Forums

General Betting

Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
sheppy123
24 Mar 14 15:27
Joined:
Date Joined: 28 May 12
| Topic/replies: 2,522 | Blogger: sheppy123's blog
I personally would like to see a change where you wouldn't lose your money if your player etc. didn't compete.

I understand that you can get much bigger odds, BUT the trouble is, it opens the doors for people with inside information.

What do you think???
Pause • Switch to Standard View Antepost markets
Show More
Loading...
Report no moves • April 4, 2014 11:54 PM BST
It is what it is! You have to factor in all the variables before you have a bet. I believe if their was automatic no runner no bet, rule, then all it would do is to ensure the prices months before the event would be very similar to the 'on the day market'; if that was right why would you even bother to put bets on ante post?
Report sheppy123 • April 5, 2014 11:35 AM BST
Since posting this I've thought a lot about it. I can understand why you'd lose your stake, but it's the thought of betting on something that somebody somewhere knows isn't gonna happen.

I think I'd rather have lower odds and not lose anything but that's me. Like I say, I can definitely understand why it is like it is. I guess that's the gamble you take???
Post Your Reply
<CTRL+Enter> to submit
Please login to post a reply.

Wonder

Instance ID: 13539
www.betfair.com