General Betting
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
17 Apr 12
01:56
Joined:
Date Joined:
23 Jul 04
I am aware of Harville's work in this area,but find I am uncomfortable with the figures.
e.g 4/1defeats 9/1=39/1
whilst 9/1 defeats 4/1 = 44/1
seems the difference in 'real' terms is not great enough.
Does anyone have a table that skews the weight more in the favour of the more popular result?
or am i delusional thinking the pure maths is not the way to go?
e.g 4/1defeats 9/1=39/1
whilst 9/1 defeats 4/1 = 44/1
seems the difference in 'real' terms is not great enough.
Does anyone have a table that skews the weight more in the favour of the more popular result?
or am i delusional thinking the pure maths is not the way to go?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 4
|
By:
delusional
|
|
By:
Z - don't you mean SFCs and TRICASTS????????????
If you can't get terminology "right" then you have no idea what you are doing! |
|
By:
Great answer DFC but I think ziggy has found what he's looking for on the Aussie forum.
|
|
By:
ty for your help those who chose to help...and the derision is unnecessary gentlemen.
|