Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
kenilworth
11 Mar 13 12:55
Joined:
Date Joined: 04 Nov 05
| Topic/replies: 15,627 | Blogger: kenilworth's blog
Should be the other way IMO

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 66
By:
jed.davison
When: 11 Mar 13 16:05
I was a bit dubious about backing hull, but i'm BAWDEEP now i know you fancy the clarets.
By:
smithy91
When: 11 Mar 13 17:08
Why do you think that ken hull are third aren't they?
By:
cloughandtaylor
When: 11 Mar 13 18:37
Match odds are a no-go with this game, both are poor against teams in top half.
Surprised at hull given the high league placing.
Hull are 3-1-6 away against top half sides,and 5-2-1 away against lower half teams.
No way favs, despite Burnley being average.
By:
kenilworth
When: 11 Mar 13 19:20
smithy91 Joined: 01 Mar 10
Replies: 4668 11 Mar 13 16:08   


Why do you think that ken hull are third aren't they?


Hull are indeed third. Do you think I am wrong?
By:
Francis Benali
When: 11 Mar 13 20:01
Hull are the best team I've seen at Vicarage Road this season, they comfortably beat Watford. I would definitely have them favourites.
By:
smithy91
When: 11 Mar 13 20:02
yes i thought the odds were fair when i saw them. i work with a lot of burnley fans and follow their results etc. with the league standings i expected hull to be around 2.7. they have been backed in slightly to!
By:
kenilworth
When: 11 Mar 13 20:03
Are you backing them?
By:
smithy91
When: 11 Mar 13 20:08
i've backed them at 2.74 but only got about £180 matched unfortunately i've traded that out at 2.66. i'm going to watch the opening stages before betting becuase i can't rule burnley out either. on their day they are not to bad!
By:
smithy91
When: 11 Mar 13 20:17
burnley 2.96 into 2.84 seems you were right ken!
By:
kenilworth
When: 11 Mar 13 20:31
Right about what? I didn't say they would shorten.
By:
subversion
When: 11 Mar 13 20:35
isnt hulls top scorer injured? Aluko or whatever his name is
By:
smithy91
When: 11 Mar 13 21:35
well the prices are supposed to be most accurate at kickoff aren't they and burnley shortened quite a bit to come closer to your oddsConfused
By:
nortons
When: 11 Mar 13 21:51
Smithy.. i dont know why you bother he could cause an argument in an empty room.
By:
Burton-Brewers
When: 11 Mar 13 22:14
well Hull have scored, first time they have managed that in their last 4 visits to Burnley. I know it is aftertiming and all that but I would have expected the win odds for both to be pretty close.
By:
jed.davison
When: 11 Mar 13 22:32
Gueeser (NAP)
By:
jed.davison
When: 11 Mar 13 22:39
LOL supernap, you could get anything beat couldn't you??
By:
smithy91
When: 11 Mar 13 22:46
nortons-Smithy.. i dont know why you bother he could cause an argument in an empty room.Laugh

nortons whats your thoughts on barca tommorow do you think they will get backed in?
By:
sweetchildofmine
When: 11 Mar 13 22:47
smithy how did the 1-1 trade go?
By:
smithy91
When: 11 Mar 13 22:53
it went well thanks sweet i got £800 matched at 7.6 and layed off at 7.4 it was well backed at kickoff. made £170 on the game itself from laying burnley before half time when they were favourites which i disagreed with hull were shading itHappy
By:
sweetchildofmine
When: 11 Mar 13 22:56
the 1-1 had all the criteria attached, it reduces a lot more often than not and if it doesnt, 99 times out of 100 you can scratch for no loss...again only if all the conditions are matched
By:
smithy91
When: 11 Mar 13 23:15
Yeah and unders came in a lot which helped also. I should of really backed it earlier this morning to get more matched. Will look at trading this more in future :)
By:
kenilworth
When: 12 Mar 13 00:06
Well played the Hull backers. Me? I didn't have a bet.
By:
jed.davison
When: 12 Mar 13 00:14
Phew!
By:
I.quit.my.country
When: 12 Mar 13 00:17
Shocking aftertiming on this thread.
By:
kenilworth
When: 12 Mar 13 00:18
By who?
By:
I.quit.my.country
When: 12 Mar 13 00:19
everyone Grin
By:
kenilworth
When: 12 Mar 13 00:28
Be specific.
By:
kenilworth
When: 12 Mar 13 00:33
Seems he must have been talking about Smithy91.
By:
I.quit.my.country
When: 12 Mar 13 00:35
you are also guilty this time
By:
jed.davison
When: 12 Mar 13 00:36
Thought burnley were too big a price, but didn't have a bet Laugh

You couldn't make it up
By:
kenilworth
When: 12 Mar 13 00:36
Show me where.
By:
kenilworth
When: 12 Mar 13 00:38
i didn't see the game, besides the betting was as it should
have been, although you might not understand that.
By:
I.quit.my.country
When: 12 Mar 13 00:40
An hour after the event declaring a no bet. Thread title obviously implied you were having a bet. Don't know why I'm getting involved but I found it funny the aftertiming policeman guilty of aftertiming.
By:
kenilworth
When: 12 Mar 13 00:55
I gave my opinion on the betting, not the result. You are
correct about wondering why you are getting involved as you
appear to have difficulty understanding the English language.
By:
jed.davison
When: 12 Mar 13 01:00
You truly are the gift that keep on giving supernap

Hull favourite over Burnley (h)
should be the other way imo


and then after you've been proved wrong (again)

the betting was as it should be.

But hey, you didn't have a bet so LaughLaughLaugh
By:
I.quit.my.country
When: 12 Mar 13 01:05
You are rightee Ken Iza forgettin my English for I quit me country
By:
smithy91
When: 12 Mar 13 08:22
Lol I clearly stated at the beginning of the thread that I was watching the opening stages before punting ! Im such an aftertimer :)
By:
kenilworth
When: 12 Mar 13 08:52
Smithy, As you didn't claim any particular bet, but won a sum
of money, then I suppose you must be seen as after timing.
The only thing you have done wrong is posting on the wrong thread.
By:
green army
When: 12 Mar 13 09:24
another fantastic call by kenny,and to be fair to those who think he may have had a bet he's got a history of forgetting to put his bets on,but he's on a roll at the moment, sheff utd banker v hartlepool 1.33ish (Doh) and now this  - he's nothing if not consistent !
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com