt buttons on?
are firms that bad that they seemingly have no confidence in their odds compilers at all? or is it a sign of how little confidence there is in greyhound racing integrity that you can only get shirt buttons on?