The 21 was matched well after the 29.00 went up. There is no doubt about that. The times can be cross referenced against several sources, the declared fact that the 29.00 went up about a minute into the race, and the fact the times given by Betfair for the matches at 29.00 are after the Youtube video (which starts at about 14:04:18) shows the 29.00 was up there.
The VisThe 21 was matched well after the 29.00 went up. There is no doubt about that. The times can be cross referenced against several sources, the declared fact that the 29.00 went up about a minute into the race, and the fact the times given by
Always thought it was 1.01 the OP worked for Betfair. However, if the cross matching bot really is jumping down to below the highest available price, skimming off more money for Betfair, that would be a major scandal.
Always thought it was 1.01 the OP worked for Betfair. However, if the cross matching bot really is jumping down to below the highest available price, skimming off more money for Betfair, that would be a major scandal.
It's hard to think of an explanation - other than the cross matcher is not providing best execution.
You're right ballabriggs - failing any other explanation this is a real scandal in the making.
It's hard to think of an explanation - other than the cross matcher is not providing best execution.You're right ballabriggs - failing any other explanation this is a real scandal in the making.
in e-mails betfair have sent to customers who had bets voided in the race it says bets were matched at 21 but when I checked my account today it says bet matched at 29.I dont know if the e-mail is incorrect or if they have changed these bets at a later date.
I have received an e-mail at 3-03 from betfair saying customers will be informed shortly regarding this matter......
in e-mails betfair have sent to customers who had bets voided in the race it says bets were matched at 21 but when I checked my account today it says bet matched at 29.I dont know if the e-mail is incorrect or if they have changed these bets at a lat
but suspect that the voiding email is displaying the price they asked for on thier bet not the matched price...
probably just as simple as that....
Other explinations for this are very complex - so until it is show that these where MATCHED prices and not REQUESTED prices...
I would not run away with ideas....
if these bets are MATCHED PRICES and not fabricated then, there is a issue to look at
I DONT KNOW FOR SURE....but suspect that the voiding email is displaying the price they asked for on thier bet not the matched price...probably just as simple as that.... Other explinations for this are very complex - so until it is show that these w
OK in that case if 21 was genuinely being matched with 29 showing then BF and their in-running matcher have got some serious questions to answer as an aside to the main case.
OK in that case if 21 was genuinely being matched with 29 showing then BF and their in-running matcher have got some serious questions to answer as an aside to the main case.
Someone posted this on hrse racing forum shortly after the race , so I guess those prices showing must have been the asking price while the matched price was 29 :
Someone posted this on hrse racing forum shortly after the race , so I guess those prices showing must have been the asking price while the matched price was 29 : Below was the in-running market on Voler le Vedette 2.38 €2,569 2.40 €5 €4,485 2.