Forums

General Betting

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
These 56 comments are related to the topic:
My 30k misclick

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 56
By:
TheInvestor2
When: 17 Aug 12 00:27
Feck N. Eejit
Date Joined: 10 Jan 02
Add contact | Send message
When: 16 Aug 12 09:08
Joined:
Date Joined: 10 Jan 02
| Topic/replies: 7,753 | Blogger: Feck N. Eejit's blog
They could let you set your own level of bonkerism Trev.


Yes, although the point is that this protection is important for less sophisticated players who probably wouldn't set these levels anyway. If a guy comes on Betfair and finds it complicated, then making a mistake like that may see them leave, never to return again, sticking to traditional punting.

There is a problem with establishing floor prices. If a favourite in a football match is trading at 1.9 in play, I would be happy to have a huge amount up laying 1.7 in case someone makes a mistake (or is crazy enough to move the price that much). The problem is that I would get matched so infrequently, that it would not be worth my while. That's why trap bettors sit ridiculously far away from fair value; they have to make loads to compensate for getting nothing matched 99.x% of the time. I think trap betting is bad for the exchange because fun bettors will feel like they've been conned and leave.

In some of these cases Betfair could establish a floor. One way of doing this would be to take their own fixed odds bookie prices (with an increased margin), and use this as a floor to match silly bets against if the liquidity isn't there for the market itself to match it.  The good thing about that is that it would work if the exchange markets are relatively empty (meaning you can't get an idea of fair value by looking at market prices).
By:
Bayes.
When: 17 Aug 12 01:39
I think what I object to most is that these mistakes are only made possible because of Betfair's totally arbitrary two ladder system on two runner markets. My equivalent bet on a one ladder system (ie a lay of 1200 at 26.0) simply hits the first available back money and I lose the spread and perhaps a tick or two.
By:
Bayes.
When: 17 Aug 12 01:41
In other words why can't Betfair convert my 32k back at 1.04 into a far more sensible (given that the market is sub 1.1) lay of 1200 at 26.0
By:
Northbouy
When: 17 Aug 12 02:56
agree.  the only thing bonkers here is the OP.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 17 Aug 12 12:46
I don't think my idea would work ir anyway Investor but there could be a changeable pre-event default value for newbies. Agree with the floor idea in your post but it's a waste of time expecting this rancid mob to change anything.
By:
Contrarian2
When: 17 Aug 12 13:02
In some of these cases Betfair could establish a floor. One way of doing this would be to take their own fixed odds bookie prices (with an increased margin), and use this as a floor to match silly bets against if the liquidity isn't there for the market itself to match it

But that still wouldn't have worked in Bayes' case. As a previous poster mentioned, fair value in a tennis match would switch from 1.1 on player A to 1.1 player B in a couple of seconds if, say, player A suddenly suffered a serious injury. Betfair can't (I presume) be so active in their fixed odds market making that they would be able to respond to this sort of situation.
By:
TheInvestor2
When: 17 Aug 12 17:22
Yeah, it would only work if Betfair have odds up themselves.
By:
askari1
When: 17 Aug 12 17:40
At present they ask you to check if the odds are over 100, which I find a bit of a waste of time.

If they can do that, my feeling is that they should alert e.g. if your bet liability is 100 times more than yr average stake or if yr price requested is a certain multiple of the last matched price. These controls cd all be discretionary and user-side, like whether you want to see your profit net of commission or not.
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 17 Aug 12 19:56
Decades ago there was a tv drama about a girl band called the rock follies. At one point they stay with this porn king who's trying to get them to appear in a porn film. As he tells them the plot the follies look on horrified. When he's finished one of the girls asks "have you ever thought of making a film about straight sex". The porn king replies "We tried it once. We made a film about straight sex. We called it 'Straight Sex'. They stayed away in their droves. As far as I'm concerned, people who are into straight sex are all w@nkers".

I have this image in my head of a betfair big wig being asked if they've ever thought about having an interface that supports fair betting..............
By:
colonelll
When: 17 Aug 12 20:16
what is a straight sex?Confused
By:
TheVis
When: 17 Aug 12 21:44
He means no pre-amble, no pretence, no smoke and mirrors and cr*p background music.  Both parties just get straight down to business and both end up satisfied.
By:
Escobar.
When: 20 Aug 12 09:05
a phrase that springs to mind is

'a fool and his money are parted easily'
By:
Feck N. Eejit
When: 20 Aug 12 09:43
I always thought it was a fool and his mummy. Cry
By:
Bayes.
When: 20 Aug 12 22:06
I prefer the equally famous idiom

a lucky fool and his money are soon reunited
By:
chatlame
When: 20 Aug 12 22:31
Easier to buy toilet paper in the supermarket or take it from the job.
By:
the silverback
When: 21 Aug 12 22:25
Anyway, at least we've sorted out that Bayes is a big winner who chucks 30k at tennis match bets.
By:
no moves
When: 23 Aug 12 00:09
I wish i had had some of the 26's.GrinGrin
Page 2 of 2  •  Previous | 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com