|
By:
It's a good idea. Something I would have suggested to them a long time ago if I A) thought they would listen to my idea, and B) deserved to get good ideas for free.
|
|
By:
Oh, and Betfair never email me information about anything, so thanks for posting.
|
|
By:
That was the reason they touted when they first brought out cross matching but it never happened and was just used to skimp off the exchange. Guess they're now getting desperate to prop up the balance sheet and looking to steal any pennies going.
Trouble is it's just so short sighted like the x-matcher, the x match/market only ever takes money and doesn't put money into the exchange whereas all the players they've driven away with penny pinching/pc etc were the ones who actually put liquidity into the exchange. The markets naturally ran at small spreads with people continually playing to tight margins but most have now left and taken the liquidity with them. |
|
By:
I agree it's a good idea. As I understand it, it's fundamentally different to when they introduced the x-matcher- back then they simply replaced the bots people had already introduced and thus took money that previously their customers had been making, whereas now because of their per-market commission structure they are able to provide liquidity in situations people's bots couldn't without making a loss?
|
|
By:
Also how are they going to apply this to Draw No Bet if it's only the 0.5 lines in the AH they are applying it to?
|
|
By:
They say "the -0.5 to +0.5 lines in the Asian Handicap". That might include *Home team* -0, and *Away team* -0.
|
|
By:
It's bad news for anyone who arbitrages between markets, a simple but effective method to a) make money b) reduce PC payments. For now they'll use it on empty markets, but soon they'll be replacing bots/manual arbitrage punters on more liquid markets.
It's good news for anyone who wants a punt. |
|
By:
The X matcher is still far from perfect. Try putting lays on all Outcomes into an empty market with multi-runners (say 4). Your lays appear on the Back Side (obviously) and if you lay to say 110% what would you expect the X matcher to show on the Lay side?
The result shows you how much would disappear ... Maybe I'm being harsh and the latest update to the X matcher will massively improve this "feature" as well. Will wait and see. |
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
"We hope to load the first matches using this new logic early in November, but how widely and quickly we roll this out will depend on how testing goes between now and then. Of course we need to test not only that the logic works as expected, but that performance is good too and above all our customers are safeguarded."
|
|
By:
So they say 4 football markets but any ideas which others bf could link. Many similar markets have slightly different rules eg tennis retirements, football abandonments.
|
|
By:
@sun - are you sure about:
"They don't even cross-match within the same AH line" I've just been playing around on http://www.betfair.com/exchange/football/market?id=1.115810111 and it was fairly clear if I asked for a higher back price on Scotland than available, that generated a lay offer on Scotland and the corresponding XM back offer on Poland. |
|
By:
The example they give is simple but they will be able to cross-match from several markets once they start stacking up the alogorithms.
|
|
By:
longbridge, I am not certain. I think I may even have looked at the same market yesterday and immediately noticed that there was clearly no cross-matching (based upon, say, three back offers at widely different prices but only one lay offer on the other side).
Possibly the cross-matcher hadn't 'woken up' yet. It sure looks like it is cross-matched now. There is a bot active, though, so you can't be totally certain who is responsible. |
|
By:
Not many markets can be cross matched. Can anyone post some none obvious examples as I'm struggling to find some. It's a good idea though.
|
|
By:
Each of the Over/Unders with one line of Total Goals.
Team A +1, +2, +3 , each with multiple lines of AH and/or Match Odds Under 0.5 with Correct Score 0-0, which is also Next Goal (No Goal) until the first goal is scored, after which No Goal becomes the same as Under 1.5 / CS 1-0, etc etc |
|
By:
Sorry those were obvious examples. But there are quite a few of those. They'll have their hands full just doing the obvious ones.
|
|
By:
Total goals needs 7 or more goals to be settled, correct score needs any unquoted (although this is changing so cs will be open all match I believe) where as o/u and next goal are settled immediately. Obviously abandonments are very rare but if it looks slightly possible then people bet overs or lay no next goal and bf could be left significantly out of pocket?
|
|
By:
Good point.
They can still crossmatch the Unders bets and Overs lays with Total Goals. Why is cs changing, do you know? Is it related to this? |
|
By:
Correct score markets explanation from Betfair:
We currently offer all quoted scores from 0-0 to 3-3 in Football Correct Score (C/S) markets, with “Any Unquoted” listed as a selection to cover all possible scores where one or both teams scores four or more goals. In many situations, perhaps where one team is a strong favourite like Barcelona at home to Elche, “Any Unquoted” will be the favourite in that market. It’s effectively an inexact proxy for “Barcelona to win and score heavily”. We’ve had some customer feedback asking for “Any Unquoted” to be split into three selections, “Any Other Home”, “Any Other Away” and “Any Other Draw”. That would give customers more choice – those who wanted to back just Barcelona to score a hatful should get a slightly better price, while those who still want to bet on (or against) all three outcomes can dutch them. We are going to trial running correct score markets with those three selections instead of “Any Unquoted” later this year. With football markets offered every day at this time of year there will never be a point where we don’t already have a correct score market loaded on the site, so it won’t be possible to simply switch all markets over to the new selections. That means that we’ll start loading new markets with 19 selections as “Correct Score New”. Already loaded markets will remain as they are now, with 17 selections and called “Correct Score”. Once all correct score markets with “Any Unquoted” have been settled, all correct score markets will have the new template and we’ll rename them all simply “Correct Score” as now. |
|
By:
That's an improvement - and it's better if you're trying to lay off lines of your Colossus (aka "Betfair Pools" bets) into the Exch.
|