Errol "WE DONT WANT TOO MANY OF THE ODDS ON SHOTS GETTING TURNED OVER"

I am not sure Irish, but I hope it's because there is more money on them and so punters will be winning.

I'd prefer this stance than the clown from Beast 365 that says get on Trap 6 at 5/4 as it was this morning, it then comes into 4/6 (& presumably they have liab's) and he says now it's 4/6 I dont like it, I think you should back Trap 3 at 333,000-1 for a bit of value

He's from School of Tony Adams

The assumption that odds on shots are not covered by the books is tenuous.
I am sure they aren't on some occasions, but a good bookie with the right technology can challenge that cant they ?
What is it that causes bookies to allegedly "GROAN" when favs go in, yet they are "BOOK MAKERS"
If they haven't  covered themselves what are they doing there ?
I can understand it when they have to put up prices with little or no punters there, fair enough.
I backed a 20-1 shot at an empty rainy Galway in October and I thought the bookie was going to hit me when he had to pay out