|
By:
Nice work Artisan. Wish I could help with that, sounds like a fascinating project!
|
|
By:
it is amazing how far people go to win
![]() . good luck with ur problem |
|
By:
Predator would have done well at horse racing
![]() ![]() ![]() how large is the equipment... also what is the level of temperature you are looking for to decide if the horse wins or fades... how effective it is compared to watching horses in paddock and see if they are sweating? sounds like oil sands ... good in theory difficult / costly to implement... |
|
By:
The equipment's not too bad - reasonable quality IR camera (or modified and filtered standard as a starter) connected to a laptop which automatically processes the images in real time. There's some pattern recognition software running which has been trained on previous images and data to forecast likely outcome.
I don't know how it compares to looking at horses in the paddock, although I've tried various things from the off. The most effective I find is in the last few furlongs (depending on the length of the race) when a horse goes sub say 2.0 depending on it's temperature (and on what's around it) my system either automatically backs or lays. The edge is around 30%. No other systems I've played with over the years has got remotely close to that. So it definitely works, and an average day out will more than cover the costs of the initial outlay on the kit, although there has been a great deal of work getting the right camera set up, the pattern recognition software tuned, and you need to gather some history to be able to do that. |
|
By:
and the race courses are ok with you using this equipment.. 30% is very good edge..
|
|
By:
I don't advertise what I'm doing at courses. Although I need a laptop/notebook with a dongle - I need a good mobile connection - I don't wonder around with it open, so I guess I just look like a guy with a camera. Never had anyone question me.
|
|
By:
I am nominating this as thread of the year !
A 30% edge on 2.00 is fantastic! Question? From snap to back/lay decision, how much time elapses? |
|
By:
Wow, a 30% edge is impressive and if you can cover the cost of the hardware in a single day why don't you hire someone to sit at each race track for you?
I'm sure that given the economy you could get someone at a reasonable rate, they don't have to know how much profit you make from the research you've done. You could set up the notebook so that it sends you the data and they don't see the trading decision. Would it be even less conspicuous and perhaps cheaper to have your pattern recognition software running on a tablet? |
|
By:
Ah yes we certainly have come a long way since backing the horse that has a dump in the parade ring.
|
|
By:
Very impressive. Does it work for both flat and jumps? So you're looking for people to go to the course and then split the profits with? I'd be willing to give it a go if the number were right. I'd be able to do the south of england.
|
|
By:
how obvious would it be though if you wonder around with a camera aimed at the race and a laptop on ya lap,
youd be noticed quite quickly and throw out surely? |
|
By:
Who is Shirley ?
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Can't give too much away but here's an image from my 'Hot Jockey In Running' software. For obvious reasons, I cannot reveal the temperature scale.[/size]
![]() |
|
By:
I would like to know if this technology would be possible to be adapted for use in meeting suitable women for "a good night out " ?
|
|
By:
Learning to smell pheromones works better and you don't need the app.
|
|
By:
should be more concerned that in the front row there is a giant who is twice the height of every other spectator.
|
|
By:
Thin and Crispy |
|
By:
@Fine as frog hair ... the Saville method works well the colder the better !
|
|
By:
Interesting project. How are you identifying the runners in real time? I have it misclassifying about 1 horse in 1000 using replays when it has the whole race to build up a knowledge. I wouldnt like to use it for automated betting just using the closing stages in real time.
|