|
By:
couldn't sum it up much better myself....betfair is no longer a betting exchange with punters interests at heart..it's trying to very clearly become a jack of all trades would be sport book yet failing on all counts miserably
turn the lights off.... |
|
By:
They are actually worse than the rats they set out to take on.
|
|
By:
to be finished no other way for a plc that has to be licensed can go, the defamatory posts its only a matter of time before a twitter esk court case would not be good news
|
|
By:
The management at Betfair will all but ruin the company, they're clueless with no vision and can't see further than the next quarterly profits.
Betfair used to be a company that had a fanatical loyal customer base but now their customers hate them. From the Premium Charge to putting the exchange on a back seat by offering their own sportsbook to virtual games. They want to use the exchange which is their only original and innovative idea to promote the usual rubbish that every other bookmaker does so they can become just like everyone of their competitors. The exchange idea has been created and is here to stay. It might take 50 years but with the internet making the world a very small place at some point there will be a huge exchange that anyone who wants a bet goes through. It's highly unlikely that the company will be Betfair. History is littered with companies that had a great original idea but lacked vision. It's like Microsoft taking the original idea off someone else but with some vision and creativity taking all the spoils for themselves. |
|
By:
Ridiculous post.
|
|
By:
1.01 landed again
|
|
By:
It says a lot they used to regularly ban people for dissent, whereas now posts like GandalfTheGrey's and Get on MASSIVE's are just up there for good now.
Betfair wants to be like Bet365 or Paddy Power - much higher profits, just watching the cash roll in. There are two models in bookmaking - hire traders, then set prices and restrict winners, or save the expense of hiring traders, let customers bet against themselves, and the cost of hiring traders becomes the cost of winners taking money out of the ecosystem. Unfortunately, the winners are probably now too sophisticated, and Betfair are making the decision it would be preferable to hire a team of traders and restrict people instead. |
|
By:
agree with that..how long did it take them to ban feck n eejit? he slagged them off on a daily basis..not exactly sure what the straw was that broke the camels back though
|
|
By:
Feck?
Wasn't he the one who was the ultimate class warrior? The one with a chip on his shoulder so large that his kidney's were partly on display? |
|
By:
not sure, you could be right, i just remember his constant anti betfair tirades
|
|
By:
If its the same guy I remember, he seemed to be anti everything!
He especially despised (I don't think that word is strong enough though) traders on the exchange. He kept suggesting that BF withheld the liquidity from screens, in other words, a "black box" type of exchange, at least for certain markets anyway. |
|
By:
no loss, imo. his pea-brained rants against traders were so unutterably boring.
|
|
By:
and his idea that the way forward was to hide prices from punters was the product of an addled mind.
|
|
By:
was Feck a drunken scot?
I seem to remember he was pretty clued up on API's etc... and all things betting |
|
By:
feck n eejit is an irish saying so i presume he was irish
he was also an alright fella imo |
|
By:
i liked feck.
if you get past the initial impression of a militant loon, he frequently made a lot of sense. and whilst he was scattergun in his hatred of what he thought constituted "trading" he made a lot of very valid points i. traders are not the primary source of liquidity. ii. the commission structure is hugely in favour of traders, despite their not being the primary source of liquidity. iii. the in play delay in many cases favours those with the quickest information rather than helping those behind a delay. no delay might be fairer. |
|
By:
I endorse the last post.
|
|
By:
What dumfounds me is that internal innovation was quarterly for five years. And I still feel that the exchasnge is still not completed to its fullest, a platform that could earn more accolades is srill achievable.
A company is aloud to change and customers will come and go. But the pie in this sector is shrinking and the competition for each pound/bet is fierce. Offers require a slide rule now, most unachievable. Customer loyalty should be the priority of any company right now. Serious traders use api so any changes to the platform mean nothing to liquidity. If betfair have no interest in their trading platform, then fund the api teams like gruss, etc, to take the technology further. Meanwhile, there is a world beyond betfair and the forums are out there with excellent banter. |
|
By:
Dstyle, iii. would be a death blow for football liquidity where people are already adequately protected. Although it could work with a complete overhaul of the system, where bets are voided when goals are scored quickly after bet placement (as Asian bookies do). I think the current system works ok though, so no need for that.
Might work for other sports though. |
|
By:
agreed Investor. sports where there are lots of small outcome influencing events occurring in a short space of time might work better with no delay (tennis, darts, snooker)
my post was actually more a general defense of Feck who made some pretty leftfield suggestions which he was pilloried for, but there was often some very solid thinking behind them. |
|
By:
one benefit of binning the forum will be that canutes like that wanchor^ above wont be able to publicise the total bollox they come up with. good roddance. and feck n eejit was precisely that. no irony involved
|
|
By:
For what its worth, I never had a problem with Feck's intelligence, it was the wave after wave of dogma spouting from his posts that was so exasperating and wearying.
|