General Betting
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
17 Apr 12
01:56
Joined:
Date Joined:
23 Jul 04
I am aware of Harville's work in this area,but find I am uncomfortable with the figures.
e.g 4/1defeats 9/1=39/1
whilst 9/1 defeats 4/1 = 44/1
seems the difference in 'real' terms is not great enough.
Does anyone have a table that skews the weight more in the favour of the more popular result?
or am i delusional thinking the pure maths is not the way to go?
e.g 4/1defeats 9/1=39/1
whilst 9/1 defeats 4/1 = 44/1
seems the difference in 'real' terms is not great enough.
Does anyone have a table that skews the weight more in the favour of the more popular result?
or am i delusional thinking the pure maths is not the way to go?
Show More
Z - don't you mean SFCs and TRICASTS????????????
If you can't get terminology "right" then you have no idea what you are doing!
If you can't get terminology "right" then you have no idea what you are doing!
Great answer DFC but I think ziggy has found what he's looking for on the Aussie forum.
ty for your help those who chose to help...and the derision is unnecessary gentlemen.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539