|
By:
Can't they keep the old site going alongside it?
Sure, let them allocate all their developers and new efforts to the new site. Let them devote more time and effort to mobile and sportsbook if that's management's priority. But why go against their long-standing customers' wishes and pull something that most of them actually prefer? |
|
By:
That would be my preference too askari.
Alternatively, they should design a new stripped down interface for people who are essentially using the site professionally and are much more interested in speed and performance than anything superficial. Focussing particularly on how well it performs when it's open in multiple tabs simulataneously. |
|
By:
I've started a similar thread on the Cricket forum.
|
|
By:
cool, I'll have a look and chuck in my two million drachmas worth
|
|
By:
Seems like the old site has been off and on today. At the moment, there's no old site available for me, so I've had to be on the new site. Quite a quiet day, so not been heavily using it, but when I have, it's still awful. It's very sticky, even though it's a quiet day across the exchange - much worse than the old site used to get at busy times a few years ago. Anyone else experiencing this?
On a positive note, I'm pleased they've improved the settings so you can get rid of all the casino game rubbish etc. |
|
By:
I've had to play the new site today, and I absolutely hate it.
If Betfair have no regard for their customers wishes, I'll find somewhere else to bet. |
|
By:
"Australian markets will remain on the old site."
So that means they're not going rid of the old site at all then. |
|
By:
Spoke to someone at Betfair Towers today and he reckons the IT bods are well aware of the stickiness on the 'my markets' bit and are still developing that section. Fingers crossed they'll sort it before the football season starts, otherwise it'll be unusable at busy times. The interface seems much better to me now - I think I could get used to it after a while. The key thing is to get it running as quickly and smoothly as the old site, which still seems some way off.
|
|
By:
I would read this thread and reply to it. but I can't because the scroll bar has disappeared!
|
|
By:
No mention of Australian customers and non-Australian events. I still get the old site for all events. I recall bf's poker, casino, etc aren't allowed in Oz, which could be the reason.
|
|
By:
R.I.P old site :(
|
|
By:
i completely understand why they wanted to change what's under the hood and how and it works.
and someone needs to be kept busy developing new shiny front ends to keep them busy i suppose, but why oh why they haven't developed a skin which is exactly like the old site with exactly the same functionality, BEFORE SWITCHING OFF THE OLD SITE, is a mystery. they managed it with the forum and that was having to work with a third party and a COTS forum solution. |
|
By:
I've been on the new site for ages but bizarrely today when I click an unmatched bet in my unmatched bets list it takes me to the market in the old site. Hasn't done that since the new site was first up I don't think and certainly wasn't doing it yesterday.
|
|
By:
They haven't changed what's under the hood. Had they changed the exchange functionality or how it worked, the old site wouldn't work. The changes are all cosmetic, navigational and fixing elementary design errors like too much dead space on the screen.
BTW, I agree with El Presidente, what us power users (to slip into tech jargon) need is a stripped down version that gets rid of all the stuff we don't need and just displays what the market is, current bets offered, and our bets offered and matched. |
|
By:
You're describing the various API software there.
|
|
By:
Been off the site all day. Just come back, and for some reason it's forced me onto the old site again - heavy work must be underway on the new site.
After a few days of the new site, I'd almost forgotten how smoothly and quickly the old site runs. It must be at least 10 times quicker at loading a market. It was becoming a real chore flicking between markets on the new site - it got to the point that I was having to click refresh in the browser and after a chunky 4-5 second wait it'd load the market I wanted. It'd be impossible to trade efficiently at busy times if left as it was. They have to sort it properly before pulling the plug on the old site!!! |
|
By:
Having said that, just tried to open the site in Mozilla rather than Chrome, and it's taken me to the new site without an option to go back to the old site. The whole thing is an absolute mess.
|
|
By:
Well, the forum has a scroll bar today, which it didn't yesterday. But the sports menu doesn't have a scroll bar! So I can't even access the special bets. Even though I have matched bets on the "Next Prime Minister" market, which was saved to "My Markets" on the old site, I can't access the market!
Betfair, why didn't you get the new site to actually work before taking down the old site? |
|
By:
Absolutely ridiculous that they've had a couple of years or so to develop the new site since it was launched. It's only when they're in the process of shutting down the old site and forcing the serious, data heavy and time sensitive players onto the new site, that they realise it's still not fit for purpose outside of casual punting.
This is all during one of the quietest weeks of the year as well. God knows what it's going to be like at 2-3pm on a Saturday afternoon in the football season. |
|
By:
You're describing the various API software there.
I've used Geeks Toy quite a lot and Bet Angel a bit. Both suffer from the same (or similar) over complication that BF does. All a trader does is buy and sell. The only trick is knowing what price to buy and sell at, and how much to buy and sell. All I need to know is what others are offering to buy and sell at, what I am offering to buy and sell at, and my net position from what I have bought and sold to date. And to scale to as many simultaneous markets as possible. The only other feature I'd rate as 'must have' is a way to highlight when best prices have changed that stays highlighted until I see it and clear it, and no one does that satisfactorily. All my current markets on a single scrolling screen would be great.* None of the API product developers seems to get what a volume trader does. * I was in the SW biz for a long time and would have no problem describing exactly what would fulfil my requirements. |
|
By:
'Serious, data-heavy and time-sensitive players'--do they actually want these customers?
They want recreational custom losing to them and their incumbent layers, who are paying more than 20% winnings in comm. But do they want these incumbents undercut by nimble players, either with a better tissue frequently hitting the market for best price or taking a little out of price movements due to some technical skill trading? If these people are winning small- to medium-sized five-figure sums a year, does bf have any interest in catering for them at all? |
|
By:
I agree whole-heartedly with pxb. I just need a basic site. I've looked at a couple of APIs and just too much stuff on screen. I'm surprised someone hasn't copied the old site. Would make a fortune.
|
|
By:
Of course they need such players in the ecosystem - they provide liquidity, fill gaps in markets and provide better prices at both ends for both the average punter and trader. They also provide a good source of revenue through the PC.
|
|
By:
Romford, I avoid the pc through having arbed off two multiples which won at straight bookmakers for about 60k. I'm a small player with no more than a 0.25% edge on turnover counting all money bet and haven't made anything like 60k on bf.
Having bet in about as much money as you can get on at the High St without having a sophisticated placing operation e.g. to win £1,000 per bet two or three times for good races for the books, and traded, arbed and taken positions on bf, I feel I have a good line on what the customer experience is like at bf. It's got a lot worse in the last 8-10 years--with the company getting back to you slower, less efficiently and less courteously. I feel people like me are the canary in the coalmine--but that the mgt. don't care and think they can grow their way to stock market riches on the back of sportsbook and mobile. But with declining liquidity on all but major markets close to off times, I have the sense they're risking losing a lot of their winners, market makers and opinion players. If you try to point out to the company that their offering is far worse, they become defensive and think they're doing well enough with a buoyant share price. Then a plausible competitor is going to come along. |
|
By:
long time no posting...but had to come out of retirement so to speak to say this new **** is exactly that.
|
|
By:
the new site is crap
|
|
By:
Betfair have sabotaged the old site for me again. They've made it slow and impossible to use. Last time they had that Loading please wait message stuck on the screen, this time it takes ages to adjust odds and submit a bet. Company is run by vermin.
|
|
By:
what pisses me off is that this exchange+ waffle is merely a way of telling us that the old site is being closed down without admitting it and that this was so transparent that no one even felt the need to mention it on either side. that sort of short term pr bull (seemingly standard practice since well before the premium charge was introduced) serves no purpose other than to sully betfair's reputation.
|
|
By:
Bf's symbol of the new site is a V-sign--the right way round, but one can only wonder whether someone in the company isn't giving the old users the finger. What a message that would be to send!
|
|
By:
Well, finally I'm stuck with this thing, though I have the old site open in a coupleof legacy tabs.
Opening the same market in both, the contrast is stark. One simple question which i would love to see someone from betfair try to address: When I open the top australia batsman market in the old site, I can immediately see 11 runners in full, with no scrolling. Doing the same in the new site, I can see 7. So what am I getting in return for that lost functionality? Because in terms of the interface I can't see anything at all. Unless you count nearly two inches of completely blank yellow space as functionality. Two years and god knows how much money's worth of development, and all BF's you achieved is to make three legacy tabs the most precious things on my laptop. |
|
By:
Also out of retirement to post what a crock of poo this new site is.
|
|
By:
1. announce that you're switching off old site in the future explaining why.
2. engage and incentivise experienced users to alpha and beta test new site, providing exclusive access. 3. roll out new site. 4. switch off old site. would seemingly be the right approach. instead 3. roll out new site, but make access to it optional. (obviously no experienced user is going to choose to use something new and broken over something that they are familiar with and works) 4. switch off old site. 2. get feedback from experienced site users about everything that it wrong with the new site now that they are finally forced to use it. 1. announce why you've switched off the old site. ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
Hello Lori.
Plus, DStyle, that explanation from the CTO is just a crock. There is absolutely no reason the "new backend platform" can't be skinned to look like the old interface. Unless someone's going to tell me that the new API won't work without a big strip of empty yellow space at the top of the page? |
|
By:
i said that below vep.
of course you could have provided an old site skin which sat on top of the new API, and that should have been done before switching off the new site. it's exactly what they did with the forum and they had third party software to worry about then as well. |
|
By:
i have been migrated today,everything seems more cluttered than neccessary to me with lots of things that are uneeded.i suppose this old dog will have to learn new tricks
.i will get used to the new site but after 10 years plus it will take awhile. |
|
By:
listening to customers blah blah, better experience blah blah, SHYTE
|
|
By:
Why don't they open up some kind of forum where users can tell them exactly what's wrong with the new site and listen to them?
For horse racing, the screen is too small to accommodate the number of runners you're likely to need to see for a start, and you can't turn off the colours (so you can see your position more clearly) while keeping the rollout trainer, rider and form as you could in the old site. A major loss of functionality, yet the technology officers don't seem to understand this.... |
|
By:
*rollover connections and form
|
|
By:
what a pile of crap.
|