BAGS CONTRACTS

whats the point of giving a contract to a track where no bookmaker in the country is going to take a bet from.

tommy bags is the big three ,they wouldnt have voted it back if they were not going to take bets there.

will see

intersting thread

the fact they are back on does that give us confidence they will re new the bags contracts in general

Why not give another track a chance ,harlow for instance.

I would be very surprised if we still have Bags racing in two years,go into any betting shop day or night and how many people do you see having a bet on the dogs.

And how many people can get a bet on the dogs :(

as long as the big three are making it pays with BAGS RACING it will continue
the day threy stop making a profit
that is the day BAGS ends

How can they make it pay when they only take a tenner a race at certain tracks.

they would not have them if they did not make a profit.
bets off mugs welcomed all day long
it is the shrewdies that are finding it hard to get on

bingo punters doing forecasts tricasts ect, betting 130/ 140 in races in the pound the pope couldnt do it himself, very sad days to yester year im afraid

I still cant makeout why they want to payout thousands of pounds to a track that in the case of billys and joes are not going to take bets there even when there back on bags.

bags will not be around for much longer...the big firms are under massive pressure to cut expenses to service their huge bank debts....the idea of paying tracks (other than their own) quite large sums of money to stage races that they will not take a sixpence on is madness. When Bags ends I fear for the majority of non-bookmaker owned tracks. Sorry to be so pessimistic but it is not hard to see which way the wind is blowing.......

There was a race last night at the track with no name ,where the winner found a chunk of time backed of the board,how much would you get on in the shops .

And they gave them BAGS back the place will never change.

Its not just there its happening everywhere,trainers have to make a living.

It's not because of the racing being**that you can't get on, its because the high street firms have suddenly realised that there are judges out there who know what they are doing.

I've worded that very poorly, I didn't mean to say that the racing was** what I meant to say was that the bookmakers are restricting people MOSTLY because they are good judges not cos they have inside info.

its a bit of both checkboxes, there are some great judges at the game but i was with 2 people earlier today who gave me a dog to back at a certain kent track this week, the reason not being becasue it is particularly fancied, but because the price of the dog is going too be way too big!!!! nudge nudge wink wink ;)

but because the price of the dog is going too be way too big!!!! nudge nudge wink wink
the races have not been graded yet
u have not got a clue how they are going to price
YOU ARE A PRIZED IDIOT

hang on. the races aren't out yet... how do you know its running and more importantly.. what against?

me and starship agree for once... there's a time and a place for everything I suppose

its racing tuesday afternoon!!! whats the problem with that? and am well aware of what its running against

oh. I thought you meant the**

what time race, dont say the trainer or dog name, just the time of the race the so called dogs in

also hows ur dogs at monmore kf ?

Why not reduce the contracts of the trainers

gk will just say is running after the lights come on, and its not my info, just wondered why a couple of fella's were enquiring about what they could get on a dog at crayford today, didnt have any other bets, all they would say was look out for said race on tuesday

skippy.......the trainers with 50/60 dogs or so will not be getting rich with a contract, making a living yes, getting rich no

I used to work in a bags kennel, I knew how much the cheque was for each month!!!