|
By:
I was a bit dubious about backing hull, but i'm BAWDEEP now i know you fancy the clarets.
|
|
By:
Why do you think that ken hull are third aren't they?
|
|
By:
Match odds are a no-go with this game, both are poor against teams in top half.
Surprised at hull given the high league placing. Hull are 3-1-6 away against top half sides,and 5-2-1 away against lower half teams. No way favs, despite Burnley being average. |
|
By:
smithy91 Joined: 01 Mar 10
Replies: 4668 11 Mar 13 16:08 Why do you think that ken hull are third aren't they? Hull are indeed third. Do you think I am wrong? |
|
By:
Hull are the best team I've seen at Vicarage Road this season, they comfortably beat Watford. I would definitely have them favourites.
|
|
By:
yes i thought the odds were fair when i saw them. i work with a lot of burnley fans and follow their results etc. with the league standings i expected hull to be around 2.7. they have been backed in slightly to!
|
|
By:
Are you backing them?
|
|
By:
i've backed them at 2.74 but only got about £180 matched unfortunately i've traded that out at 2.66. i'm going to watch the opening stages before betting becuase i can't rule burnley out either. on their day they are not to bad!
|
|
By:
burnley 2.96 into 2.84 seems you were right ken!
|
|
By:
Right about what? I didn't say they would shorten.
|
|
By:
isnt hulls top scorer injured? Aluko or whatever his name is
|
|
By:
well the prices are supposed to be most accurate at kickoff aren't they and burnley shortened quite a bit to come closer to your odds
![]() |
|
By:
Smithy.. i dont know why you bother he could cause an argument in an empty room.
|
|
By:
well Hull have scored, first time they have managed that in their last 4 visits to Burnley. I know it is aftertiming and all that but I would have expected the win odds for both to be pretty close.
|
|
By:
Gueeser (NAP)
|
|
By:
LOL supernap, you could get anything beat couldn't you??
|
|
By:
nortons-Smithy.. i dont know why you bother he could cause an argument in an empty room.
![]() nortons whats your thoughts on barca tommorow do you think they will get backed in? |
|
By:
smithy how did the 1-1 trade go?
|
|
By:
it went well thanks sweet i got £800 matched at 7.6 and layed off at 7.4 it was well backed at kickoff. made £170 on the game itself from laying burnley before half time when they were favourites which i disagreed with hull were shading it
![]() |
|
By:
the 1-1 had all the criteria attached, it reduces a lot more often than not and if it doesnt, 99 times out of 100 you can scratch for no loss...again only if all the conditions are matched
|
|
By:
Yeah and unders came in a lot which helped also. I should of really backed it earlier this morning to get more matched. Will look at trading this more in future :)
|
|
By:
Well played the Hull backers. Me? I didn't have a bet.
|
|
By:
Phew!
|
|
By:
Shocking aftertiming on this thread.
|
|
By:
By who?
|
|
By:
everyone
![]() |
|
By:
Be specific.
|
|
By:
Seems he must have been talking about Smithy91.
|
|
By:
you are also guilty this time
|
|
By:
Thought burnley were too big a price, but didn't have a bet
![]() You couldn't make it up |
|
By:
Show me where.
|
|
By:
i didn't see the game, besides the betting was as it should
have been, although you might not understand that. |
|
By:
An hour after the event declaring a no bet. Thread title obviously implied you were having a bet. Don't know why I'm getting involved but I found it funny the aftertiming policeman guilty of aftertiming.
|
|
By:
I gave my opinion on the betting, not the result. You are
correct about wondering why you are getting involved as you appear to have difficulty understanding the English language. |
|
By:
You truly are the gift that keep on giving supernap
Hull favourite over Burnley (h) should be the other way imo and then after you've been proved wrong (again) the betting was as it should be. But hey, you didn't have a bet so ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
By:
You are rightee Ken Iza forgettin my English for I quit me country
|
|
By:
Lol I clearly stated at the beginning of the thread that I was watching the opening stages before punting ! Im such an aftertimer :)
|
|
By:
Smithy, As you didn't claim any particular bet, but won a sum
of money, then I suppose you must be seen as after timing. The only thing you have done wrong is posting on the wrong thread. |
|
By:
another fantastic call by kenny,and to be fair to those who think he may have had a bet he's got a history of forgetting to put his bets on,but he's on a roll at the moment, sheff utd banker v hartlepool 1.33ish (Doh) and now this - he's nothing if not consistent !
|