Hull favourite over Burnley(h)

I was a bit dubious about backing hull, but i'm BAWDEEP now i know you fancy the clarets.

Why do you think that ken hull are third aren't they?

Match odds are a no-go with this game, both are poor against teams in top half.
Surprised at hull given the high league placing.
Hull are 3-1-6 away against top half sides,and 5-2-1 away against lower half teams.
No way favs, despite Burnley being average.

smithy91 Joined: 01 Mar 10
Replies: 4668 11 Mar 13 16:08   


Why do you think that ken hull are third aren't they?

Hull are indeed third. Do you think I am wrong?

Hull are the best team I've seen at Vicarage Road this season, they comfortably beat Watford. I would definitely have them favourites.

yes i thought the odds were fair when i saw them. i work with a lot of burnley fans and follow their results etc. with the league standings i expected hull to be around 2.7. they have been backed in slightly to!

Are you backing them?

i've backed them at 2.74 but only got about £180 matched unfortunately i've traded that out at 2.66. i'm going to watch the opening stages before betting becuase i can't rule burnley out either. on their day they are not to bad!

burnley 2.96 into 2.84 seems you were right ken!

Right about what? I didn't say they would shorten.

isnt hulls top scorer injured? Aluko or whatever his name is

well the prices are supposed to be most accurate at kickoff aren't they and burnley shortened quite a bit to come closer to your odds

Smithy.. i dont know why you bother he could cause an argument in an empty room.

well Hull have scored, first time they have managed that in their last 4 visits to Burnley. I know it is aftertiming and all that but I would have expected the win odds for both to be pretty close.

Gueeser (NAP)

LOL supernap, you could get anything beat couldn't you??

nortons-Smithy.. i dont know why you bother he could cause an argument in an empty room.

nortons whats your thoughts on barca tommorow do you think they will get backed in?

smithy how did the 1-1 trade go?

it went well thanks sweet i got £800 matched at 7.6 and layed off at 7.4 it was well backed at kickoff. made £170 on the game itself from laying burnley before half time when they were favourites which i disagreed with hull were shading it

the 1-1 had all the criteria attached, it reduces a lot more often than not and if it doesnt, 99 times out of 100 you can scratch for no loss...again only if all the conditions are matched

Yeah and unders came in a lot which helped also. I should of really backed it earlier this morning to get more matched. Will look at trading this more in future :)

Well played the Hull backers. Me? I didn't have a bet.

Phew!

Shocking aftertiming on this thread.

By who?

everyone

Be specific.

Seems he must have been talking about Smithy91.

you are also guilty this time

Thought burnley were too big a price, but didn't have a bet

You couldn't make it up

Show me where.

i didn't see the game, besides the betting was as it should
have been, although you might not understand that.

An hour after the event declaring a no bet. Thread title obviously implied you were having a bet. Don't know why I'm getting involved but I found it funny the aftertiming policeman guilty of aftertiming.

I gave my opinion on the betting, not the result. You are
correct about wondering why you are getting involved as you
appear to have difficulty understanding the English language.

You truly are the gift that keep on giving supernap

Hull favourite over Burnley (h)
should be the other way imo

and then after you've been proved wrong (again)

the betting was as it should be.

But hey, you didn't have a bet so

You are rightee Ken Iza forgettin my English for I quit me country

Lol I clearly stated at the beginning of the thread that I was watching the opening stages before punting ! Im such an aftertimer :)

Smithy, As you didn't claim any particular bet, but won a sum
of money, then I suppose you must be seen as after timing.
The only thing you have done wrong is posting on the wrong thread.

another fantastic call by kenny,and to be fair to those who think he may have had a bet he's got a history of forgetting to put his bets on,but he's on a roll at the moment, sheff utd banker v hartlepool 1.33ish (Doh) and now this  - he's nothing if not consistent !

green army, you don't understand betting, besides you are on the
wrong thread, a thread I have stayed away from. Would you like me
back?

for sure, we need a new jester after the other clown got banned

Ken needs to go in the studio with Roy Keane. Forget the game we will just watch these two bickering all game.

That would be great wouldn't it?

Kenilworth: Black is white
Keane: No mate, black is black
kenilworth: that's what I said

Green Army, you only pop up when I 'tip' a loser.
Last Thursday I tipped Newcastle to get a 0-0, how
come you never noticed that?

i supposed you backed that one 

Sorry Smithy been at Cheltenham all day..wished i had stayed at home!

kenny you little aftertimer, come on over and join the party, and anyway no-one can "tip" a 0-0, you can say the odds for that score are value ,but "tipping" 0-0 is like tipping a dice to roll consecutive sixes, a ridculous claim

No probs nortons barca did come in abit. What happened to you at cheltenham mate? :(

"What happened to you at cheltenham mate? :( "

Spot the 'I don't have a clue about nags' forumite. He probably just got fed up by 50k people dressed in green singing Ruby Ruby Ruby Ruby all afternoon ;-)

Anyone can 'tip' anything, including 0-0's, and they can
also highlight 'wrong' prices, I do the latter. If you want
to highlight my Burnley price as a 'tip' when I clearly
mentioned only the price as being 'big' then my 0-0 suggest
is valid, you can't have it both ways.
BTW I also backed Everton v Wigan to finish 0-3 going into
the scond half on Saturday, but I don't suppose you saw that
either. You really are an ignoramus.

The difference being supernap, that he doesn't claim to be some kind of punting guru.

He's not a punter at all. He just scavenges pennies off prices,
laying at 8.2, backing at 8.4, greening up for a couple of pounds
here and there...thinks it's clever.lol.

its called trading kenilworth, are you really that thick? would you rather he did as you do and start threads tipping long odds on? which to be fair you have a lousy recent record with

its called trading kenilworth, are you really that thick? would you rather he did as you do and start threads tipping long odds on? which to be fair you have a lousy recent record with

He is not a punter at all....this from someone who was dismayed last week that his £2 at 1.55 on some football team was unmatched.

nortons, another one who doesn't realise when someone is taking the p!ss !

Sweetchildofmine, you call it trading, I call it scavenging.

okay cheers ken..''traders are scavengers'' anymore pearls of wisdom mister perfect???

Of course your taking the piss.....i for one have never believed you once were an ex bookmaker,but thanks for coming clean.

nortons i think you misread his post, kenny was a bootmaker, you don't think he could run a betting shop, he would forget to lay the bets off and put all the cash on his naps, like sheff utd 1.33 v hartlepool - whoops

(Just a laugh from a crying clown).

Just cant see how he made a living...would probably only offer prices on live matches which in his day would have been one... the F A Cup Final

there's a reason he's an ex-bookmaker