Forums

Greyhound A/P

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
rangers
30 Apr 10 08:01
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 Dec 02
| Topic/replies: 25 | Blogger: rangers's blog
Railers in Trap 5 and 6 but Wide dogs in Trap 3 etc.

Why not have 3 separate pots.

Railers get Trap 1 - 3

Middles get Trap 3 - 5

Wides get Trap 4 - 6

Is that not just common sense.

Yes I did back Eye on the Storm and I am not unhappy I lost my bet. Thats quite common lol. Im unhappy the dog has suffered injury.
Show More
Loading...
Report stevo1 April 30, 2010 9:16 AM BST
Totally agree sport on its knees,authorities living in the dark ages!
Maybe its too sensible a solution to a problem though?
Report stowking April 30, 2010 9:25 AM BST
do agree... but there was miles railers than wides this year... how you gonna do it??? just hold races for the odd railers
Report tobe April 30, 2010 9:49 AM BST
"Is that not just common sense."

no
Report GREENWOOD BLOODSTOCK April 30, 2010 10:06 AM BST
let's just give them all solos and determine the winner on who can do the best time in the trial session.
Report tobe April 30, 2010 10:30 AM BST
alphabetically would be quicker and do away with the need to run dogs at all. quick get the aardvark prefix registered
Report GREENWOOD BLOODSTOCK April 30, 2010 6:20 PM BST
tobe, that's common sense right there!
Report n6 April 30, 2010 7:18 PM BST
rangers you obviously read my post in the sign on storm fans thread just below ;-)
Report tobe May 1, 2010 12:45 AM BST
GREENWOOD
you know when it just feels right
Report the bairn May 2, 2010 1:36 PM BST
6 railers in the final, bring in a furniture van, throw them all in together, may the best dog win. cheers.
Report in the groove May 2, 2010 11:02 PM BST
-
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com