Forums

Greyhounds

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 93 comments are related to the topic:
WHAT A JOKE TRYING TO BET GREYHOUNDS IN THE YEAR 2017

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 93
By:
wedge1
When: 08 Apr 17 08:54
dr . atkins
07 Apr 17 19:45
Joined: 07 Jan 07 | Topic/replies: 25,346 | Blogger: dr . atkins's blog
that is one of the worst comments about betting on here ive seen inc what woody used to say
doc appreciate this my comment was indeed meant to convey that bet on here the exchange
understand your frustration with early prices but they are offered to reflect if you make a bet a 4/1 chance
surely then there must be 1 or 2 you assume shorter if that's the case use exchange to get your value as for being likened to woody I love a compliment
By:
vindaloo
When: 08 Apr 17 13:25
you have to move with the times. If you dont you will go skint
bookies dont take bets we all know that. either reinvent yourself or go skint
By:
Deptford
When: 08 Apr 17 14:38
Winja, if you want £300 on,do you not try bit and pieces with various firms?
By:
starship
When: 08 Apr 17 16:27
we all know it is getting harder and harder to get on.
why look at BET365 early prices when u know you cannot get on .
easier way, make a price about your selection and if it bigger on here , bet it.
if it is lower, leave it or maybe have some forecasts.
By:
Winja
When: 08 Apr 17 19:15
deptford my philosophy is if those coonts wont lay a bet why would I waste my time grovelling for a bet and marking their card at the same time......also I want the betfair price to be as big as possible so I would be working against myself........starship that was my mantra for years....learned from some very clever people.....however as noted before....you keep leaving bets wheres the fun.....
By:
sparrow
When: 08 Apr 17 19:29
I could never go back to betting with bookmakers and it's 15 years since I did and long before all this nonsense of running around 12 hours before the off.
By:
Captain carnage
When: 08 Apr 17 20:52
If you get invited to a sporting event by betfair or bookmakers you are surely the type who is happy to take
6/4 about a 9/4 down the road for whatever you want!
By:
Winja
When: 08 Apr 17 21:18
fecking reel your neck in you cheeky coont......guest of a guest.....who is a very good judge....
By:
Deptford
When: 08 Apr 17 22:17
Winja, Captain has sussed you!!!! I spat my Champagne out reading that
By:
Yahoo
When: 09 Apr 17 11:02
Something that puzzles me is that H1lls have 3 greyhound compilers I think. Why? Not sure about the other so called big firms. But earlies seem to go up later and later, Ante Post offerings get less and less. What are these fellas getting paid for?
By:
irishone
When: 09 Apr 17 13:10
sparrow if you ever want an edge to dissappear broadcast it on here
By:
sparrow
When: 09 Apr 17 13:41
What edge are we talking about here, irish?
By:
starship
When: 09 Apr 17 14:16
i got no complaints when bookies do not lay arbers.
i understand when they wont lay a bet at the opening show.
would you lay a bet on some one elses prices?
BUT
when they price up races they should be made to lay a mimmium bet.
why employ odds compilers if you dont want to lay a bet?
By:
wedge1
When: 09 Apr 17 18:49
a tissue is was it is a guide you either get matched or cut odds  that's the rule you want larger put it up if someone disagrees with your opinion they will match you hey that's why its an exchange fu  ck the bookies they all run this site
By:
BizzyChops
When: 09 Apr 17 19:46
Going into a betting shop now I feel like a criminal asking for a price
By:
the.mad.dog.man
When: 09 Apr 17 19:55
hello hello
By:
irishone
When: 10 Apr 17 13:09
"starship • April 9, 2017 2:16 PM BST
i got no complaints when bookies do not lay arbers."
By:
irishone
When: 10 Apr 17 13:10
I have, all they do is give punters a bet and lay it off at bigger odds on here
they are the biggest arbers going
By:
dr . atkins
When: 10 Apr 17 17:27
i thought it was just dogs but nope the horses are the same it's an embarrassment and for starship was not a arb market not formed on betfair yet
By:
starship
When: 11 Apr 17 10:19
i got no complaints when bookies do not lay arbers."
if the bookie started with 1 million pound and the arber started with £10, 000. and just laid the arber,
the bookie could go skint, the arber could not
By:
the.mad.dog.man
When: 11 Apr 17 12:27
that took some working outLaugh
By:
shiner
When: 11 Apr 17 12:43
i think we should all remember betting on dog races with massive overrounds then paying 9 per cent tax as well no wonder i was always skint now we have the choice if we think a dog is too short we have 3 choices back lay or abstain if somebody told u that 20 years ago u wouldn't believe them. years ago it was all about being a good judge  now its just as important to be a good punter
By:
starship
When: 11 Apr 17 13:03
that took some working out..Laugh
cheers
i was up all night working that out
By:
wedge1
When: 11 Apr 17 19:10
irishone
10 Apr 17 13:10
Joined: 22 Sep 06 | Topic/replies: 37,675 | Blogger: irishone's blog
I have, all they do is give punters a bet and lay it off at bigger odds on here
they are the biggest arbers going

that's not arbing that's the road to ruin
By:
Lightbulbs Fan Club
When: 12 Apr 17 10:01
The main issue for bookmakers pricing up early is a lack of liquidity and confidence in the markets. Also they are unable or unwilling to pay for decent judges to price up tracks properly and put the time in (in fairness there is not the liquidity there to justify it). Now it is relatively easy to watch the videos and form an opinion, it tends to me even more the case that everyone fancies the same dog in every race. Years ago at the Stow this happened a lot....you could see it on betfair how 1 and half dogs were smashed in a lot of races and the other four drifted.....now it happens regularly at the tracks where the right/warm people play...there is actual cash for very few runners. All that happens if the firms stand their ground with early prices is that ten people all want to back one dog....long term they have no chance tbh (not excusing some of their behaviour, just trying to explain it)
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Apr 17 10:16
Now it is relatively easy to watch the videos and form an opinion, it tends to me even more the case that everyone fancies the same dog in every race. Years ago at the Stow this happened a lot....you could see it on betfair how 1 and half dogs were smashed in a lot of races and the other four drifted


agree with you completely lightbulbs

I find at a certain track I play everyone wants to bet the same pool of dogs, there is no value on here if you cannot get the earlies

in fact I would say its gone so far that if you bet all the "dogs to be on" on here then you have little or no chance of winning
not that there is any such thing as the dogs to be on, all dogs have their prices

the value imo is on the dogs who nobody wants to bet but which you can make a legitimate case for at their prices

obviously you will bet a few lame dogs, non triers etc along the way but if you are taking inflated prices about dogs you have to live with that
By:
Yahoo
When: 12 Apr 17 10:40
Bookmakers pay compilers good money for their so called opinion so it is alarming the way things are. Especially when they will price up at well over 120% in most races.
It baffles me how these blokes are still employed. Hills have 3 on dogs, 365 at least 2. Are they not frustrated at obviously not being rated, or more likely just happy to ride the gravy train and stop anyone with half a clue.
What I find most frustrating of all is that those who work for the firms are more often than not the biggest moaners at not being able to get on themselves with other firms. Hypocrites and parasites.
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Apr 17 11:34
I cannot understand how these people still have jobs if they are not pricing much up and not taking a bet

if I was shareholder in any of the firms, I'd be banging on the door for them all to be sacked because they do absolutely jack sh1t for their money
By:
p_r_e_m_i_e_r__f_a_n_t_a_s_y
When: 12 Apr 17 11:54
Right I will pick up for them, I know odds compilers who work for 2 of the firms. First things first they are not paid good money, they get pretty average wages. Secondly do you think if they where able to just go and lay their opinion with no repercussions they'd still be refusing so many bets? Remember these are opinionated people as well so why would they not be happy to lay their opinion with their firms money that employs them. Thirdly it's a lot different for them having to price up 5,6,7 meetings when we only have to specialise on 1 or 2 tracks, the odds are then heavily stacked against them.

I hate the fact I cannot get on with any of the firms either, it does my fkin head in when you see what you know to be a massive rick but cannot take it but that's the way it is these days. Slandering the actual compilers I don't agree with as of those I know they're just the same as most of us (punters) who are doing what their employer wants them to do thus keeping their jobs.
By:
hectoratoratora
When: 12 Apr 17 12:01
Punters just have to accept that bookmakers are entitled to run their business however they see fit .I dont agree with what they do but there is no point fretting about it.
I was shut down by 365 a couple to weeks ago after a being tolerated for about 18 months to take out £500 on the early prices.Hardly a kings ransom but worth having on prices that were often comically inaccurate.Life goes on.
It is bizarre that they go to the trouble of pricing up but then dont lay a bet because they have no confidence in their own prices.But thats their funeral.
By:
Lightbulbs Fan Club
When: 12 Apr 17 12:37
yes...agree to all points above.. the traders are paid in the region of 25-30k depending on experience...they probably have 60-100 races to price up on a busy day and try and monitor....even a genius is going to struggle to do that properly on a daily basis, and they clearly are not that. Modern bookmaking is no longer entertaining a few shrewdies to mark your card and trade according, it is all about establishing a mass customer base of recreational players who bet little and often on everything....the dogs is a tiny, tiny cog in the wheel unfortunately.....can see both sides of the argument....but little doubt we all end up on betfair battling for a few crumbs of value away from the obvious
By:
starship
When: 12 Apr 17 12:59
odds compilers?
yeaterday in the RACING POST 5.22 crayford last goodbye 7/2.
now i know BET 365 are going go around the 7/2 mark.
they go up early price 7/2.
all the good judges know it is a 6/4 shot.
it won and returned 7/4, it was a account closure.
as i said odds compilers,
the look at the racing post prices, add a piont here deduct a point there,
is that odds compiling?
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Apr 17 13:04
I am not slagging them PF, I am saying why the feck have they got jobs if they are so defensive??

don't even bother pricing up if you are not going to lay them, and consequently if they are not pricing up then time to find other ways of earning a living

It is bizarre that they go to the trouble of pricing up but then dont lay a bet because they have no confidence in their own prices

exactly

Modern bookmaking is no longer entertaining a few shrewdies to mark your card and trade according, it is all about establishing a mass customer base of recreational players who bet little and often on everything....the dogs is a tiny, tiny cog in the wheel unfortunately

also agree
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Apr 17 13:07
3 odds compilers at hills is an absolute fkin joke

flying 4 races each + a few more races when comps are on/sky cards etc
A/P they price up less than they did in years gone by
hotbox prices which are copy and paste from RP prices
distances which is 2 minute job
1 special a day dog X to win by more than 5l @ 6/4 ffs

whatever they are paid it is money for old rope
By:
wondersobright
When: 12 Apr 17 13:09
PP price up every race cut prices for £0-£20
365 has any count got an account with them still
lads similar to hills, few more hotbox markets etc I find them generally ok although early prices different story
danny sat on his arse doing nothing??
missed any out
By:
Lightbulbs Fan Club
When: 12 Apr 17 13:21
The long and the sort of it is...the odds compilers generally speaking have no idea whether things are 7/4 or 7/1...they are getting less than 2k a month after tax and want to stay out of trouble...taking on warm people is a way of losing their job in the longer term. Much easier to bet to 130pc, chop prices and restrict accounts to pennies...lay the proven mugs/recreational punters and keep your head down. Again, not saying it is a good thing, but thats the way it is...once everyone has run out of pals to get accounts, we all end up on betfair thrashing about with all the sharks
By:
deansthemann
When: 12 Apr 17 13:38
The thing that feckin irritates me is how the feck are these koonts allowed to advertise on TV WITHOUT a warning that if you win we may close/restrict your account... Smoking advertising was banned from TV altogether and smoking kills was made to have to appear on the boxes. What feckin regualation is there for punters? No reckon regulation thats what there is. A feckin terms and conditions apply bit at the bottom of TV advertising is not enough. If these koonts want to advertise just so they can get mugs and recreational people betting with them it should be made law that they advertise with 'if you win we may close/restrict your account'. If these koonts don't want to advertise with this, a regulating body should put in place that a minimum £500 take out should stand for any bet. £500 is not a great figure but would be a start, if you can win £500 off a spin of the roulette wheel in the shop or spin of the bandits you should be able to win at least that off a **** bet. If the books were made to have this rule and they didn't like it, maybe then they might start head hunting proper compliers and put them on a decent wage instead of hiring monkeys for peanuts knowing the fact they can get away with it with their current practise.
All this bolloxx about their a business they are entitled to only lay who they want, right thats fine if they want to play by that rule, feckin state it on their TV advertising clearly so people are aware of this before opening an account with them, knowing that if they get good at what they do making a profit that they will get barred eventually. The industry is the least regualted industry in the feckin country, legalised feckin drug dealers they are at present, its a national disgrace.
By:
starship
When: 12 Apr 17 14:17
deanstheman
well said,
By:
garryc
When: 12 Apr 17 14:25
what the bookmakers should do is between them all have an odds compiler for each track paid between all bookies who surely then would be able to be confident in his market as he would have the time to know the dogs and watch the videos,then maybe they would lay a bet,just now its all guess work until the money comes then cut the odds and limit the account,cowards
By:
Yahoo
When: 12 Apr 17 14:55
in reply to premierfantasy. I wasn't slagging off odds compilers (I was once one myself) but was making a valid point.
The guys worth their salt would hate to be seen as copy/paste merchants and take pride in what they put up, and certainly want to lay them to decent money before cutting. Whats happening now must be soul destroying for the blokes who try to do it properly.
Restrictions and stopped accounts aren't going to change. However a proper compiler/ trader will have a say in this and at least give everyone a decent run. Many a mug gets restricted on the back of a couple of bets that bracket them with the shrewdies because of an overzealous and lacking in knowledge new kid on the trading block.
These same new kids then cry their leg off after being restricted themselves, usually trying to get on with information coming from others not themselves.
Its a sorry state and only likely to get worse
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com