|
By:
I'm glad to hear it. I despise arbers, they make any pros job of backing horses so much harder and we get mistaken for lowlife arbers so our accounts get closed even faster than they would normally do so. And all this for 0.5% profit on turnover I presume - honestly arbers need to get a life.
|
|
By:
All arbers do is back value selections, so I'm not sure why you're taking the moral highground. Not a great deal of difference from what most pros do.
On the horse racing forum you're canvassing for runners to go around shops placing bets for you. How come you don't consider this lowlife behaviour? |
|
By:
Because the enemy has always been the bookmaker........always has been and always will be. What I do doesn't hurt other punters. In fact I'm helping my bet placers by making them 10-15k tax free cash per season and in the process hurting the scumbag bookies.
What Arbers do is steal the value selections without having done the work to come to those conclusions hence hurting those pros who have worked hard with their ratings systems or whatever to develop their edge to come to those conclusions to find these selections. It is not even a remotely similar comparison. |
|
By:
So you work hard at your job and so deserve to win whereas arbers are scum and don't. Bizarre logic.
|
|
By:
I don't know if you've noticed but betting is about winning money, bookies don't pay a bonus for the amount of effort you put in.
|
|
By:
Pretty Much it - Arbers don't deserve to win whereas people who have the brains and skill to make it pay do.
I liken it to you doing all the work for a project and when its just about ready to present another person steals your documents and presents it as there own. |
|
By:
What Arbers do is steal the value selections
I always thought that arbing is backing at the bookies and laying it back on betfair regardless of the perceived value if a horse should be 2/1 , but it is evens in the shops and 1.9 on here , it is not a value bet to back clearly , but it is an arb isn't it ![]() |
|
By:
So a bet placer deserves to win even though they have exercised zero judgement? ...
but an arber doesn't for exactly the same reason?... Bizarre non sequitur. The money your placers make is as unprincipled as the money an arber makes and it is facilitated entirely by you. Clearly! |
|
By:
KB - Fair point re: the bet placers and arbers neither having exercised any judgement.
2 reasons why the bet placer money earned is way more principled than the arbers are: 1 - They are earning their money via the bookies for a service they are providing me. Basically they are doing a commission based job versus an arber doing no service to anyone other than ruining the prices for everyone else. I think its very naive to think the arber hurts no one when he/she hurts us all. 2 - Given that it is commonly acknowledged betting is a game between punter and bookie and that bookies have rewritten the rules in their favour my bet placers are just balancing the books a little. What do the arbers do other than work for the bookies by giving an instant alert that they are out of line? Again hurting the punters who want to bet a selection at best price. I do see your point but to me Arbers are the most selfish of all the betting fraternity as they are just in it for themselves without any thought of their brother punters. I am not saying that I lose sleep over what other punters lose but at least i'll leave the overnight best odds out of principle as i don't want to mark the bookies card. |
|
By:
1) Not true. An arber provides liquidity and a better price to those seeking to punt on the exchange.
2) Your first statement would have been true prior to the advent of the exchanges but not now. Your second statement I answered in point 1) Finally, you do what you do for personal gain and that’s fair enough and I wish you well but to attempt to take any kind of moral high ground is completely fatuous. Betting is an intrinsically parasitic and selfish activity … In order for you to be successful others have to fail. Again, I have no problem with that but what I do have a problem with is the self-righteous position you have adopted which seems blinkered, arrogant and completely misguided. |
|
By:
KB -- Betting is an intrinsically parasitic and selfish activity … In order for you to be successful others have to fail
I think that's where we differ in our outlooks. In all walks of life the people who are best at what they do rise to the top and betting for me is no different. I see betting as a challenge, a test of my mind versus the odds compiler and a challenge in how best to optimise my advantage over them. I don't see anything selfish or parasitic about it - if thats how you feel about it then that may be true for you but it wouldn't be for most people who have worked hard to develop their edge over the bookies. Anyway I will leave you to have last say on this as I've made my point but I think trying to compare arbers to people who have developed genuine skills, ratings etc to as equally selfish and parasitic is very misguided of you. I often get the comment "Good for you sticking it to those evil bookies". I wonder does an arber ever get thought that way? You're argument that they provide liquidity on here is partially true but they ruined the price for anyone that bets at a bookies online and definitely ruled out the possibility the cash punter ever even saw the price in the process. |
|
By:
as they are just in it for themselves without any thought of their brother punters.
Fookin hilarious ![]() |
|
By:
The problem with arbers is they very quickly pounce on out of line prices, thus restricting their availability. Furthermore, they dissipate a lot of value by laying off on the exchange and paying commission or backing the other side at bad value odds, just to secure a guaranteed profit. So they are in effect low skilled min-wage types with no prospects that annoy bookmakers and encourage them to shut down anyone who bets substantial amounts when they have the best price.
So when they're shut down they really don't deserve "help" or "creative ideas". They just need to accept that they made a few quid, but the party is over and it's time to move on. |
|
By:
So they are in effect low skilled min-wage types with no prospects
![]() How very dare you! One great bonus of arbing is that you piss off some very pompous people. |
|
By:
lol you don't "piss me off" - I just don't give a sh1t when you run out of accounts.
|
|
By:
Odd thing to say. Why would anyone care if someone ran out of accounts?
|
|
By:
Why would a arber run out of accounts quicker than a successful gambler
|
|
By:
uhhhh??? ...............because every bet of there's is an arb!
|
|
By:
Some people need reminding how bookmakers restricted and closed down punters for centuries before exchanges and arbers appeared. I have letters dated between 1990 and 1999 closing my accounts with Coral, V Chandler, Coomes, AR Dennis, Backhouse (the forerunner of B365), the Tote, P Jolliffe and Stanley Racing (and others I've lost or forgotten about).
Arbers might have increased the numbers of closures/restrictions, but only because they're doing exactly the same thing: winning on the horses. The method doesn't enter into it. Hell, even Syd James got closed down 40 years ago after a lucky streak following tips from the wife's budgie. If you back horses, embrace arbers. Without them you would get £2.14 @14/1 with the books, followed by £2 @ 14.5, £2 @ 14.0 and £2 @13.5 on here, and the rest at 13.0 or 12/1 with the books. But thanks to arbers you will still only get £2.14 @ 14/1 with the books, but you can get the rest on at 14.5 or, at worst, 14.0 on Betfair. |
|
By:
SFB - yes I have these letters too but its not the same now as it used to be and the arbers/betfair combination have a great deal to with it. I'm referring here to horse race betting to be clear - In the days pre Betfair a bookie would know they are best price something and stand it for an amount depending on who was betting it, and dependant on the info they were getting internally where money was going elsewhere - I worked in the industry. The process of restricting/closing people was based on:
1 - How well they were doing over a period - never ever shorter than 3 months. 2 - Their prices taken versus sp. 3 - Whether they were considered tipping line followers. 4 - Who else was doing their selections - known winner links etc. This led to accounts lasting on average 6 months even for good winners. Now the first consideration is whether it is an arb. Naturally if you are a genuine punter and are backing best price sometimes it will be an arb even if you are not aware of it, but because of the bookmaking industry blanket approach not to entertain arbers these genuine punters get caught in the net for arbers. Now sure they would have got closed/restricted eventually if they were any good but "fear of arber" makes bookmakers trigger happy and hence makes a lot of genuine skilled punters lifes more difficult. You're argument re getting more on here at betfair because of the arbers is completely false except pricewise selections. There is nothing on here but pennies before noon except saturdays - by the time the arbers have put up their money a 14/1 shot that a genuine punter could have filled his boots on @ 12/1, 11/1 and 10's is now 7/1 at the bookies and 8.6 on here. Remember the Arber very often inadvertendly gets the snowball of money going on a selection cos they see the arb, people who were waiting to do it are then rushing and the lemming followers of money add to the price crash. I see this daily hence my absolute despise of arbers. |
|
By:
'It's always about beating the bookie'. This is a misconception. It's about beating other punters. The bookie is a middleman. He takes a cut for acting as an intermediary. His cut may be fat, perhaps because he has staff and electricity bills to pay, or thinner, because he has efficient technology and fewer overheads.
Anyone who wins is winning out of the bets of mostly incontinent, price-inelastic, last-minute punters. They are the net losers; they pay, first of all, the salary of the bookie and his agents, and second, the earnings of winning punters. When the price-taker or arber can't get on, they need to think it's because there isn't enough losing money in the game to support them. Partly this is bookmaker greed--but only partly. There are not enough doctors and country solicitors and City boys betting 100k a year and being able to afford to lose 5% on turnover. Instead, we're winning from people on benefits in the shops, who are betting less. |
|
By:
Some good arguments on this thread. You don't often see "non sequitur" used here.
What happened to the OP, though? You'd think he'd want to defend his position :) |
|
By:
I'll give the OP a tip cos im drunk ... don't bother arbing early prices or any Win prices period... concentrate on big field handicaps that are overbroke in the place (anything pre live show is workable) ... spread your bets around , give some value back and you might get a reasonable run for your money.
|
|
By:
oh and askari ****g nailed it
|
|
By:
oh and askari ****g nailed it
Yep. |
|
By:
surely the fault lies with the people putting up shorther prices on betfair
take them away and the arbers are no longer |
|
By:
Arbing is clearly the most sensible way to make money from betting.No risk.I wish I had the skill,and the accounts to do it.
|
|
By:
Skill??? C'Mon really?? Think pushing a letter into an envelope requires more skill.
|
|
By:
Ok Wish I had the accounts to do it.No ego involved in my betting unlike yo.
|
|
By:
Betting is all about ego for most people. The feeling that they have figured it out better than the odds compilers and other punters. Nothing wrong in that and I can't see what would keep you going in betting if you didn't have that. Winning money is just a product.
|
|
By:
Winning money is just a product.
That's not always true. Some people just go to work to make a living. There are loads of businessmen, for example, who are happy to carve out a day's wages without being best at what they do. Not everyone wants to be Richard Branston or Alan Sugar. |
|
By:
*Branson
- always get in a pickle with that one. |
|
By:
Guess the low skilled min-wage types with no prospects quote must be true then.
|
|
By:
Are there really that many arbing opportunities around? Seems to me it is just a good excuse for bookies to close and/or restrict accounts as there really cannot be that many opportunities available given the amount of money in the BF markets up to say an hour before racing starts outside of the big meetings.
|
|
By:
Unfortunately there is arbing software out there that highlights the arb. So it makes life easy for the weasal arbers.
|
|
By:
Spend hours studying form/creating your own ratings/working at whatever edge you've created versus clicking a few buttons, banking the guaranteed cash and wandering off to spend time with your family. You can see why arbers are happy enough with their approach.
Some laughable statements on here from you, racingguru. Double standards doesn't even begin to cover it. |
|
By:
RTB -- Yes, I hate arbers with a vengeance and yes I believe they cause untold damage/cost to normal punters with the way the operate and yes I believe they are super selfish for doing so. This is consistent in this and every other thread I've mentioned arbers.
I don't see the double standards you are accusing me of but if you equate all winning equal then you are entitled to your point even though its incorrect. Like, I would think that laying a horse that you had the inside info on that was not trying is fraudulent but its winning. |
|
By:
if you equate all winning equal then you are entitled to your point even though its incorrect
You're entitled to think it's incorrect, even though it's not. If I win £100 arbing and you win £100 through hours of hard work, the bottom line is still we're £100 up apiece. You seem to think that there's some glory in what you do, but that anyone making it through arbing is pure scum. Whatever you need to tell yourself, I suppose. The fact is that you're taking value prices, as are arbers. If you take pride in how you know that the prices are value, that's your lookout. Some people are happy to have the work done for them (by the likes of you). You've got a team of placers throughout the country, meaning that you can circumvent limits that are put in place so that the book can manage its risk. You then seem to tell yourself that this is acceptable because the bookie is the bad man and deserves it. Would the bloke who nips down to Lads to have his tenner on at 14/1, only to get 12/1 after your mob have smashed it in every county in the land, be entitled to think that you're scum and ruining it for everyone? Or should he be saying "Wow, that racingguru bloke is so clever, I wish I was like him. Still, always next week."? |