Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 83 comments are related to the topic:
NEW UK LAW ON BETTING:POINT OF CONSUMPTION TAX

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 83
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 11 Sep 14 17:02
take it thats to do with sanctions and nothing else??
By:
dave1357
When: 11 Sep 14 17:12
No - there are either laws prohibiting gambling or no laws permitting it in various parts of the world. UKGC views high volume participation in grey markets as a risk to the operator, so won't give a license.

Here is a long-winded article about it

http://www.onlinepokerreport.com/13119/
uk-regulation-shifts-center-of-online-poker-industry/
By:
CoinFlip
When: 11 Sep 14 17:26
This is bad news for punters.  Not worried by Betfair in isolation because the tax is relatively sensible compared with most EU countries.

This is going to eat margin though, just a question of what I have to play with after.  I would expect some reasonably big jumps in matched volumes here but undoubtedly this favours the bigger players with continued access to international funds.

Have to agree with bongo on most points.  It won't improve anything for punters BUT, then, which industry benefits from the taxes on active corporations?  At least as a UK citizen you can be happier that gaming companies will find it very difficult to hide tax for the first time in god knows how long.  Would be good to see it enforced like this in more industries to be honest.  But still agree with bongo, tax revenues aren't falling, public spending is soaring.
By:
IanP
When: 11 Sep 14 17:46
Is there a list of which books have applied for the new license ?  Presumably it applies to those in Gib, Malta , Ireland, IOM etc ?
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 11 Sep 14 18:13
What does the Pinny email say about account balances?  Don't seem to have mine yet.
By:
frog2
When: 11 Sep 14 18:15
I thought quite a few firms would have high rollers in grey markets. Can umbrella companies own an offshore firm for grey markets and a UK firm to operate here under a license here?

Is India classified as a grey market?
By:
frog2
When: 11 Sep 14 18:18
http://www.pinnaclesports.com/gb-notice.aspx?

Funds remaining in your Pinnacle Sports account may be withdrawn at any time free of charge. Accounts that withdraw their funds prior to September 30th, 2014 will be disabled from making further deposits.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 11 Sep 14 18:53
cheers frog
By:
dave1357
When: 11 Sep 14 19:13
^^^^
My email went to spam folder

^^
India def grey

I though subsidiaries would be a way round the problem, but apparently not
By:
vic
When: 11 Sep 14 20:40
So much for free markets!!!!
By:
frog2
When: 11 Sep 14 21:31
So will firms like Betvictor get a UK license. I was reading an article on it from last year...

'But it wasn't until 20 years later that Chandler's biggest break came – In 1996 and 1997 Chandler jumped on planes to China and Singapore and started recruiting high rolling betters. In these regions, bets were often limited – Chandler's unique service proposition was he would accept large bets.

Many of these wealthy customers had been frustrated by their inability to lay sizeable bets on the 1994 football World Cup, he told HuffPost UK. They were also frustrated by having to pay tax, something which was to lead to Chandler’s next big break – moving offshore.

Ahead of the rest of the bookie peers – and unhampered as a private company unlike his listed rivals such as Ladbrokes, Chandler started a search for an offshore base from which to run his business tax-free.


http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/03/08/betvictors-victor-chandler-on-the-future-of-betting_n_2838519.html
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 11 Sep 14 22:29
dave
thanks....havent read it but i can tell where your coming from.


the government may have a legal point re players playing v russians but in reality that bull.
they may sit 3+ to a room using vpns and managing to get ont he same table coluding but im sure coluders would get spotted very easily by other players and would get out quickly.

who seriously makes the regulations up???

do they seriously think people would stay with stars if they thought something iffy???

wonder how much they are trying to get them to pay?

i know spain and italy isoalated their players (thats daylight robbery).


think if ther government did ban stars there could be more chance fo a backlash because of numbers who play with them compared to isolated bookies
By:
dave1357
When: 11 Sep 14 22:32
Heard a rumour that bwin party is pulling out
By:
dave1357
When: 11 Sep 14 23:10
btw I think it is thoroughly ironic that the UKGC who haven't been very good at all at doing their job are telling businesses with turnovers of billions how to do theirs.
By:
frog2
When: 12 Sep 14 07:46
Any chance that Betfair will raise commission and/or Premium charge to pay for the increased costs of the 15% tax??

Maybe a raise to 6.5% basic commission rate as they continue to harvest the exchange business.

They might quietly forget that until 2011 they happily were based in the UK paying tax and making still making huge profits. Now that the competition from the professional sportsbooks is out of the way they might try it on.
By:
frog2
When: 12 Sep 14 07:48
correction moved in 2009.
By:
frog2
When: 12 Sep 14 07:51
Actually moved 2011. Starting complaining about the tax in 2009 a year after the first Premium charge and the stunting of growth.
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 12 Sep 14 09:37
there isnt increased tax though.....

agree dave.
not sure how they can tell companies they cant operate here if you operate in another country....if it was an eu country then they would have to think again
By:
frog2
When: 12 Sep 14 11:25
If you are already licensed and operating in the UK can you take bets from Countries like India? Is it only new applicants that need to pass the test?
By:
dave1357
When: 12 Sep 14 12:03
I would guess they have to report regularly and if the amount of business was significant, justify the legality. 

What I can't understand is how, if a company sets up a ring-fenced uk subsidiary and has other companies to deal with other countries, the UKGC thinks it can tell the holding company (which it wouldn't regulate), how to run businesses completely unrelated to the UK.
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 12 Sep 14 12:37
does seem like they want to know how much business these firms are doing and if their "other" lists are high in numbers they will threaten to revoke their licence .


now why would any regulator seriously do that other than to extort money from such companies?

the shady world we live in eh
By:
Bottom_of_the_League
When: 13 Sep 14 01:29
This has completely killed my career as a professional gambler overnight, after 13 successful years. Some very good points made here. The way the Gambling Commission has managed the betting industry has been nothing short of shambolic from the very beginning.
By:
frog2
When: 13 Sep 14 07:54
What amazes me is that SBOBET is licensed by the Isle of Man. Big building on the Island. Sponsored EPL teams. Not going anyway. Pinnacle been around since 1998 and always the fastest to payout.
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 13 Sep 14 08:56
some of the GC's approach stinks and doesnt sit right.
they are basing whether to hand out licences on percieved thoughts on what countries are like betting wise....who cares if russia is unregulated ffs....and whats the difference if they have 100 russian clients or a million?

that just make sit look like "your making a sh1t load off them" so your not getting a licence now....

seriously....that looks wrong very wrong and imo the GC needs to be investigated.

re pstars....see the yanks are gonna be let back in now so maybe they will ditch the ruskies for the time being
By:
G1_Jockey_4
When: 13 Sep 14 08:57
on the tax side of things....these companies dont have a leg to stand on and should pay up if they want business.

see pinnacle pulled out of spain and i presume italy???a while ago
By:
IanP
When: 15 Sep 14 14:17
Looking at the GC website , it appears thar neither Boyles or VCee are applying for a licence. Marathon and PaddyP are.  Not going to be much choice come Oct 1st.
By:
Woodshires
When: 15 Sep 14 22:33

Sep 15, 2014 -- 2:17PM, IanP wrote:


Looking at the GC website , it appears thar neither Boyles or VCee are applying for a licence. Marathon and PaddyP are.

By:
Woodshires
When: 15 Sep 14 22:35

Sep 15, 2014 -- 10:33PM, Woodshires wrote:


Sep 15, 2014 --  2:17PM, IanP wrote:Looking at the GC website , it appears thar neither Boyles or VCee are applying for a licence. Marathon and PaddyP are.


...

By:
Woodshires
When: 15 Sep 14 22:36
ffs, daft forum....Cry


Ianp, can you pop a link up, cheers.
By:
IanP
When: 16 Sep 14 07:41
You have to search individually I think.  Poor show from the GC really.

This is the link when you search for Paddy Power - remote license Pending.

https://secure.gamblingcommission.gov.uk/gccustomweb/PublicRegister/PRAccountDetails.aspx?accountNo=38939
By:
dave1357
When: 16 Sep 14 12:24
Can't believe VC aren't applying - today is the last day to apply or they have to stop taking uk bets on the 1st Oct, so maybe a few have left it to the very last minute legal/compliance people like to do that, I think it gives them a little thrill.
By:
frog2
When: 16 Sep 14 13:16
I have asked the GC for a full list of remote companies we will be able to use. So far only SBO and Pinnacle have emailed about closing accounts so its up to us to find out who on oddschecker.co.uk we can still use from the end of the month. Not much time to sort it out

Will post if they send the list.
By:
Woodshires
When: 16 Sep 14 15:04
cheers Ian.


1bet pulling out now, from 1st October...Sad
By:
futture
When: 18 Sep 14 00:25
Which exchanges are applying for a license?
By:
dave1357
When: 18 Sep 14 10:20
who knows - its absolutely redic.  The Gambling Commission are def putting peoples funds at risk.
By:
CLYDEBANK29
When: 18 Sep 14 10:53
Saw the "Maurice" VCbet TV advert a day or two ago.  That surely wouldn't be on TV if they were pulling out.
By:
frog2
When: 18 Sep 14 13:57
if people on here are unsure who they can bet with how is the man on the street supposed to know??

It know appears that Victor Chandler International (Betvictor) has an application in progress. Was not on the Gambling Commission website yesterday.
By:
dave1357
When: 18 Sep 14 16:43
Another thing - I thought all UKGC licensees (from last month) had to have at least a separate account for client funds and notices making it clear the level of protection eg full trust or just separate sccount, but eg Skybet (who come up as ukgc regulated) has no notice or info about this
By:
IanP
When: 19 Sep 14 08:38
Skybet's application is pending.  Currently regulated by Alderney.
By:
frog2
When: 19 Sep 14 09:36
Amazing how many of these big companies have their applications pending. Why did they not apply either.

Any word on Matchbook?
Page 2 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com