Bet Vincent

did it happen to be 200 ew smad place at 8/1 (1/4 odds)?

Yeah was actually 150ew backed about 30 mins before the off

was that the only bet the account had made?

Its not just the IP address.

Was any device or network component the same as something a winning account had previously logged into? Had you logged into your bank account on the device used and also logged into your bank on a device previously used by a winning account? The list is endless as to how you can be digitally finger-printed and devices can be linked.

The device in question has logged into at least 14-15 accounts, however some of those ones are still active and lay bets fine, it seems to be just new ones that are going, same with Jan Stames going within a few bets. Im wondering if the solution is putting a device in a "friends" house and using one set per house. The other firms seem to be fine, just these two, cant bet racing with either!

postcode and locales to accounts, bets monitored immediately

Bookies don't like big ew bets when they are offering special ew terms. The Op bet Smad Place at 8/1 - win price was tight 8/1 on bf (less when u factor commish) and the place part much lower than 2/1. If this is indicative
of how the Op bet for the rest of his bets its no surprise it was closed.

Yeah both fair points. I just thought with it being a big meeting it might slip under the radar. I don't think 150ew is a big bet and would even get noticed really. It was interesting that I got the standard this account can no longer bet online msg on the account, but the email a few days later give me the usual restriction email. Some sort of logging system making note of my slight ew value bet perhaps.