|
By:
Despite all that he says, which undoubtedly is likely to be a fairly accurate reflection of the inside of BF, it still remains a wonderful alternative betting option for so, so many people, to being royally screwed by the major bookies.
Personally I couldn't imagine my " betting " life without it. Long may it survive and prosper. I hope good competition from other sites evolves in due course ( though I doubt it from the sound of Ferguson's comments), if only to ensure that monopoly fever/abuse does not destroy the whole edifice. |
|
By:
Excellent interview. Thanks for posting.
|
|
By:
ditto
|
|
By:
Probably the most accurate and perceptive account ever posted on here.
I don't suppose it will ever happen - but they really ought to hire him back as a consultant. |
|
By:
Just don't put him in the same room as the vaporiser eh MM ?.
Somehow I don't think they would get on too well. The new MD could do a lot worse than sitting down and absorbing many of the points made in that interview. And you know it doesn't at all come over as nose out of joint barbs of a bitter ex-employee. Quite the opposite in fact. Critical but constructively so. |
|
By:
I wouldn't take 1000 on him gong back. Scotty is happy elsewhere.
|
|
By:
Good interview. Confirmed what has been posted by many on the General Forum over the years. Would have liked some views on the growth of the trader/trading and its effects on other players and on the business.
|
|
By:
http://twitter.com/#!/borisranting
|
|
By:
Good read - Betfair is still the best option for many punters but it's sad to see how things have changed for the worse from the early days.
'All that glitters is not gold' comes to mind. |
|
By:
excellent interview.
Scott's description of the evolution of Betfair mirrors most of the big betting companies; bean counters and people who don't understand the basis of the game taking over, ceases to be fun, customers inundated with mug games, "good guys" leave, "greed and desperation to increase revenues, service levels sink etc. |
|
By:
Finest gold in town, transformed into r4tners
|
|
By:
And odds on this thread being mysteriously vaporised sometime soon ?
|
|
By:
Why chould it be? Scotty didn't leave under a cloud...and what he says is common knowledge to all intelligent punters on here.
|
|
By:
I agree, but from MM's posts on another thread, some do seem to be a mite sensitive to criticism at BF towers.
|
|
By:
If they got ride of everybody that had a negative view of how they have developed (since about 2004) - they wouldn't have any customers left FAFH. It would turn into the king of company that banned the press from their Results Announcement.
|
|
By:
the kind of company that banned the press from their Results Announcement.
|
|
By:
A prime example of exactly how rancid this company is,the last race yesterday in Ireland. Betfair make a mistake by not turning the race in play. So anyone who wins on the race in running is told the bets are void. So Betfair make a mistake and the punters have to pay for it.
|
|
By:
That seems fair to void bets.
|
|
By:
Btw why did the founders of BF become so marginalised and eventually irrelevant in their own company ?
After all it doesn't have to be that way ( Google being a current classic example of that ). Did they lose motivation? Did they lose vision/run out of ideas ? Did it all become too techie for them to fully understand and control? Or were they only ever in it for a quick buck ? What is the real story there ? Why were the bean counters allowed to take over ? |
|
By:
Bert took the money and ran.
|
|
By:
And odds on this thread being mysteriously vaporised sometime soon ?
well it's on the golf forum, and I posted it on the football forum, if all 3 disappeared that would say alot. |
|
By:
also kinda reminds me of when steve jobs had to leave apple then they realised they needed him back.
|
|
By:
I dont understand why the founders let outsiders takeover the company and tear it appart. Surely they are still the biggest individual shareholders and have the most to lose.
|
|
By:
They have too much money to worry about that.
|
|
By:
THANKS FOR POSTING IT ,
|
|
By:
THE SHAREHOLDERS PROFIT WILL ALLWAYS COME FIRST FROM NOW ON
|
|
By:
Good post thanks.
Looks like we can expect PC4 in the very near future. ![]() |
|
By:
Often the founders get pressured out. Not saying that is the case with Andrew Black but it could be. From reading the odd article about him he didn't seem to be a highly driven individual, just a normal bloke with a good idea, who dare I say got a bit lucky. A normal bloke would take the money and enjoy life.
The interview is a really good read, insofar as a partial outsider, it says it exactly how I feel it is. Very rare for me to be in total agreement with everything said. |
|
By:
Thanks for the post.
I met Scott once, seemed like a decent chap. And I agree with 100% of what he says in this interview. |
|
By:
I think a lot of people are romanticising by concluding the pc would never have happened if Bert & Co were still in charge. 1.01 they were in agreement with it.
|
|
By:
^^ why do you say that ?
|
|
By:
Educated guess SF. They were city boys just like the PC's creator.
|
|
By:
The pc perhaps, but PC2 ?
|
|
By:
betfair has treat its core customers with contempt....name me one other organisation that would charge some of its better customers with obscene charges!!!
|
|
By:
it's better customers take alot of money out of the system, that was the problem.
|
|
By:
the police
|
|
By:
but also put alot of money into the system in the first place streetfutsal..it's called liquidity....i've paid over 200k in commission....thats about 30k a year for every year i've been on betfair....how much liquidity does betfair provide???? absolutely sweet fa
|
|
By:
But you made profit from using the service. Why shouldnt you pay for for is effectively stock for your shop
|
|
By:
all betfair is ....is a concept (an exchange)...and betfair provide the it infrastructure to facilitate peoples bets and settle them ....nothing more or less....should i pay more in a week in commission and premium charge than the average monthly mortgage payment ffs....NO
|