Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 113 comments are related to the topic:
Biggest Hard Luck stories

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 113
By:
iprefertolay
When: 01 May 14 23:23
enlighten me desperate, i guess it was a ringer
By:
tobermory
When: 02 May 14 02:45
A punter put up an in running lay of something like £24 Million for Voler @27 or so , even though it looked a likely winner most of the race

Obviously everyone watching could see it was incredible value but there was so much money there that only about 1.5M was taken i think . so it was still 27 as it crossed the line

The layer did not have £24 million in his account or even enough to cover the bets that were placed.  Actually don't think he even had a grand in here .

It was some kind of IT screw up .The lay never really existed as it was not backed by real money . Betfair voided and a lot of people were seething  . Personally i can;t see why they really expected to get paid . Though it did raise the issue of how you can be certain that your matched bet is 'real' so was a problem for Betfair PR wise as had a lot of publicity .
By:
tobermory
When: 02 May 14 02:57
of course 20 odd million was the amount people could stake so the red figure on the punters screen would have been something like £700,000,000 if it had all been matched and probably about 30 odd million with what was matched

Biggest ever meltdown on horse forum
By:
tobermory
When: 02 May 14 03:11
this was the in running thread

http://community.betfair.com/horse_racing/go/thread/view/94102/28800603/21m-lay?pg=1
By:
iprefertolay
When: 02 May 14 18:17
thanks tobermory.
By:
kincsem
When: 02 May 14 20:17
This isn't a hard luck story.

In the 2002 World Cup the USA were beating Portugal 3-1.  At about 70 minutes into the match a USA win was 4/11.
So I took a deep breath, phoned up the bookies, and had the biggest bet of my life, €1,100 to win €400.
When I put the phone down and looked at the screen.  Jeff Agoos of the USA immediately scored a brilliant own goal.  Facing his goal (!) he hit a volley from about 12 yards that Brad Friedel never saw.
I sweated the remaining twenty minutes as Portugal battered the USA looking for an equalizer.  It ended 3-2.
The USA with 4 points eventually went through from Group D to the last 16. Portugal ended the group stages with 3 points.

Check here for one of the best own goals ever (from 13:00).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1rX1bbTaJ40
By:
iprefertolay
When: 05 May 14 22:26
Crystal Palace v Liverpool   05/5/2014
Liverpool needed to win going for title.
Palace nothing to play for in mid table.
In running Liverpool 3 nil up,Liverpool win matched at 1.01 for £340,829
Draw backed at 999/1

Result 3-3

Lots of fingures burnt especially 1.01 backers or 999/1 layers
By:
mesmerised
When: 12 May 14 00:29
Very enjoyable read this thread. Not for sadistic reasons mind.

Four people today stood the change of winning and sharing the £250,000 from a free bet on Sky sport Super 6 competition, they all had all 6 correct scores up until the 94th when Fulham equalised against Palace, 62.5k down the drain. Now that is gutting.
By:
iprefertolay
When: 12 May 14 17:58
World Championship Snooker, April 2014.
Ronnie O`Sullivan v Mark Selby.
Ronnie going for his sixth World title and third consequetive win.
Selby yet to win the World crown.
O`Sullivan leads by ten frames to five, and trades to back at 1.05.
Surely it was a forgone conclusion as Selby could be backed at 20/1.

Result.... Selby won with four frames to spare!

On this day which I call mad Monday, three apparent sure fire winners all lost, with in running prices backed as follows >

O`Sullivan 1.05, Liverpool 1.01 and Valencia 1.02

The lesson here is that their is never ever a certainty, whatever the sport or event.
By:
iprefertolay
When: 14 May 14 18:50
Horse Racing, 16/05/14 Killarney 20.25pm
Artic Fire the odds on fav was matched in running at 1.01 as it lead by a length well inside the final furlong.
Shu Lewis who was backed in running at 130/1 came with a late run for a photo finish.
Betfair traders on photo finishes seldom get it wrong and Artic Fire was trading at 1.2 but drifted alarmingly to 1.5

Shu Lewis won by a nose.

I backed Artic Fire post race not for a lot but im sure many had their fingurs burnt.
By:
Northbouy
When: 14 May 14 19:41
is your calendar wrong mate Confused
By:
iprefertolay
When: 14 May 14 20:20
sorry  13th apologies.
By:
JRClark
When: 14 May 14 22:11
Worst for me, Big Bucks, Annie Power Chelts 2014. For weeks Id been telling people people lay BB and AP, i think BB was around 4/1 and AP I think was near enough odds on so not a massive out lay., BB was never going to win as fitness was no where near 100% as people believed, and AP was not proven over distance. Previous to the start of the days racing I placed L63 on various other horses (Id have to check back previous bets to see who as names don't stick in my head easily). Every time I told someone to lay either BB or AP they completely disagreed with me. Mean while a friend of mine, who develops systems in picking winners, had told the group I'm part of that More Of That (i think) was the clear winner and should back it at around 15/2. So guess who I backed as part of my multi? Thats right Annie Power, not big buck who was proven over distance and going or MOT who I was told had a brilliant chance, but AP. At this point my cash out was around £330 on a £12.60 stake, I decided that everyone, bar my friend, was adamant AP wouldn't be beat, so though "let the bet run". Think you know the rest MOT won at about 15/2, AP 2nd at evens or odds on, (can't rememberer) and I think BB was 4th. Other 2 horses placed so 2 winners and 3 places gave me a return, but only a third of what I should of cashed out on had I of listened to myself. Plus theres the 12/15 on the coral football jackpot at its biggest rollover and a few other bets I should of laid off or cashed out, but wines going to my head, so I'm offski.
By:
One Barry Robson
When: 14 May 14 23:43
Lost 6.5k in less than two weeks - backed o'sullivan, laying correct scores, backed wrong tennis players when it is a 50/50 shout, backed benefica, backed spurs @ west ham, backed south american football staying up until 4am in the process. Totally totally pissed off. I'l never recoup that amount. It's gone and I'm not even going to attempt to claw it back. It's done and I've been taught a lesson in chasing and this day was always going to come. I now need to learn to just watch sport without the thrill of the bet - it may be dull but at least I wont have the stress and anquish when it goes wrong. This is a massive amount of money for anybody and especially me.
By:
Northbouy
When: 15 May 14 17:23
I feel your pain OBR. I stick to level stakes these days, so even though I might bet on rubbish I have no idea about trying to get back my loses, it stops me from doing my bollocks in one session.
By:
One Barry Robson
When: 15 May 14 19:14
I've no idea how to do this.
By:
iprefertolay
When: 15 May 14 19:19
Your not the only one OBR, ive bet far more than I can afford to lose as many do.
Ive backed a horse on US racing in the early hours when I should have been in bed for a grand at odds on, it lost.
The other losses id rather not go into.
By:
One Barry Robson
When: 15 May 14 19:26
but you still gamble? My question is how can people watch sport without the thrill of a bet? I can't imagine that - especially if it wasn't my team playing.
By:
iprefertolay
When: 15 May 14 19:57
OBR, ive learnt the only way to win is arbing, but its only small beer,but wins nether the less.
You have to be disciplined which im not.
If I had stuck to arbing I would be an extremely rich man.
By:
One Barry Robson
When: 15 May 14 20:38
But arbing is risk free so what's the point in watching the match as the outcome is not relevant?
By:
One Barry Robson
When: 15 May 14 20:39
I think I need to know how to stop and enjoy any tennis match or football match for the spectacle it is.
By:
iprefertolay
When: 15 May 14 20:54
ORB,you obviously need a buzz watching sports.
I get a buzz finding arbs,but it will never recover what ive lost.
A tip for you keep your bets small and dont chase losses, otherwise,its the sure fire way to the workhouse.
By:
One Barry Robson
When: 15 May 14 21:06
I found that too time consuming - I've done that before. I am not disciplined to keep them small. Maybe I need speculative bets to be placed to win big and that way if they win I'm happy and if they lose i don't lose much.
By:
Rob_The_Bantam
When: 15 May 14 23:22
Sounds like you just need to pack in gambling and use your money for something else.  If you can't enjoy sport without a bet, don't watch it and don't bet on it.  If you're happy throwing your money away, then fine, it's your choice, but you don't sound happy with it so surely there must be other things more deserving of your time and money?
By:
JRClark
When: 16 May 14 09:38
I'm assuming arbing is trading?? if so I watch the match/race to know when to lay off my back bet. Never get emotionally involved with anything, have my stop loses set, my position to trade out to win set. Once I've made the money turn TV off. If your going to get emotionally involved in the game don't bet, it will only lead to upset. (unless of course you win, but which case you can't always win).
By:
iprefertolay
When: 22 May 14 20:57
Premier League Darts 22/05/14 P.Taylor v Raymond van Barnevald semi final.
Sixteen time champion of the world, Taylor had never lost to Barnevald in the premier league on twenty one previous matches.
Taylor lead four legs to one, and traded at 1.04 to back,whist Barnevald traded at 20/1.

Result Barnevald 8 Taylor 5

bad day for the backers at 1.04
By:
Rob_The_Bantam
When: 22 May 14 22:26
iprefertolay: these aren't hard luck stories, they're just stories about short odds gubbings, which happen daily.
By:
iprefertolay
When: 23 May 14 01:06
Seeing these backers getting gubbed at rediculous prices is better than having sex.
By:
mikenz
When: 23 May 14 13:38

May 23, 2014 -- 1:06AM, iprefertolay wrote:


Seeing these backers getting gubbed at rediculous prices is better than having sex.


Really.?

By:
iprefertolay
When: 23 May 14 17:22
very much so...milkenz
By:
U.A.
When: 24 May 14 13:04
That you get more satisfaction from seeing the misfortune of complete strangers than positive experiences that you personally have is a very sad reflection on you.
By:
Capt__F
When: 25 May 14 00:02
older u get harder to get up
By:
Night Sight
When: 25 May 14 22:42
F.A. Cup day 1989 and no racing on T.V.

I usually did a Lucky 15 every Saturday on the T.V. races in those days so I decided to do a £1 one line placepot at Newbury instead for a bit of an interest.

Brought up the Teletext after the match to check how it went,not really expecting anything.

First two won or placed and the third was a NR but the favourite placed followed by places in legs 4 & 5

Last race was a 20 runner 3yo handicap and my horse was You Missed Me @8/1

Didn't make the frame(12/1 was the lowest price in the first four places).Naturally I was disappointed but then again it was only a quid.Forgot all about it and headed out to the pub.

I then made the mistake of going into the bookies at lunch time on Monday to look up the Sporting Life to see where You Missed Me finished.

It was beaten a neck into 5th after being hampered (RP online doesn't mention this though).

Placepot paid £1262.One of the two bookies I used at the time paid a 10% consolation if your last leg let you down.

I did my placepot in the other one.Cry
By:
timbuctooth
When: 28 May 14 18:38
I`m an indie, so have innumerable tales of luck, both good and bad. There are, however, two particular examples of bad luck that stand out. Both involved an uncannily similar set of circumstances, without which, they would be in the `good luck` stories folder!

The first, and smaller, of the two involved that infamous rick by the Sporing Index boys, when pricing up the number of `wides in the 1999 Cricket World Cup. I think it was Paul Kealy, writing in the RP, who suggested that the opening quote of (from memory, something like) 270-280 had been calculated using the wrong assumptions. Perhaps that the compiler had based his figures on the 5-day game, which bore no real relevance to the tournament in question.

So convincing was the article, so little apparent downside, that I decided to have a decent crack at it, I rang another local indie with whom I had done loads of business and who was also a good friend, to have a buy at the 280, £100 a point. I asked him if he had seen the article, (don`t forget, these were pre-internet days). He hadn`t, but said he would, and call me back soon. Which he didn`t. Next day, I called him again. He had seen the article and, as I had asked to buy at 280, he felt honour-bound to accept it, even though the quote had now risen to (again from memory, something like) 300-310..As his friend, I appreciated his offer, but couldn`t do it to him. After all, no bet had actually been struck the day before, at the 280. I don`t remember the rest of the conversation, but, for some unknown reason, I ended up having no bet.

Only to see the quote go to, from memory, 1200? Before finally making up at something like 970. 70-odd grand, if only my man had seen the article.








Second story, which really is `the one that got away`.



Many of you will remember that, about 10 years ago, in a big publicity stunt, Fred Done offered an even-money, £1,000,000 bet: which of Man Utd or Chelsea would finish higher in the forthcoming Premiership season. No big deal, you might think, except for the fact that Chelsea were only 4/6 to win the Premiership. ( I`m not entirely sure if it was 4/7 or 4/6, so I will assume it was the less extreme figure.)

So, 4/6 to beat 19 teams INCLUDING Man U, or even money, and only have to beat United? The problem was that Done wanted the bet to be taken by one person, not a syndicate or anonymous company. That wouldn`t provide the publicity in the same way that having a million pound bet with some Joe Soap would. Fred was on tv for three or four days, bemoaning the lack of a challenger, before I had an idea.

For some reason, on that particular day, I didn`t have a million sitting in my back pocket, but I knew a man who would have. He is one of the biggest private bookies in Britain, and many of you will know him. I rang him. but he was out. I asked his son if his father had seen the offer. He suspected not, (again, pre-internet).

Next day, the father rings me, saying he had now seen the challenge, but that he didn`t want to take up the offer, as the last thing he needed was the tax man discovering that he had a million in cash lying around, he had to stay low-key.

I had no such concerns, so offered to do it for him, to be `the face` of the bet. He agreed, and so I, by now very excitedly, rang Fred`s number. I`ve forgotten the name of his right-hand-man who I spoke to, but he told me that after something like five days having passed with no challengers, one had turned up just 30 minutes ago, and Fred was in the process of finalising the bet with him. But that if, for whatever reason, the other challenger didn`t pursue it, Fred would call me straight back.
Three or four hours later, I received a call confirming the offer had been taken. I was 30 minutes, out of FIVE DAYS, late. Turned out that Fred had got fed up waiting five days for a Joe Soap to take the bet, had relaxed his previous conditions, and had made the bet with Victor.
I asked him if Fred would care for a second million pound bet, but the next day I received a call saying `thanks, but one million is enough for Fred`.


Chelsea romped it. If only my man had seen the challenge a few minutes earlier...
Page 3 of 3  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com