Forums

Greyhound A/P

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
rangers
30 Apr 10 08:01
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 Dec 02
| Topic/replies: 25 | Blogger: rangers's blog
Railers in Trap 5 and 6 but Wide dogs in Trap 3 etc.

Why not have 3 separate pots.

Railers get Trap 1 - 3

Middles get Trap 3 - 5

Wides get Trap 4 - 6

Is that not just common sense.

Yes I did back Eye on the Storm and I am not unhappy I lost my bet. Thats quite common lol. Im unhappy the dog has suffered injury.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 10
By:
stevo1
When: 30 Apr 10 09:16
Totally agree sport on its knees,authorities living in the dark ages!
Maybe its too sensible a solution to a problem though?
By:
stowking
When: 30 Apr 10 09:25
do agree... but there was miles railers than wides this year... how you gonna do it??? just hold races for the odd railers
By:
tobe
When: 30 Apr 10 09:49
"Is that not just common sense."

no
By:
GREENWOOD BLOODSTOCK
When: 30 Apr 10 10:06
let's just give them all solos and determine the winner on who can do the best time in the trial session.
By:
tobe
When: 30 Apr 10 10:30
alphabetically would be quicker and do away with the need to run dogs at all. quick get the aardvark prefix registered
By:
GREENWOOD BLOODSTOCK
When: 30 Apr 10 18:20
tobe, that's common sense right there!
By:
n6
When: 30 Apr 10 19:18
rangers you obviously read my post in the sign on storm fans thread just below ;-)
By:
tobe
When: 01 May 10 00:45
GREENWOOD
you know when it just feels right
By:
the bairn
When: 02 May 10 13:36
6 railers in the final, bring in a furniture van, throw them all in together, may the best dog win. cheers.
By:
in the groove
When: 02 May 10 23:02
-
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com